IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/ecoprv/ecop_0249-4744_1993_num_107_1_5600.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

La persistance du déficit commercial américain dans les années 1980

Author

Listed:
  • Yannick L'Horty
  • Kim Sébastien Pham

Abstract

[spa] Persistencia del déficit comercial estadounidense, . por Yannick L'Horty y Kim Sébastien Pham.. . La balanza comercial de los Estados Unidos lleva acumulados más de diez años consecutivos de déficits y su recuperación progresiva, inidada en 1986, comenzó a perder fuerza a prindpios de los años 90. Para explicar los movimientos de las balanzas comertiales, suelen ponerse de relieve dos printipios determinantes: la differencia de coyuntura y la competitividad-precios. Por último se analiza y discute la contribución de estos principios a la evolución del déficit estadounidense desde printipios de los años 80. [ger] Das anhaltende amerikanische Handelsdefizit, . von Yannick L'Horty, Kim Sébastien Pham.. . Seit mehr als zehn Jahren häuft die Handelsbilanz der Vereinigten Staaten ununterbrochen Defizit um Defizit an. Der 1986 begonnene allmähliche Abbau ist jedoch Anfang der 90er Jahre wieder ins Stocken geraten. Zur Erklärung der Handelsbilanzbewegungen werden gewöhnlich zwei Hauptdeterminanten angeführt: der konjunkturelle "Lag" und die Preiswettbewerbsfähigkeit. In diesem Artikel werden nun die Auswirkungen dieser beiden Determinanten auf die Entwicklung des amerikanischen Defizits seit Anfang der 80er Jahre analysiert und diskutiert. [fre] La persistance du déficit commercial américain dans les années 1980, . par Yannick L'Horty, Kim Sébastien Pham.. . La balance commerciale des États-Unis cumule plus de dix années consécutives de déficits, et son redressement progressif, amorcé en 1986, s'essoufle au début des années 1990. Pour expliquer les mouvements des balances commerciales, deux principaux déterminants sont traditionnellement mis en avant : le décalage de conjoncture et la compétitivité prix. Les contributions de ces déterminants à l'évolution du déficit américain depuis le début des années 1980 sont analysées et discutées. [eng] The Enduring American Trade Deficit, . by Yannick L'Horty and Kim Sébastien Pham.. . The United States trade deficit is the result of ten consecutive years of deficits. Its gradual decrease, which started in 1986, is now tailing off in the early 1990s. Two main deciding factors are traditionally put forward to explain movements in balances of trade: the business lag and price competitiveness. The contributions of these determining factors to the development of the American deficit since the beginning of the 1980s are analyzed and discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Yannick L'Horty & Kim Sébastien Pham, 1993. "La persistance du déficit commercial américain dans les années 1980," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 107(1), pages 91-103.
    • Handle: RePEc:prs:ecoprv:ecop_0249-4744_1993_num_107_1_5600
    DOI: 10.3406/ecop.1993.5600
    Note: DOI:10.3406/ecop.1993.5600
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3406/ecop.1993.5600
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/ecop_0249-4744_1993_num_107_1_5600
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3406/ecop.1993.5600?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nelson, Richard R & Wright, Gavin, 1992. "The Rise and Fall of American Technological Leadership: The Postwar Era in Historical Perspective," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 30(4), pages 1931-1964, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Karen Clay & Werner Troesken & Michael Haines, 2014. "Lead and Mortality," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 96(3), pages 458-470, July.
    2. Can Huang & Naubahar Sharif, 2016. "Global technology leadership: The case of China," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 43(1), pages 62-73.
    3. Ponomariov, Branco & Toivanen, Hannes, 2014. "Knowledge flows and bases in emerging economy innovation systems: Brazilian research 2005–2009," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 588-596.
    4. Christoph Meister & Bart Verspagen & Guntram B. Wolff, 2006. "European Productivity Gaps: Is R&D the Solution?," Chapters, in: Susanne Mundschenk & Michael H. Stierle & Ulrike Stierle-von Schütz & Iulia Traistaru-Siedschlag (ed.), Competitiveness and Growth in Europe, chapter 8, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. Crafts, Nicholas & Toniolo, Gianni, 2008. "European Economic Growth, 1950-2005: An Overview," CEPR Discussion Papers 6863, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    6. McLean, Ian W., 2007. "Why was Australia so rich?," Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 44(4), pages 635-656, October.
    7. Iancu, Aurel, 2009. "Real Economic Convergence," Working Papers of National Institute for Economic Research 090104, Institutul National de Cercetari Economice (INCE).
    8. Nien-Huei Jiang, 2000. "Information Spillover and Economic Development," Vanderbilt University Department of Economics Working Papers 0030, Vanderbilt University Department of Economics.
    9. Filippetti, Andrea & Vezzani, Antonio, 2022. "The political economy of public research, or why some governments commit to research more than others," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    10. Fedderke, J.W. & Bogetic, Z., 2009. "Infrastructure and Growth in South Africa: Direct and Indirect Productivity Impacts of 19 Infrastructure Measures," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 37(9), pages 1522-1539, September.
    11. Lorenzo Caprio & Silvia Rigamonti & Andrea Signori, 2020. "Legal origin, financial development, and innovation: evidence from large public and private firms in the U.S. and Europe," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 24(4), pages 905-925, December.
    12. Bruce A. Weinberg, 2009. "An Assessment of British Science over the Twentieth Century," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 119(538), pages 252-269, June.
    13. Jan Fagerberg & Martin Srholec, 2005. "Catching up: What are the Critical Factors for success?," Working Papers on Innovation Studies 20050401, Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture, University of Oslo.
    14. Howes, C. & Singh, A., 1999. "National Competitiveness, Dynamics of Adjustment and Long-term Economic Growth: Conceptual, Empirical and Policy Issues," Accounting and Finance Discussion Papers 00-af43, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    15. Pedro Castellón Patiño, 2018. "José Agustín Blanco Barros (1922 - 2016) : Un Provinciano Universal," European Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 3, ejms_v3_i.
    16. Antonin Bergeaud & Gilbert Cette & Rémy Lecat, 2016. "Productivity Trends in Advanced Countries between 1890 and 2012," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 62(3), pages 420-444, September.
    17. J Benson Durham, "undated". "A Survey of the Econometric Literature on the Real Effects of International Capital Flows in Lower Income Countries," QEH Working Papers qehwps50, Queen Elizabeth House, University of Oxford.
    18. van Schaik, A.B.T.M. & van de Klundert, T.C.M.J., 2010. "Productivity Growth and the Labor Market," Other publications TiSEM 6eb6d2c5-95a7-44e9-9cd4-6, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    19. Crafts, Nicholas, 2020. "British Relative Economic Decline in the Aftermath of German Unification," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 1295, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
    20. Godin, Benoit, 2004. "The New Economy: what the concept owes to the OECD," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 679-690, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:ecoprv:ecop_0249-4744_1993_num_107_1_5600. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/ecop .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.