IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rbs/ijbrss/v11y2022i7p322-330.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing results-based personnel performance system in the Ministry of Home and Child Care, Zimbabwe

Author

Listed:
  • Mervis Chiware

    (Postgraduate Student, School of Public Management, Governance and Public Policy, College of Business and Economics, University of Johannesburg, South Africa)

  • Shikha Vyas-Doorgapersad

    (Professor, School of Public Management, Governance and Public Policy, College of Business and Economics, University of Johannesburg, South Africa)

Abstract

A formal performance management (PM) system was adopted and put into place in Zimbabwe in 1995 because of many suggestions made by the Public Service Review Commission (PSRC). However, the human resource management (HRM) period since the 1980s has had flaws that led to the implementation of the Results-Based Personnel Performance System (RBPPS) in 2005, particularly in terms of the Africanisation drive following Zimbabwe's independence and the PM system that followed in 1995. The study's objective is to examine the effectiveness of RBPPS in improving the Ministry of Health and Child Care (MOHCC) performance in Zimbabwe. Information was gathered and compiled using a qualitative research methodology. The research identified elements that contributed to PM's failure in the MOHCC, including management's lack of commitment, a lack of ongoing training, and flaws in the planning and execution of PM. As a result, the government eventually implemented the RBPPS to improve the PM process. The study considers empirical and scholarly findings that may lead to more significant outcomes for Zimbabwe's public sector. Key Words:Human resource management, performance management, Results-Based Personnel Performance System, Ministry of Home and Child Care, Zimbabwe

Suggested Citation

  • Mervis Chiware & Shikha Vyas-Doorgapersad, 2022. "Assessing results-based personnel performance system in the Ministry of Home and Child Care, Zimbabwe," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 11(7), pages 322-330, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:11:y:2022:i:7:p:322-330
    DOI: 10.20525/ijrbs.v11i7.1999
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijrbs/article/view/1999/1497
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v11i7.1999
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.20525/ijrbs.v11i7.1999?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jody Zall Kusek & Ray C. Rist, 2004. "Ten Steps to a Results-Based Monitoring and Evaluation System : A Handbook for Development Practitioners," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 14926.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chumasande Lalendle & Leila Goedhals-Gerber & Joubert van Eeden, 2021. "A Monitoring and Evaluation Sustainability Framework for Road Freight Transporters in South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-22, July.
    2. Richard Douglas Kamara, 2020. "Outcomes-based performance management through measuring indicators: Collaborative governance for local economic development (LED) in South African municipalities," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 9(1), pages 1-19, July.
    3. Edwin Omondi Arwa & Prof. Charles M. Rambo, PhD & Dr. Isaac Abuya, PhD, 2021. "Participative stakeholder involvement approach and implementation of water projects in Kisumu East sub-county, Kenya," International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 8(12), pages 66-72, December.
    4. Shyam Singh & Nathalie Holvoet & Vivek Pandey, 2018. "Bridging Sustainability and Corporate Social Responsibility: Culture of Monitoring and Evaluation of CSR Initiatives in India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-19, July.
    5. Fabricio Esteban Espinoza Molina & Blanca del Valle Arenas Ramirez & Francisco Aparicio Izquierdo & Diana Carolina Zúñiga Ortega, 2021. "Road Safety Perception Questionnaire (RSPQ) in Latin America: A Development and Validation Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-21, March.
    6. Rosalía Rodriguez-García & Elizabeth M. White, 2005. "Self-Assessment in Managing for Results: Conducting Self-Assessment for Development Practitioners," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 7292.
    7. Independent Evaluation Group, 2006. "From Schooling Access to Learning Outcomes, An Unfinished Agenda : An Evaluation of World Bank Support to Primary Education," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 7083.
    8. World Bank, 2013. "Dealing with GAC Issues in Project Lending : The Special Case of Fragile and Conflict-Affected States," World Bank Publications - Reports 16725, The World Bank Group.
    9. Lydia Nyambura & James Mutuiri & David Mutwiri & Jeffrey Maina & Dennis Njiru & Peterson Obara Magutu, 2018. "Lean Supply Chain Management Practices and Procurement Performance of Leading Supermarkets in Nairobi, Kenya," Noble International Journal of Business and Management Research, Noble Academic Publsiher, vol. 2(12), pages 101-112, December.
    10. Peter J. Baldacchino & Chantelle Camilleri & Simon Grima & Frank H. Bezzina, 2017. "Assessing Incentive and Monitoring Schemes in the Corporate Governance of Maltese Co-operatives," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3A), pages 177-195.
    11. Oana Luca & Florian Gaman & Emanuel Răuță, 2021. "Towards a National Harmonized Framework for Urban Plans and Strategies in Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-16, February.
    12. Holvoet, N. & Renard, Robrecht, 2007. "Monitoring and evaluation under the PRSP: Solid rock or quicksand?," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 66-81, February.
    13. Noel Hepworth, 2017. "Is implementing the IPSASs an appropriate reform?," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(2), pages 141-148, February.
    14. Roula Khadra & Juan Antonio Sagardoy & Suzan Taha & Nicola Lamaddalena, 2017. "Participatory Irrigation Management and Transfer: Setting the Guiding Principles for a Sustaining Monitoring & Evaluation System – a Focus on the Mediterranean," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 31(13), pages 4227-4238, October.
    15. Roula Khadra & Juan Antonio Sagardoy & Suzan Taha & Nicola Lamaddalena, 2018. "MONEVA - a Monitoring & Evaluation System to Assess the Performance of Participatory Irrigation Management/Irrigation Management Transfer Programs in the Mediterranean Region," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 32(1), pages 123-140, January.
    16. Heinemann, E. & Van Hemelrijck, A. & Guijt, I., 2017. "IFAD RESEARCH SERIES 16 - Getting the most out of impact evaluation for learning, reporting and influence," IFAD Research Series 280054, International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD).
    17. Independent Evaluation Group, 2007. "Sourcebook for Evaluating Global and Regional Partnership Programs : Indicative Principles and Standards," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 6601.
    18. Landiyanto, Erlangga Agustino, 2015. "Transformation of the national monitoring and evaluation arrangement in decentralized Indonesia," MPRA Paper 69073, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Santiago, Jose L. & Ballesteros, Marta A. & Chapela, Rosa & Silva, Cristina & Nielsen, Kåre N. & Rangel, Mafalda & Erzini, Karim & Wise, Laura & Campos, Aida & Borges, Maria F. & Sala, Antonello & Vir, 2015. "Is Europe ready for a results-based approach to fisheries management? The voice of stakeholders," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 86-97.
    20. Viajar, Rowena V. & Dorado, Julieta B. & Rongavilla, Emily O. & Caraig, Georgina S. & Gulay, Joanne Jette S., 2022. "Monitoring the implementation of nutrition intervention at the local level," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:11:y:2022:i:7:p:322-330. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Umit Hacioglu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ssbffea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.