IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/rfreco/rfeco_0769-0479_1996_num_11_2_1003.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Les justifications en faveur de l'allocation universelle : une présentation critique

Author

Listed:
  • Philippe Quirion

Abstract

[fre] Défendue par de nombreux auteurs, l'allocation universelle est un projet consistant à attribuer à tous les citoyens une prestation à la fois inconditionnelle et cumulable avec toute autre ressource. Cet article construit une typologie des nombreuses justifications qui ont été apportées à l'appui de cette proposition, et les soumet à un examen critique. Les justifications qui font de l'allocation universelle un remède au chômage, et donc un moyen d'assurer le droit du travail, apparaissent peu fondées. Aussi, seules subsistent les justifications qui font de l'allocation universelle un moyen d'assurer le droit à la paresse, revendication que l'on peut trouver légitime mais dont la crédibilité politique est douteuse. [eng] The universal grant proposal has been championed by many authors. It consists in supplying each citizen with a benefit which is unconditional and can be drawn concurrently to every other resource. This paper builds a typology of the various justifications that have been provided for this proposal, and submits them to a critical examination. Justifications in which a universal grant is a cure for unemployment and thus a way to provide a right to work appear to be weakly-founded. Hence, the only remaining justifications are those for which a universal grant is a way to provide a right to idleness, claim that can be founded legitimate, but whose political credibility is doubtful.

Suggested Citation

  • Philippe Quirion, 1996. "Les justifications en faveur de l'allocation universelle : une présentation critique," Revue Française d'Économie, Programme National Persée, vol. 11(2), pages 45-64.
    • Handle: RePEc:prs:rfreco:rfeco_0769-0479_1996_num_11_2_1003
    DOI: 10.3406/rfeco.1996.1003
    Note: DOI:10.3406/rfeco.1996.1003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/rfeco.1996.1003
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/rfeco_0769-0479_1996_num_11_2_1003
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3406/rfeco.1996.1003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joan Robinson, 1953. "The Production Function and the Theory of Capital," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 21(2), pages 81-106.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Santos, João & Domingos, Tiago & Sousa, Tânia & St. Aubyn, Miguel, 2016. "Does a small cost share reflect a negligible role for energy in economic production? Testing for aggregate production functions including capital, labor, and useful exergy through a cointegration-base," MPRA Paper 70850, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Garbellini, Nadia, 2020. "Measurement without theory, and theory without measurement: What's wrong with Piketty's capital in the XXI century?," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 50-62.
    3. Mazouch, P. & Krejčí, I., 2016. "The Analysis of the Age Structure of Regional Fixed Capital in the Agriculture," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 8(2), pages 1-13, June.
    4. Blair Fix, 2019. "The Aggregation Problem: Implications for Ecological and Biophysical Economics," Biophysical Economics and Resource Quality, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 1-15, March.
    5. Jaime Páez Méndez, 2013. "Las contribuciones de Joan Robinson a la teoría económica y su vigencia," Documentos de Investigación - Economía 14058, Universidad Central.
    6. Jürgen Bitzer & Erkan Gören, 2016. "Measuring capital services by energy use: an empirical comparative study," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(53), pages 5152-5167, November.
    7. Mauro Boianovsky, 1998. "Wicksell, Ramsey and the theory of interest," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(1), pages 140-168.
    8. Martin Hellwig, 2021. "Der Zinssatz ist kein Preis [The Interest Rate Should not be Interpreted as a Price]," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 101(11), pages 862-869, November.
    9. Avi J. Cohen, 2003. "Retrospectives: Whatever Happened to the Cambridge Capital Theory Controversies?," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 17(1), pages 199-214, Winter.
    10. Kakarot-Handtke, Egmont, 2011. "Squaring the investment cycle," MPRA Paper 32895, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Moldaschl, Manfred, 2010. "Why innovation theories make no sense," Papers and Preprints of the Department of Innovation Research and Sustainable Resource Management 9/2010, Chemnitz University of Technology, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    12. Matthew K. Heun & João Santos & Paul E. Brockway & Randall Pruim & Tiago Domingos & Marco Sakai, 2017. "From Theory to Econometrics to Energy Policy: Cautionary Tales for Policymaking Using Aggregate Production Functions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-44, February.
    13. Fix, Blair, 2017. "Evidence for a Power Theory of Personal Income Distribution," Working Papers on Capital as Power 2017/03, Capital As Power - Toward a New Cosmology of Capitalism.
    14. Giuseppe Fontana & Bill Gerrard, 2006. "The future of Post Keynesian economics," BNL Quarterly Review, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro, vol. 59(236), pages 49-80.
    15. Fix, Blair, 2014. "Rethinking Profit: How Redistribution Drives Growth," Working Papers on Capital as Power 2014/02, Capital As Power - Toward a New Cosmology of Capitalism.
    16. Di Matteo, Massimo & Filippi, Francesco & Sordi, Serena, 2006. "`The confessions of an unrepentant model builder': Rummaging in Goodwin's Archive," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 17(4), pages 400-414, December.
    17. Harvey Gram & Geoffrey Harcourt, 2015. "Joan Robinson and MIT," Working Papers 9, City University of New York Graduate Center, Ph.D. Program in Economics.
    18. Fix, Blair, 2018. "The Trouble With Human Capital Theory," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, issue 86, pages 15-32.
    19. Yara Zeineddine, 2021. "Institutional Aspects of Capital in Joan Robinson's 'Rules of the Game': Rentier versus Entrepreneurs in Managerial Capitalism," Working Papers hal-03230146, HAL.
    20. Fix, Blair, 2018. "The aggregation problem: Implications for ecological economics," Working Papers on Capital as Power 2018/03, Capital As Power - Toward a New Cosmology of Capitalism.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:rfreco:rfeco_0769-0479_1996_num_11_2_1003. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/rfeco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.