IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ris/eaerev/0043.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

TPP versus RCEP: Control of Membership and Agenda Setting

Author

Listed:
  • Hamanaka, Shintaro

    (Asian Development Bank)

Abstract

This paper argues that the formation of regional integration frameworks can be best understood as a dominant state's attempt to create a preferred regional framework in which it can exercise exclusive influence. In this context, it is important to observe not only which countries are included in a regional framework, but also which countries are excluded from it. For example, the distinct feature of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) is its exclusion of China, and that of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) is its exclusion of the United States (US). An exclusion of a particular country does not mean that the excluded country will perpetually remain outside the framework. In fact, TPP may someday include China, resulting from a policy of the US "engaging" or "socializing" China rather than "balancing" against it. However, the first step of such a policy is to establish a regional framework from which the target country of engagement is excluded.

Suggested Citation

  • Hamanaka, Shintaro, 2014. "TPP versus RCEP: Control of Membership and Agenda Setting," East Asian Economic Review, Korea Institute for International Economic Policy, vol. 18(2), pages 163-186, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:ris:eaerev:0043
    DOI: 10.11644/KIEP.JEAI.2014.18.2.279
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11644/KIEP.JEAI.2014.18.2.279
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.11644/KIEP.JEAI.2014.18.2.279?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Qingtun Kong & Masaaki Yamada & Chengcheng Yang & Haisong Nie, 2025. "Competition or complementarity? Assessing the interaction effects of RCEP and CPTPP on agricultural and non-agricultural trade flows," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 1-31, February.
    2. Hamanaka, Shintaro, 2016. "Dynamics of investment negotiations between China and Japan : the China-Japan-Korea trilateral investment treaty and beyond," IDE Discussion Papers 613, Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization(JETRO).
    3. Hamanaka, Shintaro, 2018. "Theorizing regional group formation : anatomy of regional institutions from a membership perspective," IDE Discussion Papers 683, Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization(JETRO).
    4. Jeffrey J. Schott & Cathleen Cimino, 2014. "Should Korea Join the Trans-Pacific Partnership?," Policy Briefs PB14-22, Peterson Institute for International Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Free Trade Agreements (FTAs); Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP); Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP); Membership; Exclusion; Agenda Setting;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F13 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations
    • F15 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Economic Integration
    • F53 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - International Agreements and Observance; International Organizations

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:eaerev:0043. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: JE Lee (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/kieppkr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.