IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rfa/bmsjnl/v9y2023i1p1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of the Furniture Industrial Panorama, in Brazil, in Relation to the Adoption of Industry 4.0 Technologies

Author

Listed:
  • Dusan Schreiber
  • Alexandre André Feil
  • Cristiane Froehlich
  • Vilson José Becker

Abstract

The furniture industry is a traditional segment, with a global presence, and as in other markets and segments, globalization has contributed to creating an environment of fierce competition between small, medium and large companies. China, the European Union and the United States are the biggest producers and also the biggest consumers of furniture products. Brazil is also included in this market, but with lower production and consumption volumes. The objective of this study is to analyze panorama of the furniture industry in Brazil and abroad, in relation to the adoption of industry 4.0 technologies to foster new working conditions and productivity. In this work, authors opted for the format of reflective theoretical essay, based on the result of systematic review of literature, performed in Scopus, in February, 2023, employing keywords “Furniture manufacturing†and “Industry 4.0†, with any other restrictions. Only 47 articles were published in this timeline. Analyzing these articles was evidenced that main obstacles to the adoption of technologies I4.0 is related to the insufficient proofs of the advantages and benefits that these technologies may provide for furniture manufacturing process, lack of the awareness of the employees to enable internalization of knowledge about technologies of 4.0 industry. To accomplish this will be necessary to perform actions to establish collaborative networks, both internal and external, to validate the new organizational practices/ routines, and consolidate its adoption in the manufacturing environment. As conclusion of the study is possible to state that the lack of knowledge of I4.0 technologies and their benefits, by workforce and organizational managers also, lack of financing sources and of government policies to foster adoption of technologies I4.0 are among main obstacles to the adoption of the technologies of industry 4.0. Reducing the distance between universities and industries, investing in R&D, using already available and low-cost technologies and adopting proven and established production methods were also highlighted as premises for I4's technologies and that may to succeed in the furniture segment. I4.0 technologies show the potential to maximize productivity and profitability by reducing lead time, operating costs, increasing quality, flexibility of the operational process, in addition to differentiated design.Â

Suggested Citation

  • Dusan Schreiber & Alexandre André Feil & Cristiane Froehlich & Vilson José Becker, 2023. "Analysis of the Furniture Industrial Panorama, in Brazil, in Relation to the Adoption of Industry 4.0 Technologies," Business and Management Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 9(1), pages 1-1, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:rfa:bmsjnl:v:9:y:2023:i:1:p:1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://redfame.com/journal/index.php/bms/article/download/5892/6103
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://redfame.com/journal/index.php/bms/article/view/5892
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ercan Oztemel & Samet Gursev, 2020. "Literature review of Industry 4.0 and related technologies," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 127-182, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Govindan, Kannan & Kannan, Devika & Jørgensen, Thomas Ballegård & Nielsen, Tim Straarup, 2022. "Supply Chain 4.0 performance measurement: A systematic literature review, framework development, and empirical evidence," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    2. Tiago Afonso & Anabela C. Alves & Paula Carneiro, 2021. "Lean Thinking, Logistic and Ergonomics: Synergetic Triad to Prepare Shop Floor Work Systems to Face Pandemic Situations," International Journal of Global Business and Competitiveness, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 62-76, December.
    3. Shuting Wang & Jie Meng & Yuanlong Xie & Liquan Jiang & Han Ding & Xinyu Shao, 2023. "Reference training system for intelligent manufacturing talent education: platform construction and curriculum development," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 1125-1164, March.
    4. Xiaoyu Zhan & Delia Mioara Popescu & Valentin Radu, 2020. "Challenges for Romanian Entrepreneurs in Managing Remote Workers," Book chapters-LUMEN Proceedings, in: Marcin Waldemar STANIEWSKI & Valentina VASILE & Adriana Grigorescu (ed.), International Conference Innovative Business Management & Global Entrepreneurship (IBMAGE 2020), edition 1, volume 14, chapter 49, pages 670-687, Editura Lumen.
    5. Christoph March & Ina Schieferdecker, 2021. "Technological Sovereignty as Ability, Not Autarky," CESifo Working Paper Series 9139, CESifo.
    6. Rui Wang & Xiangyu Guo & Shisheng Zhong & Gaolei Peng & Lin Wang, 2022. "Decision rule mining for machining method chains based on rough set theory," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 799-807, March.
    7. Pompeu Casanovas & Louis de Koker & Mustafa Hashmi, 2022. "Law, Socio-Legal Governance, the Internet of Things, and Industry 4.0: A Middle-Out/Inside-Out Approach," J, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-28, January.
    8. Anna Kwiotkowska & Radosław Wolniak & Bożena Gajdzik & Magdalena Gębczyńska, 2022. "Configurational Paths of Leadership Competency Shortages and 4.0 Leadership Effectiveness: An fs/QCA Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-21, February.
    9. Masoud Zafarzadeh & Magnus Wiktorsson & Jannicke Baalsrud Hauge, 2021. "A Systematic Review on Technologies for Data-Driven Production Logistics: Their Role from a Holistic and Value Creation Perspective," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-32, April.
    10. Özköse, Hakan & Güney, Gül, 2023. "The effects of industry 4.0 on productivity: A scientific mapping study," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    11. Peerally, Jahan Ara & Santiago, Fernando & De Fuentes, Claudia & Moghavvemi, Sedigheh, 2022. "Towards a firm-level technological capability framework to endorse and actualize the Fourth Industrial Revolution in developing countries," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(10).
    12. Iñigo Flores Ituarte & Suraj Panicker & Hari P. N. Nagarajan & Eric Coatanea & David W. Rosen, 2023. "Optimisation-driven design to explore and exploit the process–structure–property–performance linkages in digital manufacturing," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 219-241, January.
    13. Qinglan Liu & Adriana Hofmann Trevisan & Miying Yang & Janaina Mascarenhas, 2022. "A framework of digital technologies for the circular economy: Digital functions and mechanisms," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 2171-2192, July.
    14. Liangjie Xia & Yongwan Bai & Sanjoy Ghose & Juanjuan Qin, 2022. "Differential game analysis of carbon emissions reduction and promotion in a sustainable supply chain considering social preferences," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 310(1), pages 257-292, March.
    15. Szymon Cyfert & Waldemar Glabiszewski & Maciej Zastempowski, 2021. "Impact of Management Tools Supporting Industry 4.0 on the Importance of CSR during COVID-19. Generation Z," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-13, March.
    16. John Mugambwa Serumaga-Zake & John Andrew van der Poll, 2021. "Addressing the Impact of Fourth Industrial Revolution on South African Manufacturing Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-31, October.
    17. Kyu Tae Park & Jinho Yang & Sang Do Noh, 2021. "VREDI: virtual representation for a digital twin application in a work-center-level asset administration shell," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 501-544, February.
    18. Damian Grzechca & Paweł Rybka & Roman Pawełczyk, 2021. "Level Crossing Barrier Machine Faults and Anomaly Detection with the Use of Motor Current Waveform Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-14, May.
    19. Andrei, Mariana & Thollander, Patrik & Sannö, Anna, 2022. "Knowledge demands for energy management in manufacturing industry - A systematic literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    20. Federica Costa & Alberto Portioli-Staudacher, 2021. "Labor flexibility integration in workload control in Industry 4.0 era," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 420-433, December.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rfa:bmsjnl:v:9:y:2023:i:1:p:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Redfame publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.