IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/recofi/ecofi_0987-3368_2002_num_66_2_3745.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

La Mise en œuvre conjointe du protocole de Kyoto, un double dividende pour la France et pour les Pays d'Europe Centrale et Orientale

Author

Listed:
  • Jean-Joseph Boillot
  • Alexis Mariani

Abstract

[fre] Des nombreuses initiatives relatives à la MOC qui existent déjà à l’étranger, il s’agit d’en chercher le schéma optimal et d’estimer les enjeux financiers de sa mise en oeuvre, ou de sa non mise en oeuvre. Ceux-ci doivent être évalués selon les critères qui font de la MOC un mécanisme essentiel : d’une part la minimisation des coûts de respect du protocole de Kyoto, d’autre part la maximisation de la présence française à l’Est. L’étude conclut que le registre est le système optimal dans l’hypothèse centrale d’un signal prix crédible sur le carbone. Sa mise en place nécessiterait peu d’aménagements par rapport à la situation actuelle et minimiserait la contrainte budgétaire. Un fonds serait un optimum de second rang. Enfin l’étude tente d’évaluer l’intérêt financier pour la France d’une mise en place rapide de la MOC. . Classification JEL : K32, Q01, Q25 [eng] The joint implementation of the Kyoto protocol, a double dividend for France and the countries of Central and Eastern Europe . Numerous initiatives that relate to the MOC which already exists overseas, and which relate to the identification of the optimal schema and the estimation of the financial stakes involved in its implementation or its non-implementation. These must be assessed on the basis of the criteria which make the MOC an essential mechanism : on the one hand the minimising of the costs involved in fulfilling the obligations under the Kyoto protocol and on the other the maximising of French presence in the East. The report concludes that the register is the best system in the central hypothesis of a credible price signal on carbon. Its implementation would need few adjustments in relation to the current situation and would minimize the budgetary constraint. A fund would be a second ranking option. Finally, the study sought to assess the financial interest for France in the rapid implementation of the MOC. . JEL classifications : K32, Q01, Q25

Suggested Citation

  • Jean-Joseph Boillot & Alexis Mariani, 2002. "La Mise en œuvre conjointe du protocole de Kyoto, un double dividende pour la France et pour les Pays d'Europe Centrale et Orientale," Revue d'Économie Financière, Programme National Persée, vol. 66(2), pages 101-118.
    • Handle: RePEc:prs:recofi:ecofi_0987-3368_2002_num_66_2_3745
    DOI: 10.3406/ecofi.2002.3745
    Note: DOI:10.3406/ecofi.2002.3745
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/ecofi.2002.3745
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/ecofi_0987-3368_2002_num_66_2_3745
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3406/ecofi.2002.3745?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Buch, Claudia M. & Piazolo, Daniel, 2001. "Capital and trade flows in Europe and the impact of enlargement," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 183-214, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Virag-Neumann, Ildiko, 2015. "Impacts of EU Enlargement Process: A Gravity Model Approach," Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference (2015), Kotor, Montengero, in: Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA - ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference, Kotor, Montengero, 10-11 September 2015, pages 453-460, IRENET - Society for Advancing Innovation and Research in Economy, Zagreb.
    2. Joze Damijan & José de Sousa & Olivier Lamotte, 2010. "Trade Liberalization in Southeastern Europe," Chapters, in: Robert E.B. Lucas & Lyn Squire & T. N. Srinivasan (ed.), Global Exchange and Poverty, chapter 4, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. José Manuel Martins Caetano & Aurora Galego, 2003. "An Analysis of Actual and Potential Trade between the EU Countries and the Eastern European Countries," Economics Working Papers 3_2003, University of Évora, Department of Economics (Portugal).
    4. Piazolo, Daniel & Kokta, Robert M. & Buch, Claudia M., 2001. "Does the East Get What Would Otherwise Flow to the South? FDI Diversion in Europe," Kiel Working Papers 1061, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    5. J. Caetano & A. Galego & E. Vaz & C. Vieira & I. Vieira, 2002. "The Eastward Enlargement of the Eurozone: Trade and FDI," Eastward Enlargement of the Euro-zone Working Papers wp07, Free University Berlin, Jean Monnet Centre of Excellence, revised 01 Aug 2002.
    6. Ehrlich, Laura, 2002. "The EU Single Market and Customs Policy: Impact on Estonian Foreign Trade," Discussion Papers 797, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
    7. Horst Siebert, 2002. "Europe – Quo Vadis? Reflections on the Future Institutional Framework of the European Union," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(1), pages 1-32, January.
    8. Florian Neagu, 2003. "Net Foreign Assets Management and Capital Account Liberalization. The Romanian Case," Others 0311001, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Zsóka Kóczán, 2018. "Late to the Game? Capital Flows to the Western Balkans," Croatian Economic Survey, The Institute of Economics, Zagreb, vol. 20(2), pages 33-67, December.
    10. Helena Marques & Hugh Metcalf, 2003. "Extending the EU Single Market Eastwards: Sectoral Trade and Real Wage Effects," Discussion Paper Series 2003_10, Department of Economics, Loughborough University, revised Oct 2003.
    11. Martin, Carmela & Turrion, Jaime, 2003. "The Trade Impact of the Integration of the Central and Eastern European Countries on the European Union," Journal of Economic Integration, Center for Economic Integration, Sejong University, vol. 18, pages 288-306.
    12. Haselmann, Rainer & Helmut, Herwartz, 2005. "The Introduction of the Euro and its Effects on Investment Decisions," Economics Working Papers 2005-15, Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Department of Economics.
    13. Curran, Louise & Zignago, Soledad, 2012. "EU enlargement and the evolution of European production networks," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 240-257.
    14. Gül, ERTAN ÖZGÜZER, 2007. "May Free Capital mobility before accession be unfavorable for admission to the EU ?," Discussion Papers (ECON - Département des Sciences Economiques) 2007035, Université catholique de Louvain, Département des Sciences Economiques.
    15. Lukas Mohler & Michael Seitz, 2012. "The gains from variety in the European Union," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 148(3), pages 475-500, September.
    16. Oxana Babecká Kucharčuková & Jan Babecký & Martin Raiser, 2012. "Gravity Approach for Modelling International Trade in South-Eastern Europe and the Commonwealth of Independent States: The Role of Geography, Policy and Institutions," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 277-301, April.
    17. Wilfried Altzinger & Peter Egger & Peter Huber & Kurt Kratena & Michael Pfaffermayr & Michael Wüger, 2000. "Teilprojekt 5: Transnationale Direktinvestitionen und Kooperationen," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 19587.
    18. Farha Fatema & Mohammad Monirul Islam, 2020. "Driving Forces of Marine Fisheries and Seafood Export of Bangladesh: Augmented Gravity Model Approach," Asian Journal of Economic Modelling, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 8(2), pages 106-122, June.
    19. Mitze, Timo & Breidenbach, Philipp, 2018. "Economic integration and growth at the margin: A space-time incremental impact analysis," Ruhr Economic Papers 775, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    20. Peter Nunnenkamp, 2002. "Die Auswirkungen der EU-Osterweiterung auf die Direktinvestitionen und deren Rückwirkungen," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 55(11), pages 13-19, June.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • K32 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - Energy, Environmental, Health, and Safety Law
    • Q01 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General - - - Sustainable Development
    • Q25 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Water
    • K32 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - Energy, Environmental, Health, and Safety Law
    • Q01 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General - - - Sustainable Development
    • Q25 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Water

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:recofi:ecofi_0987-3368_2002_num_66_2_3745. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/ecofi .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.