IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rbs/ijbrss/v11y2022i4p355-364.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Students’ views regarding the barriers to learning critical thinking

Author

Listed:
  • Ikenna Franklin Eze

    (Cape Peninsula University of Technology)

  • Chux Gervase Iwu

    (University of Western Cape)

  • Jobo Dubihlela

    (Cape Peninsula University of Technology)

Abstract

This paper aims to evaluate students’ feedback on the impediments to developing critical thinking in the classroom. Interpretative phenomenological analysis techniques were used to obtain data from postgraduate and undergraduate students of an Internal Auditing department in a South African university. The students identified several barriers to developing critical thinking in the classroom some of which are (1) the lecturers who are most times not knowledgeable in the field of critical thinking, (2) the students themselves who are simply not interested, (3) finally the educational system, according to the students who all argued that critical thinking is not ingrained in the country's educational institutions. According to the students, their lack of knowledge of critical thinking including the lecturers’ seeming insufficient knowledge of critical thinking calls for urgent intervention in the form of re-curriculation and training of lecturers. The findings of this research could have important implications for the auditing profession, as lecturers are often challenged to identify innovative ways to assist students in improving their critical thinking skills. Key Words: Critical thinking, Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis, Auditing Students, Qualitative Research, Focus Groups

Suggested Citation

  • Ikenna Franklin Eze & Chux Gervase Iwu & Jobo Dubihlela, 2022. "Students’ views regarding the barriers to learning critical thinking," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 11(4), pages 355-364, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:11:y:2022:i:4:p:355-364
    DOI: 10.20525/ijrbs.v11i4.1797
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijrbs/article/view/1797/1307
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v11i4.1797
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.20525/ijrbs.v11i4.1797?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Valdonė Indrašienė & Violeta Jegelevičienė & Odeta Merfeldaitė & Daiva Penkauskienė & Jolanta Pivorienė & Asta Railienė & Justinas Sadauskas & Natalija Valavičienė, 2021. "Linking Critical Thinking and Knowledge Management: A Conceptual Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-17, February.
    2. Carl Dahlman & Sam Mealy & Martin Wermelinger, 2016. "Harnessing the digital economy for developing countries," OECD Development Centre Working Papers 334, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Crystal Jia-Yi Lin, 2023. "General education competencies from students’ perspectives: a case study of a sports university in Taiwan," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-9, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhengge Tu & Jiayang Kong & Liping Sun & Botao Liu, 2024. "Can the Digital Economy Reduce the Rural-Urban Income Gap?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-19, January.
    2. Yuqi Zhu & Siwei Shen & Linyu Du & Jun Fu & Jian Zou & Lina Peng & Rui Ding, 2023. "Spatial and Temporal Interaction Coupling of Digital Economy, New-Type Urbanization and Land Ecology and Spatial Effects Identification: A Study of the Yangtze River Delta," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-27, March.
    3. Jingrong Tan & Lin Chen, 2022. "Spatial Effect of Digital Economy on Particulate Matter 2.5 in the Process of Smart Cities: Evidence from Prefecture-Level Cities in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-20, November.
    4. Myovella, Godwin & Karacuka, Mehmet & Haucap, Justus, 2020. "Digitalization and economic growth: A comparative analysis of Sub-Saharan Africa and OECD economies," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(2).
    5. Cristian MARCU & Carmen Nadia CIOCOIU & Alexandru PARU, 2020. "Digital Economy Development Phase: Retrospective Analysis On E-Businesses Across Europe," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 14(1), pages 400-409, November.
    6. Xu, Mo & Tao, Changqi & Zou, Xianya, 2024. "How do technology and institutional adaptability promote sustainable economic entrepreneurship and growth?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    7. Lee, Kangoh, 2023. "Working from home as an economic and social change: A review," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    8. Irfan, Erum & Ali, Yousaf & Sabir, Muhammad, 2022. "Analysing role of businesses’ investment in digital literacy: A case of Pakistan," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    9. Wei Zhang & Siqi Zhao & Xiaoyu Wan & Yuan Yao, 2021. "Study on the effect of digital economy on high-quality economic development in China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(9), pages 1-27, September.
    10. Qi, Songqiao & Sun, Tianmin, 2024. "Resource curse in OPEC with varied levels of financial regulations and constraints: The role of oil price shocks and digital finance," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    11. Claudiu George Bocean & Anca Antoaneta Vărzaru, 2023. "EU countries’ digital transformation, economic performance, and sustainability analysis," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, December.
    12. Zhao, Yantong & Said, Rusmawati & Ismail, Normaz Wana & Hamzah, Hanny Zurina, 2024. "Impact of industrial robot on labour productivity: Empirical study based on industry panel data," Innovation and Green Development, Elsevier, vol. 3(2).
    13. Georgeta Soava & Anca Mehedintu & Mihaela Sterpu, 2022. "Analysis and Forecast of the Use of E-Commerce in Enterprises of the European Union States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-29, July.
    14. Gao, Feng & He, Ziwen, 2024. "Digital economy, land resource misallocation and urban carbon emissions in Chinese resource-based cities," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    15. Mingyue Du & Siyu Ren, 2023. "Does the digital economy promote industrial green transformation? Evidence from spatial Durbin model," Journal of Information Economics, Anser Press, vol. 1(1), pages 1-17, January.
    16. Shuangying Chen & Qiyue Li & Bo Lei & Na Wang, 2021. "Configurational Analysis of the Driving Paths of Chinese Digital Economy Based on the Technology–Organization–Environment Framework," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, October.
    17. Zhaoqing Sun & Jianxu Liu & Roengchai Tansuchat, 2023. "China’s Digital Economy and Enterprise Labor Demand: The Mediating Effects of Green Technology Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-24, July.
    18. Kustanto, Andi, 2024. "Can ICT Diffusion Reduce Income Inequality for a Better Life? Evidence from Indonesian Provinces," Asian Journal of Applied Economics, Kasetsart University, Center for Applied Economics Research, vol. 31(1), January.
    19. Marketa Mlcuchova, 2022. "A Review of Platform Business Models," MENDELU Working Papers in Business and Economics 2022-80, Mendel University in Brno, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    20. Daniela Firoiu & Ramona Pîrvu & Elena Jianu & Laura Mariana Cismaș & Sorin Tudor & Gabriela Lățea, 2022. "Digital Performance in EU Member States in the Context of the Transition to a Climate Neutral Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-22, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:11:y:2022:i:4:p:355-364. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Umit Hacioglu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ssbffea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.