IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/reveco/reco_0035-2764_1983_num_34_2_408713.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pour une approche structurale en économie

Author

Listed:
  • Manfred Gilli
  • Gilbert Ritschard
  • Daniel Royer

Abstract

[fre] L'article propose une revue d'ensemble des méthodes d'analyse structurale des modèles économiques. Il traite d'abord de l'étude des structures causales (caractérisées par la présence ou l'absence de certaines variables dans chaque relation), mettant en évidence et justifiant les différents types de formes récursives et de séparabilité qui peuvent s'en déduire. L'apport des structures qualitatives est ensuite abordé, qui tient compte du signe des relations d'influence entre les différentes composantes du modèle. En ce sens, les conclusions les plus significatives portent sur les classes de variables liées qualitativement.. Après avoir cerné les limites que rencontre l'analyse de ces deux types de structures, l'article aborde l'étude des structures linéaires par intervalle. Différentes méthodes d'exploration des figures géométriques qui s'en déduisent sont alors proposées, et les résultats obtenus sont interprétés en termes de statique comparative généralisée et d'analyse multicritère. [eng] Towards a structural approach in economics . Manfred Gilli, Gilbert Ritschahd Et Daniel Royer. The article is concerned with a general survey of various structural methods that can be applied to economic models. It first deals with the causal structures (defined by the presence or absence of variables in each relation), emphasizing and justifying the various types of recursive forms and separability properties whisch can be deduced. The scope of qualitative structures is then considered, which take into account the sign of the influence relationships among the various components of the model. In this respect, the most significant conclusions concern the classes of qualitatively linked variables.. After emphasizing the limits encountered in the analysis of these structures, the article takes up the study of linear interval structures. Various methods for exploring the geometric figures that arise from this type of structure are proposed, and the results are interpreted in term of generalized comparative static and multiple criteria analyses.

Suggested Citation

  • Manfred Gilli & Gilbert Ritschard & Daniel Royer, 1983. "Pour une approche structurale en économie," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 34(2), pages 277-304.
    • Handle: RePEc:prs:reveco:reco_0035-2764_1983_num_34_2_408713
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/reco_0035-2764_1983_num_34_2_408713
    Download Restriction: Data and metadata provided by Persée are licensed under a Creative Commons "Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0" License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Edouard Rossier, 1982. "The geometry of economic knowledge," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 297-311, August.
    2. Jean-Pascal Benassy, 1975. "Neo-Keynesian Disequilibrium Theory in a Monetary Economy," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 42(4), pages 503-523.
    3. Kelvin Lancaster, 1966. "The Solution of Qualitative Comparative Static Problems," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 80(2), pages 278-295.
    4. Fisher, Franklin M, 1970. "A Correspondence Principle for Simultaneous Equation Models," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 38(1), pages 73-92, January.
    5. Ritschard, Gilbert, 1983. "Computable Qualitative Comparative Static Techniques," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 51(4), pages 1145-1168, July.
    6. Gilli, M & Ritschard, G, 1978. "A Program for Causal and Qualitative Analysis of Economic," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 46(2), pages 477-478, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lady, George M. & Buck, Andrew J., 2011. "Structural models, information and inherited restrictions," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 2820-2831.
    2. Lady, George M., 1995. "Robust economic models," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 481-501, April.
    3. Andrew J. Buck & George M. Lady, 2015. "A New Approach to Model Verification, Falsification and Selection," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 3(3), pages 1-28, June.
    4. Ichiishi, Tatsuro, 1985. "Management versus ownership, II," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 115-138, March.
    5. Herings, P. J. J. & Polemarchakis, H., 2002. "Equilibrium and arbitrage in incomplete asset markets with fixed prices," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 133-155, April.
    6. Eizo Kawai, 2019. "Toward Rebuilding of Modern Macroeconomic Theory: Market Failure in a Macro Economy and Keynes's Unemployment Equilibrium," Working Papers e138, Tokyo Center for Economic Research.
    7. Fudenberg, Drew & Levine, David K., 2009. "Self-confirming equilibrium and the Lucas critique," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 144(6), pages 2354-2371, November.
    8. Babenko, R. & Talman, A.J.J., 2006. "Quantity Constrained General Equilibrium," Other publications TiSEM 393bf7c1-3045-4a3b-b3c3-5, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    9. Gerard Ballot & Antoine Mandel & Annick Vignes, 2015. "Agent-based modeling and economic theory: where do we stand?," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 10(2), pages 199-220, October.
    10. J. Peter Neary & Joseph E. Stiglitz, 1979. "Towards A Reconstruction of Keynesian Economics: Expectations and Constrained Equilibria," NBER Working Papers 0376, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    11. Ivan Boldyrev & Olessia Kirtchik, 2014. "General Equilibrium Theory behind the Iron Curtain: The Case of Victor Polterovich," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 46(3), pages 435-461, Fall.
    12. Volker Böhm & Tomoo Kikuchi, 2002. "Dynamics of Endogenous Business Cycles and Exchange Rate Volatility," CESifo Working Paper Series 797, CESifo.
    13. Bevan, D. & Collier, P. & Gunning, J.W., 1985. "Supply response and money demand in a peasant economy with rationing and risk," Serie Research Memoranda 0026, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    14. Gilányi, Zsolt, 2008. "Az uralkodó pénzelmélet alapproblémái - a készpénzfedezeti korlátok problémájáról [Underlying problems with the current theory of money - the problem of cash-cover limits]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(2), pages 136-148.
    15. Herings, P.J.J., 2024. "Expectational Equilibria and Drèze Equilibria in Many-to-one Matching Models," Other publications TiSEM 2818f6ae-f3b0-4b5e-9222-a, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    16. Christian Calmès, 2003. "Poignée de main invisible et persistance des cycles économiques : une revue de la littérature," Staff Working Papers 03-40, Bank of Canada.
    17. Gordon, Robert J, 1981. "Output Fluctuations and Gradual Price Adjustment," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 19(2), pages 493-530, June.
    18. Antoine Mandel & Vipin Veetil, 2020. "The Economic Cost of COVID Lockdowns: An Out-of-Equilibrium Analysis," Economics of Disasters and Climate Change, Springer, vol. 4(3), pages 431-451, October.
    19. Gauthier T. Kashalala & Steven F. Koch, 2014. "The Economic Approach to Fertility: A Causal Mediation Analysis," Working Papers 201434, University of Pretoria, Department of Economics.
    20. Miller, Marcus & Driffill, John, 2011. "Liquidity When It Matters Most: QE and Tobin?s q," CEPR Discussion Papers 8511, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:reveco:reco_0035-2764_1983_num_34_2_408713. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/reco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.