IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rbs/ijbrss/v9y2020i4p169-174.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Building empowerment model of cocoa oil small-sized industries to increase value added

Author

Listed:
  • Sudirman Zaid

    (Faculty of Economics and Business, Halu Oleo University, Indonesia)

  • La Hatani

    (Faculty of Economics and Business, Halu Oleo University, Indonesia)

  • Hayat Yusuf

    (Faculty of Economics and Business, Halu Oleo University, Indonesia)

Abstract

This study aims to explore the problems faced by cocoa oil small-sized industries and develop an empowerment model design from the perspective of business management to increase added value implemented in the Agropolitan Region in the Province of Southeast Sulawesi, Indonesia. This study uses a qualitative approach, where data analysis is performed using the Nvivo 12 Plus software. Exploration results show that the perspective of business management which is a problem in the development of cocoa oil small-sized industries is the supply of raw materials; price of raw materials; variable cost; machine capacity; human resources; capital; institutional; product price; market access; assets legality; and partnership. The results of the design of the empowerment model explained that there was a need for a partnership between cocoa oil small-sized industries and other related parties such as; supplier of raw materials and target markets so that this empowerment effort can go well; and it is hoped that there will be government support in managerial aspects, both physical and non-physical so that cocoa oil small-sized industries can increase the added value Key Words: Empowerment; Model Design, Cocoa Oil Small-sized Industries, Problems and Solution, Business Perspective

Suggested Citation

  • Sudirman Zaid & La Hatani & Hayat Yusuf, 2020. "Building empowerment model of cocoa oil small-sized industries to increase value added," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 9(4), pages 169-174, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:9:y:2020:i:4:p:169-174
    DOI: 10.20525/ijrbs.v9i4.727
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijrbs/article/view/727/590
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v9i4.727
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.20525/ijrbs.v9i4.727?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fetterman, David M., 1994. "Steps of empowerment evaluation: From California to Cape Town," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 305-313.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lisa M. Vaughn & MaryAnn Lohmueller, 2014. "Calling All Stakeholders," Evaluation Review, , vol. 38(4), pages 336-355, August.
    2. Weber, Olaf & Ahmad, Adnan, 2014. "Empowerment Through Microfinance: The Relation Between Loan Cycle and Level of Empowerment," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 75-87.
    3. José M. Díaz-Puente & José L. Yagüe & Ana Afonso, 2008. "Building Evaluation Capacity in Spain," Evaluation Review, , vol. 32(5), pages 478-506, October.
    4. Magro, Edurne & Wilson, James R., 2019. "Policy-mix evaluation: Governance challenges from new place-based innovation policies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(10).
    5. Schalock, Robert L. & Bonham, Gordon S. & Marchand, Cristine B., 2000. "Consumer based quality of life assessment: a path model of perceived satisfaction," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 77-87, February.
    6. Luis Arturo Pinzon‐Salcedo & María Alejandra Torres‐Cuello, 2022. "Systems thinking concepts within a collaborative programme evaluation methodology: The Hermes Programme evaluation," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(4), pages 708-722, July.
    7. Ramanath, Ramya, 2014. "Ethical implications of resource-limited evaluations: Lessons from an INGO in the eastern Democratic Republic of Congo," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 25-37.
    8. Green, Rex S. & Ellis, Peter T., 2008. "Foster youth evaluate the performance of group home services in California," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 174-180, May.
    9. Wolff, Lisa S. & Errichetti, Karen Sautter & Tapia Walker, Stephanie & Davis, Mary V. & Brodesky, Michelle Kuhns, 2020. "Striking a Balance between Program-Specific and Portfolio-Level Evaluation: Lessons Learned from a Multi-Site Evaluation on the Texas-Mexico Border," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    10. Bob Townley & Stuart Wilks-Heeg, 1999. "Democratic evaluation: Putting principles into practice," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 14(1), pages 27-42, May.
    11. Beardmore, Amy & Jones, Matthew & Seal, Joanne, 2023. "Outcome harvesting as a methodology for the retrospective evaluation of small-scale community development interventions," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    12. Nanny Bressers & Lasse Gerrits, 2015. "A Complexity-Informed Approach to Evaluating National Knowledge and Innovation Programmes," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 50-63, January.
    13. O’Leary, Susan, 2017. "Grassroots accountability promises in rights-based approaches to development: The role of transformative monitoring and evaluation in NGOs," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 21-41.
    14. Ryan, Katherine E. & Geissler, Barbara & Knell, Suzanne, 1996. "Progress and accountability in family literacy: Lessons from a collaborative approach," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 263-272, August.
    15. Anzoise, Valentina & Sardo, Stefania, 2016. "Dynamic systems and the role of evaluation: The case of the Green Communities project," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 162-172.
    16. van den Eynde, Julie & Veno, Arthur & Hart, Alison, 2003. "They look good but don't work: a case study of global performance indicators in crime prevention," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 237-248, August.
    17. Graeme Auld & Stefan Renckens & Benjamin Cashore, 2015. "Transnational private governance between the logics of empowerment and control," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(2), pages 108-124, June.
    18. McDonald, Diane, 1999. "Developing guidelines to enhance the evaluation of overseas development projects," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 163-174, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:9:y:2020:i:4:p:169-174. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Umit Hacioglu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ssbffea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.