IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/recofi/ecofi_0987-3368_2001_hos_6_1_3925.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

L'insuffisance de l'explication légale pour rendre compte des difficultés de la transition russe en matière de « corporate governance »

Author

Listed:
  • Mathilde Mesnard

Abstract

[eng] Why the Legal Argument Falls Short of Explaining the Corporate Governance Problems in the Russian Transition . It is easy to get a well-detailed and documented picture of the different ways in which corporate governance, in Russia, has failed. There are, however, very few analysis that go explicitly into what mechanisms brought about this failure. One of the first major thesis has been the legal explanation. The aim of this article is to refute the legal argument or at least to show how it falls short of explaining this failure. We first outline the legal argument as it was recently developed in different texts, highlighting its theoretical stakes. We analyse the main legal problems in the Russian transition, as well as the origins of these problems. To achieve this, legal evolutions are discussed, and the main obstacles to a satisfactory legal development are shown. The point is to show how the problems in Russian legal development are for the most part endogenous to the transition process. . JEL classifications : G30, K20, P20 [fre] Il est facile de rendre compte des manifestations de l’échec de la corporate governance russe. En revanche, peu d’études permettent d’analyser les mécanismes ayant conduit à cet échec. Une première interprétation a été le recours à l’explication légale. Notre article s’attache à montrer l’insuffisance de cet argument. Nous exposons, tout d’abord, cet argument tel qu’il s’est développé récemment dans la littérature, en mettant en évidence ses enjeux théoriques. Puis nous analysons les principales difficultés légales de la transition russe, ainsi que les origines de ces difficultés. Pour ce faire, nous faisons le point sur les évolutions récentes du cadre juridique, puis nous exposons les principaux obstacles à un développement légal satisfaisant. Nous mettons enfin en évidence les particularités de la Russie en matière juridique ainsi que les déterminants de ses difficultés légales. . Classification JEL : G30, K20, P20

Suggested Citation

  • Mathilde Mesnard, 2001. "L'insuffisance de l'explication légale pour rendre compte des difficultés de la transition russe en matière de « corporate governance »," Revue d'Économie Financière, Programme National Persée, vol. 6(1), pages 519-542.
    • Handle: RePEc:prs:recofi:ecofi_0987-3368_2001_hos_6_1_3925
    DOI: 10.3406/ecofi.2001.3925
    Note: DOI:10.3406/ecofi.2001.3925
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/ecofi.2001.3925
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/ecofi_0987-3368_2001_hos_6_1_3925
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3406/ecofi.2001.3925?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Katharina Pistor & Martin Raiser & Stanislaw Gelfer, 2000. "Law and Finance in Transition Economies," The Economics of Transition, The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, vol. 8(2), pages 325-368, July.
    2. Jensen, Michael C. & Meckling, William H., 1976. "Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 305-360, October.
    3. Zhuravskaya, Ekaterina & Lambert-Mogiliansky, Ariane & Sonin, Konstantin, 2000. "Capture of Bankruptcy: Theory and Evidence from Russia," CEPR Discussion Papers 2488, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    4. Katharina Pistor, 2000. "Patterns of legal change: shareholder and creditor rights in transition economies," Working Papers 49, European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, Office of the Chief Economist.
    5. Alexander Blankenagel, 2000. "Legal Reforms in Russia: Visible Steps, Obvious Gaps, and an Invisible Hand?," Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 156(1), pages 1-99, March.
    6. Michael Alexeev, 1999. "The effect of privatization on wealth distribution in Russia," The Economics of Transition, The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, vol. 7(2), pages 449-465, July.
    7. Mathilde Mesnard, 1999. "Emergence des groupes et Corporate Governance en Russie," Economie Internationale, CEPII research center, issue 77, pages 131-160.
    8. Joseph Stiglitz, 1999. "Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes?," Challenge, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(6), pages 26-67, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mathilde Mesnard, 2001. "Why the Legal Argument Falls Short of Explaining the Corporate Governance Problems in the Russian Transition," Revue d'Économie Financière, Programme National Persée, vol. 6(1), pages 477-497.
    2. Kolecek, Ludek, 2008. "Bankruptcy laws and debt renegotiation," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 4(1), pages 40-61, April.
    3. Burkart, Mike & Panunzi, Fausto, 2006. "Agency conflicts, ownership concentration, and legal shareholder protection," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 1-31, January.
    4. repec:zbw:bofrdp:2011_005 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Fang, Yiwei & Hasan, Iftekhar & Marton, Katherin & Waisman, Maya, 2014. "Bank valuation in new EU member countries," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 55-72.
    6. Klapper, Leora & Laeven, Luc & Love, Inessa, 2006. "Corporate governance provisions and firm ownership: Firm-level evidence from Eastern Europe," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 429-444, April.
    7. Klapper, Leora F & Laeven, Luc & Love, Inessa, 2005. "What drives corporate governance? Firm-level evidence from Eastern Europe," Policy Research Working Paper Series 3600, The World Bank.
    8. Fang, Yiwei & Hasan, Iftekhar & Marton, Katherin, 2011. "Bank efficiency in transition economies : recent evidence from South-Eastern Europe," Research Discussion Papers 5/2011, Bank of Finland.
    9. repec:zbw:bofrdp:2011_007 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Fang, Yiwei & Hasan, Iftekhar & Marton, Katherin, 2011. "Market reforms, legal changes and bank risk-taking: evidence from transition economies," Bank of Finland Research Discussion Papers 7/2011, Bank of Finland.
    11. Fang, Yiwei & Hasan, Iftekhar & Marton, Katherin, 2011. "Market reforms, legal changes and bank risk-taking : evidence from transition economies," Research Discussion Papers 7/2011, Bank of Finland.
    12. Fang, Yiwei & Hasan, Iftekhar & Marton, Katherin, 2014. "Institutional development and bank stability: Evidence from transition countries," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 160-176.
    13. Fang, Yiwei & Hasan, Iftekhar & Marton, Katherin, 2011. "Bank efficiency in transition economies: recent evidence from South-Eastern Europe," Bank of Finland Research Discussion Papers 5/2011, Bank of Finland.
    14. Katharina Pistor & Martin Raiser & Stanislaw Gelfer, 2000. "Law and Finance in Transition Economies," The Economics of Transition, The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, vol. 8(2), pages 325-368, July.
    15. Aguilera, Ruth V. & Desender, Kurt A. & Kabbach de Castro, Luiz Ricardo, 2011. "A Configurational Approach to Comparative Corporate Governance," Working Papers 11-0103, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Business.
    16. Buchen, Clemens, 2010. "Emerging economic systems in Central and Eastern Europe – a qualitative and quantitative assessment," EconStor Theses, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, number 37141, September.
    17. Art Durnev & E. Han Kim, 2005. "To Steal or Not to Steal: Firm Attributes, Legal Environment, and Valuation," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 60(3), pages 1461-1493, June.
    18. Nguyen, Thi Tuyet Mai, 2017. "An examination of independent directors in Vietnam," OSF Preprints ay6dv, Center for Open Science.
    19. Nina Cankar & Simon Deakin & Marko Simoneti, 2008. "The Reflexive Properties of Corporate Governance Codes: The Reception of the 'Comply or Explain' Approach in Slovenia," Working Papers wp371, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
    20. Guriev, Sergei & Makarov, Igor & Maurel, Mathilde, 2002. "Debt Overhang and Barter in Russia," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 635-656, December.
    21. Irina Denisova & Stanislav Kolenikov & Ksenia Yudaeva, 2000. "Child Benefits and Child Poverty," Working Papers w0006, Center for Economic and Financial Research (CEFIR).
    22. Katharina Pistor, "undated". "Addressing Deterrence and Regulatory Failure in Emerging Stock Markets," American Law & Economics Association Annual Meetings 1092, American Law & Economics Association.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • G30 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - General
    • K20 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - General
    • P20 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Socialist and Transition Economies - - - General
    • G30 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - General
    • K20 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - General
    • P20 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Socialist and Transition Economies - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:recofi:ecofi_0987-3368_2001_hos_6_1_3925. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/ecofi .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.