IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rfh/jprjor/v9y2023i2p490-494.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of Organizational Justice on Teachers’ Job Effectiveness

Author

Listed:
  • Mubbshir Ali

    (PhD (Education) Scholar, Department of Educational Research and Assessment, University of Okara, Pakistan)

  • Dr. Muhammad Tahir khan Farooqi

    (Associate Professor of Education, Department of Educational Research and Assessment, University of Okara, Pakistan)

  • Dr. Syed Abdul Waheed

    (Assistant Professor of Education, Department of Educational Studies, University of Okara, Pakistan)

Abstract

The study in hand aimed to explore the effect of organizational justice on teachers’ job effectiveness. The population of the study was comprised of all (7576) secondary school teachers of Rawalpindi district. It was not feasible for the researcher to approach the whole population. Thus, researcher used convenient random sampling technique and collected the data from 350 secondary school teachers. As the research was descriptive and quantitative, so the researcher was used organizational justice questionnaire (OJQ) to measure the organizational justice and job effectiveness questionnaire (JEQ) to determine teachers job effectiveness. The collected data was analyzed by using SPSS version (26). The Statical tests t-test and Pearson-r for used data analysis. The results of this study indicated an optimistic and significant effect of organizational justice on job effectiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Mubbshir Ali & Dr. Muhammad Tahir khan Farooqi & Dr. Syed Abdul Waheed, 2023. "Effect of Organizational Justice on Teachers’ Job Effectiveness," Journal of Policy Research (JPR), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 9(2), pages 490-494.
    • Handle: RePEc:rfh:jprjor:v:9:y:2023:i:2:p:490-494
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://jprpk.com/index.php/jpr/article/view/335/526
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://jprpk.com/index.php/jpr/article/view/335
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Greenberg, Jerald, 2002. "Who stole the money, and when? Individual and situational determinants of employee theft," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 89(1), pages 985-1003, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Douhou, Salima & Magnus, Jan R. & van Soest, Arthur, 2011. "The perception of small crime," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 749-763.
    2. Brian Whitaker & Lindsey Godwin, 2013. "The Antecedents of Moral Imagination in the Workplace: A Social Cognitive Theory Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 114(1), pages 61-73, April.
    3. David Jones, 2009. "A Novel Approach to Business Ethics Training: Improving Moral Reasoning in Just a Few Weeks," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 88(2), pages 367-379, August.
    4. Elizabeth Umphress & Lily Ren & John Bingham & Celile Gogus, 2009. "The Influence of Distributive Justice on Lying for and Stealing from a Supervisor," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 86(4), pages 507-518, June.
    5. Robert Giacalone & Mark Promislo, 2010. "Unethical and Unwell: Decrements in Well-Being and Unethical Activity at Work," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 91(2), pages 275-297, January.
    6. Emmanuel Osafo & Amy Paros & Robert M. Yawson, 2021. "Valence–Instrumentality–Expectancy Model of Motivation as an Alternative Model for Examining Ethical Leadership Behaviors," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(2), pages 21582440211, June.
    7. Joaquín Camps & Antonio Majocchi, 2010. "Learning Atmosphere and Ethical Behavior, Does It Make Sense?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 94(1), pages 129-147, June.
    8. Brenda Nguyen & Mary Crossan, 2022. "Character-Infused Ethical Decision Making," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 178(1), pages 171-191, June.
    9. Colquitt, Jason A. & Scott, Brent A. & Judge, Timothy A. & Shaw, John C., 2006. "Justice and personality: Using integrative theories to derive moderators of justice effects," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 100(1), pages 110-127, May.
    10. Michael Housman & Dylan Minor, 2015. "Toxic Workers," Harvard Business School Working Papers 16-057, Harvard Business School, revised Nov 2015.
    11. Muel Kaptein, 2009. "Ethics Programs and Ethical Culture: A Next Step in Unraveling Their Multi-Faceted Relationship," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 89(2), pages 261-281, October.
    12. Muel Kaptein, 2010. "The Ethics of Organizations: A Longitudinal Study of the U.S. Working Population," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 92(4), pages 601-618, April.
    13. Pablo Zoghbi-Manrique-de-Lara & Mercedes Viera-Armas, 2019. "Does Ethical Leadership Motivate Followers to Participate in Delivering Compassion?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 154(1), pages 195-210, January.
    14. Thomas Tang & Yuh-Jia Chen, 2008. "Intelligence Vs. Wisdom: The Love of Money, Machiavellianism, and Unethical Behavior across College Major and Gender," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 82(1), pages 1-26, September.
    15. Jiatao Li & Carmen Ng, 2013. "The Normalization of Deviant Organizational Practices: The Non-performing Loans Problem in China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 114(4), pages 643-653, June.
    16. Lin, Chieh-Peng & Tsai, Yuan-Hui & Liu, Min-Ling, 2016. "Something good and something bad in R&D teams: Effects of social identification and dysfunctional behavior," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 191-199.
    17. Mac Clouse & Robert A. Giacalone & Tricia D. Olsen & Lorenzo Patelli, 2017. "Individual Ethical Orientations and the Perceived Acceptability of Questionable Finance Ethics Decisions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 144(3), pages 549-558, September.
    18. Paul Harvey & Mark J. Martinko & Nancy Borkowski, 2017. "Justifying Deviant Behavior: The Role of Attributions and Moral Emotions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 141(4), pages 779-795, April.
    19. Greg Loviscky & Linda Treviño & Rick Jacobs, 2007. "Assessing Managers’ Ethical Decision-making: An Objective Measure of Managerial Moral Judgment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 73(3), pages 263-285, July.
    20. Ofer, Ephrat & Coyle-Shapiro, Jackie & Pearce, Jone L., 2019. "Eyes wide open: perceived exploitation and its consequences," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 90823, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfh:jprjor:v:9:y:2023:i:2:p:490-494. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Muhammad Irfan Chani (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rffhlpk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.