IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rbs/ijbrss/v10y2021i4p275-287.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Auditors’ professional skepticism and fraud detection

Author

Listed:
  • Fauzia Agustina

    (Accounting Department, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia)

  • Nurkholis Nurkholis

    (Accounting Department, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia)

  • Mohamad Khoiru Rusydi

    (Accounting Department, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia)

Abstract

This study aims to examine the effect of competence, independence, experience, and audit time pressure on fraud detection by using the mediation of professional skepticism in the context of internal auditors for the public sector. The research data were obtained through a survey questionnaire on 173 auditors of the Inspectorate General of the Ministry of Education and Culture. The analysis technique in this study used Partial Least Square (PLS). The results showed that competence, independence and audit time pressure had no effect on the ability to detect fraud. Meanwhile, the auditor's experience and professional skepticism had a positive effect on fraud detection. The application of professional skepticism was proven as a mediating variable in the effect of competence, independence, experience and audit time pressure on fraud detection. Auditors’ competence, independence, and experience had a positive effect on professional skepticism and audit time pressure had a negative effect on professional skepticism. The results of this study provide an input that the importance of applying professional skepticism could improve fraud detection. Key Words: fraud detection, professional skepticism, auditor competence, auditor independence, auditor experience, audit time pressure

Suggested Citation

  • Fauzia Agustina & Nurkholis Nurkholis & Mohamad Khoiru Rusydi, 2021. "Auditors’ professional skepticism and fraud detection," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 10(4), pages 275-287, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:10:y:2021:i:4:p:275-287
    DOI: 10.20525/ijrbs.v10i4.1214
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijrbs/article/view/1214/924
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v10i4.1214
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.20525/ijrbs.v10i4.1214?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Braun, Robert L., 2000. "The effect of time pressure on auditor attention to qualitative aspects of misstatements indicative of potential fraudulent financial reporting," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 243-259, April.
    2. Abdolmohammadi, Mohammad J. & Shanteau, James, 1992. "Personal attributes of expert auditors," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 53(2), pages 158-172, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kathryn Kadous & Yuepin (Daniel) Zhou, 2019. "How Does Intrinsic Motivation Improve Auditor Judgment in Complex Audit Tasks?," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(1), pages 108-131, March.
    2. Liao, Fang-nan & Zhang, Chuancai & Zhang, Jin-jin & Yan, Xiang & Chen, Tian-xiang, 2024. "Hyperbole or reality? The effect of auditors' AI education on audit report timeliness," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    3. Lambert, Tamara A. & Jones, Keith L. & Brazel, Joseph F. & Showalter, D. Scott, 2017. "Audit time pressure and earnings quality: An examination of accelerated filings," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 50-66.
    4. Coller, Maribeth & Tuttle, Brad, 2002. "The acquisition of price-relevant domain knowledge by a market," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 77-101, February.
    5. Serge Valant Gandja, 2013. "Audit légal et perception de la qualité des travaux dans une économie en développement," Post-Print hal-00999706, HAL.
    6. Jessen L. Hobson & William J. Mayew & Mark E. Peecher & Mohan Venkatachalam, 2017. "Improving Experienced Auditors’ Detection of Deception in CEO Narratives," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(5), pages 1137-1166, December.
    7. Mauksch, Stefanie & von der Gracht, Heiko A. & Gordon, Theodore J., 2020. "Who is an expert for foresight? A review of identification methods," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    8. Yan Luo & Steven E. Salterio, 2021. "Toward an Archival Measure of the Likelihood of Auditor‐Client Management Negotiation: An Exploration of the Audit Lag Measures Conjecture†," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(1), pages 109-143, March.
    9. Calabrese, Kristyn, 2023. "The effects of time pressure on audit fees," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    10. Sawsan Halbouni & Asifa Yasin, 2016. "Risk Disclosure: Empirical Investigation of UAE Companies’ Compliance with International Accounting Standards," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(8), pages 134-134, July.
    11. Hope, Ole-Kristian & Li, Congcong & Lin, An-Ping & Rabier, MaryJane, 2021. "Happy analysts," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    12. Stone, Dan N. & Hunton, James E. & Wier, Benson, 2000. "Succeeding in managerial accounting. Part 1: knowledge, ability, and rank," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 25(7), pages 697-715, October.
    13. Razana Juhaida Johari & Nordayana Sri Ridzoan & Arumega Zarefar, 2019. "The Influence of Work Overload, Time Pressure and Social Influence Pressure on Auditors¡¯ Job Performance," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 10(3), pages 88-106, May.
    14. Solomon, Ira & Trotman, Ken T., 2003. "Experimental judgment and decision research in auditing: the first 25 years of AOS," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 395-412, May.
    15. Cohen, Jeffrey & Ding, Yuan & Lesage, Cedric & Stolowy, Hervé, 2008. "The role of managers’ behavior in corporate fraud," HEC Research Papers Series 900, HEC Paris.
    16. Hubert Tondeur, 2003. "Les déterminants de la qualité des missions de commissariat aux comptes," Post-Print halshs-00582819, HAL.
    17. Anna M. Cianci & James Lloyd Bierstaker, 2009. "The effect of performance feedback and client importance on auditors' self- and public-focused ethical judgments," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 24(5), pages 455-474, May.
    18. Maria Krambia-Kapardis & Chris Christodoulou & Michalis Agathocleous, 2010. "Neural networks: the panacea in fraud detection?," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 25(7), pages 659-678, July.
    19. Joseph F. Brazel & Christopher P. Agoglia, 2007. "An Examination of Auditor Planning Judgements in a Complex Accounting Information System Environment," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(4), pages 1059-1083, December.
    20. Christopher Koch & Annette Koehler & Kristina Yankova, 2016. "Professional Skepticism and Auditor Judgment: Does Trait Skepticism Mitigate the Recency Bias?," Working Papers 1623, Gutenberg School of Management and Economics, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, revised 2016.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rbs:ijbrss:v:10:y:2021:i:4:p:275-287. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Umit Hacioglu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ssbffea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.