IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rev/reveca/v18y2010i2p131-162.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Discriminación En Consejos De Administración: Análisis E Implicaciones Económicas

Author

Listed:
  • RUTH MATEOS DE CABO

    (Universidad CEU San Pablo)

  • RICARDO GIMENO

    (Banco de España)

  • LORENZO ESCOT

    (Universidad Complutense de Madrid)

Abstract

La diversidad de género en los consejos de administración se ha convertido en un tema relevante en el ámbito del gobierno corporativo. Según este estudio, sólo el 6,61% de los consejeros de las 1.085 empresas españolas más grandes son mujeres. Resulta crucial identificar las causas y posibles tipos de discriminación detrás de esta baja representación, ya que tendrán diferentes implicaciones económicas. Los resultados de los modelos estimados apuntan algunos indicios de discriminación. La proporción de mujeres es mayor cuando hay más asientos dominicales disponibles. Existen empresas exclusivistas en las que prevalece la homogeneidad dentro del consejo. Finalmente, habría sociedades que estarían infravalorando sistemáticamente las capacidades de las mujeres, situación que tiende a desaparecer si las empresas ya cuentan con consejeras.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruth Mateos De Cabo & Ricardo Gimeno & Lorenzo Escot, 2010. "Discriminación En Consejos De Administración: Análisis E Implicaciones Económicas," Revista de Economia Aplicada, Universidad de Zaragoza, Departamento de Estructura Economica y Economia Publica, vol. 18(2), pages 131-162, Autumn.
    • Handle: RePEc:rev:reveca:v:18:y:2010:i:2:p:131-162
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.revecap.com/revista/numeros/53/pdf/mateos_gimeno_escot.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. C. José García Martín & Begoña Herrero, 2018. "Boards of directors: composition and effects on the performance of the firm," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(1), pages 1015-1041, January.
    2. María Jesús Carrasco-Santos & Carmen Cristófol Rodríguez & Eva Royo Rodríguez, 2020. "Why Is the Spanish Hotel Trade Lagging So Far Behind in Gender Equality? A Sustainability Question," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-20, May.
    3. Rosa M. Yagüe-Perales & Pau Pérez-Ledo & Isidre March-Chordà, 2021. "Analysing the Impact of the Glass Ceiling in a Managerial Career: The Case of Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-18, June.
    4. Diana Denisse Mendoza Quintero & Guadalupe del Carmen Briano Turrent & María Luisa Saavedra García, 2018. "Diversidad de género en posiciones estratégicas y el nivel de endeudamiento: evidencia en empresas cotizadas mexicanas," Remef - Revista Mexicana de Economía y Finanzas Nueva Época REMEF (The Mexican Journal of Economics and Finance), Instituto Mexicano de Ejecutivos de Finanzas, IMEF, vol. 13(4), pages 631-654, Octubre-D.
    5. María Consuelo Pucheta-Martínez & Inmaculada Bel-Oms & Gustau Olcina-Sempere, 2018. "Female Institutional Directors on Boards and Firm Value," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 152(2), pages 343-363, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    discriminación de género; gobierno corporativo; consejos de administración; techo de cristal;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G34 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Mergers; Acquisitions; Restructuring; Corporate Governance
    • J16 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Economics of Gender; Non-labor Discrimination
    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility
    • C35 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Discrete Regression and Qualitative Choice Models; Discrete Regressors; Proportions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rev:reveca:v:18:y:2010:i:2:p:131-162. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ana Belén Gracia (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dhzares.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.