IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rbs/ijbrss/v11y2022i4p286-299.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Including the excluded in the integrated development planning process for improved community participation

Author

Listed:
  • John Mamokhere

    (University of Johannesburg, College of Business and Economics School of Public Management, Governance and Public Policy, Auckland Park Campus, South Africa)

  • Daniel F Meyer

    (University of Johannesburg, College of Business and Economics School of Public Management, Governance and Public Policy, Auckland Park Campus, South Africa)

Abstract

This article aims to assess the Integrated Development Planning (IDP) process for improved community participation. The IDP process was developed to improve strategic planning and community participation at the municipal level. Many South African municipalities have been struggling to use the IDP process to improve community participation. The methodology included 400 respondents who were chosen through a probability sampling technique and probed to complete the online survey using a closed-ended questionnaire guide, and ten respondents were also chosen through a non-probability sampling technique and were face-to-face interviewed using a semi-structured interview guide. The key findings revealed that poor community participation exists in the study area due to a lack of encouragement from responsible authorities. The Tzaneen municipality does not provide adequate feedback to the communities, and the inputs of the communities are not considered. There is a continuous lack of community consultation during the annual review of the IDP. The ineffective IDP process for improved community participation presents several challenges. Thus, this article concluded by providing a few recommendations to enhance the application of the IDP process and community participation. The Tzaneen municipal area should at all times uphold democratic principles by ensuring active public participation, transparency, and openness in municipal affairs. It also recommends making it easier for marginalised and previously disadvantaged people to participate in municipal policy and decision-making without prejudice. South African municipalities, including Tzaneen municipality, should develop and innovate institutional, and organisational capabilities to better utilise their resources, mitigate socio-economic challenges and enhance service delivery. Key Words:Community participation, Constitution, IDP Process, Tzaneen Municipal Area, South Africa

Suggested Citation

  • John Mamokhere & Daniel F Meyer, 2022. "Including the excluded in the integrated development planning process for improved community participation," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 11(4), pages 286-299, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:11:y:2022:i:4:p:286-299
    DOI: 10.20525/ijrbs.v11i4.1806
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijrbs/article/view/1806/1300
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v11i4.1806
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.20525/ijrbs.v11i4.1806?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. France Khutso Lavhelani Kgobe & John Mamokhere, 2021. "The Value of Public Participation in Land-Use Planning for Redeeming Congestion in South African Municipalities," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 26(1), pages 17-31, Decembrie.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. John Mamokhere, 2022. "Accountability, inclusivity, effectiveness, and leaving no one behind: An exploration of effective governance principles in ensuring clean water and sanitation in South African municipalities," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 11(10), pages 191-205, December.
    2. John Mamokhere, 2022. "Pragmatic implementation and promotion of good governance principles in realizing Sustainable Development Goal Six (6) in South Africa," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 11(6), pages 20-32, September.
    3. John Mamokhere, 2023. "Sending a message to the top: the influence of service delivery protests on service delivery planning in South African municipalities," Insights into Regional Development, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 5(2), pages 60-71, June.
    4. John Mamokhere & Daniel Francois Meyer, 2023. "Towards an Exploration of the Significance of Community Participation in the Integrated Development Planning Process in South Africa," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-17, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. John Mamokhere, 2022. "Leaving no one behind in a participative integrated development planning process in South Africa," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 11(10), pages 277-291, December.
    2. Mohammed Faez Hasan & Noor Salah Abdelnaby Al-Ramadan, 2022. "Using Options Futures Derivatives Weather in Hedging," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 31(1), pages 430-436, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:11:y:2022:i:4:p:286-299. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Umit Hacioglu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ssbffea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.