IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prg/jnlpol/v2011y2011i5id814p680-705.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Monetární nerovnováha v teorii endogenních peněz
[Monetary Disequilibrium in the Theory of Endogenous Money]

Author

Listed:
  • Jan Korda

Abstract

The article deals with monetary disequilibrium in the theory of endogenous money. In new consensus economics, monetary disequilibrium is not considered whereas money is endogenous and passive. In post-Keynesian economics, there is an explicit discussion about reconciliation of money demand and supply. Based on careful distinction between money and credit markets, it is argued that monetary disequilibrium can occur even when money is endogenous and therefore money is endogenous and active. This is because of insufficiency of reflux mechanism. The article suggests ways in which new consensus should be supplemented to incorporate this issue. This is also important for monetary policy otherwise a part of transmission mechanism is left out.

Suggested Citation

  • Jan Korda, 2011. "Monetární nerovnováha v teorii endogenních peněz [Monetary Disequilibrium in the Theory of Endogenous Money]," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2011(5), pages 680-705.
    • Handle: RePEc:prg:jnlpol:v:2011:y:2011:i:5:id:814:p:680-705
    DOI: 10.18267/j.polek.814
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://polek.vse.cz/doi/10.18267/j.polek.814.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://polek.vse.cz/doi/10.18267/j.polek.814.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.18267/j.polek.814?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mark Gertler & Jordi Gali & Richard Clarida, 1999. "The Science of Monetary Policy: A New Keynesian Perspective," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 37(4), pages 1661-1707, December.
    2. Ben S. Bernanke & Mark Gertler, 1995. "Inside the Black Box: The Credit Channel of Monetary Policy Transmission," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 9(4), pages 27-48, Fall.
    3. Marc Lavoie, 2006. "A Post‐Keynesian Amendment To The New Consensus On Monetary Policy," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(2), pages 165-192, May.
    4. David Laidler, 1999. "Passive Money, Active Money, and Monetary Policy," Bank of Canada Review, Bank of Canada, vol. 1999(Summer), pages 15-25.
    5. Mark Setterfield (ed.), 2006. "Complexity, Endogenous Money and Macroeconomic Theory," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 3552.
    6. Basil J. Moore, 1997. "Reconciliation of the Supply and Demand for Endogenous Money," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(3), pages 423-428, March.
    7. Mark Setterfield, 2006. "Is inflation targeting compatible with Post Keynesian economics?," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(4), pages 653-671.
    8. Basil J. Moore, 1989. "A Simple Model of Bank Intermediation," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 10-28, September.
    9. William J. Barber (ed.), 1991. "Perspectives on the History of Economic Thought," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 713.
    10. Mark Gertler & Jordi Gali & Richard Clarida, 1999. "The Science of Monetary Policy: A New Keynesian Perspective," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 37(4), pages 1661-1707, December.
    11. Giuseppe Fontana & Alfonso Palacio-Vera, 2003. "Is There an Active Role for Monetary Policy in the Endogenous Money Approach?," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(2), pages 511-517, June.
    12. Laidler, David, 1984. "The 'Buffer Stock' Notion in Monetary Economics," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 94(376a), pages 17-34, Supplemen.
    13. Philip Arestis & Malcolm Sawyer, 2003. "Does the stock of money have any causal significance?," Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro, vol. 56(225), pages 113-136.
    14. Bennett T. McCallum, 2001. "Monetary policy analysis in models without money," Review, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, vol. 83(Jul), pages 145-164.
    15. Victoria Chick & Sheila Dow, 2002. "Monetary Policy with Endogenous Money and Liquidity Preference: A Nondualistic Treatment," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(4), pages 587-607, July.
    16. Cottrell, Allin, 1994. "Post-Keynesian Monetary Economics," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 18(6), pages 587-605, December.
    17. C. A. E. Goodhart, 1991. "Is the concept of an Equilibrium Demand for Money Meaningful? A Reply to “Has the Demand for Money been Mislaid?”," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(1), pages 134-136, September.
    18. David H. Romer, 2000. "Keynesian Macroeconomics without the LM Curve," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 14(2), pages 149-169, Spring.
    19. Hewitson, Gillian, 1997. "The Post-Keynesian 'Demand for Credit' Model," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(68), pages 127-143, June.
    20. William J. Barber (ed.), 1991. "Perspectives on the History of Economic Thought," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 31.
    21. Basil John Moore, 2006. "Shaking the Invisible Hand," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-0-230-51213-9, December.
    22. Marc Lavoie, 2009. "Taming the New Consensus: Hysteresis and Some Other Post Keynesian Amendments," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Giuseppe Fontana & Mark Setterfield (ed.), Macroeconomic Theory and Macroeconomic Pedagogy, chapter 10, pages 191-213, Palgrave Macmillan.
    23. Arestis, Philip & Howells, Peter, 1999. "The Supply of Credit Money and the Demand for Deposits: A Reply," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 23(1), pages 115-119, January.
    24. Laurence H. Meyer, 2001. "Does money matter?," Review, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, vol. 83(May), pages 1-16.
    25. Basil J. Moore, 1991. "Has the Demand for Money Been Mislaid? A Reply to “Has Moore become Too Horizontal?”," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(1), pages 125-133, September.
    26. Arestis, Philip & Howells, Peter, 1996. "Theoretical Reflections on Endogenous Money: The Problem with 'Convenience Lending.'," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 20(5), pages 539-551, September.
    27. Rabin, Alan A, 1993. "Clarification of the Excess Demand for or Excess Supply of Money," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 31(3), pages 448-455, July.
    28. Peter G.A. Howells, 1997. "The Demand for Endogenous Money: A Rejoinder," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(3), pages 429-435, March.
    29. Peter Howells, 2009. "The Money Supply in Macroeconomics," Working Papers 0904, Department of Accounting, Economics and Finance, Bristol Business School, University of the West of England, Bristol.
    30. Peter G.A. Howells, 1995. "The Demand for Endogenous Money," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 89-106, September.
    31. Giuseppe Fontana & Mark Setterfield (ed.), 2009. "Macroeconomic Theory and Macroeconomic Pedagogy," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-0-230-29166-9, December.
    32. Lavoie, Marc, 1999. "The Credit-Led Supply of Deposits and the Demand for Money: Kaldor's Reflux Mechanism as Previously Endorsed by Joan Robinson," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 23(1), pages 103-113, January.
    33. Charles Goodhart, 1989. "Has Moore Become Too Horizontal?," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 29-34, September.
    34. Thomas I. Palley, 1991. "The Endogenous Money Supply: Consensus and Disagreement," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(3), pages 397-403, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aleš Krejdl, 2003. "Alternativní postkeynesovské modely determinace peněžní zásoby [Alternative post-keynesian models of money supply determination]," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2003(2), pages 263-285.
    2. Jan Korda, 2010. "Komparace nového konsensu jako teoretického rámce cílování inflace s postkeynesovskou ekonomií [A Comparison of New Consensus as a Theoretical Framework of Inflation Targeting with Post-Keynesian E," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2010(1), pages 92-104.
    3. Philip Arestis & Malcolm Sawyer, 2003. "Does the stock of money have any causal significance?," Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro, vol. 56(225), pages 113-136.
    4. Kevin S. Nell, 2000. "The Endogenous/Exogenous Nature of South Africa’s Money Supply Under Direct and Indirect Monetary Control Measures," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(2), pages 313-329, December.
    5. Giuseppe Fontana, 2004. "Rethinking Endogenous Money: A Constructive Interpretation Of The Debate Between Horizontalists And Structuralists," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(4), pages 367-385, November.
    6. Eckhard Hein & Christian Schoder, 2011. "Interest rates, distribution and capital accumulation -- A post-Kaleckian perspective on the US and Germany," International Review of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(6), pages 693-723, November.
    7. Marc Lavoie, 2001. "Endogenous Money in a Coherent Stock-Flow Framework," Macroeconomics 0103007, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Giuseppe Fontana & Ezio Venturino, 2003. "Endogenous Money: An Analytical Approach," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 50(4), pages 398-416, September.
    9. Giancarlo Bertocco, 2005. "The Role of credit in a Keynesian monetary economy," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(4), pages 489-511.
    10. Giuseppe Fontana & Alfonso Palacio‐Vera, 2007. "Are Long‐Run Price Stability And Short‐Run Output Stabilization All That Monetary Policy Can Aim For?," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(2), pages 269-298, May.
    11. Mark Setterfield & Kurt von Seekamm, 2012. "Stabilization Policy with an Endogenous Commercial Bank," Chapters, in: Louis-Philippe Rochon & Salewa ‘Yinka Olawoye (ed.), Monetary Policy and Central Banking, chapter 2, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    12. Eckhard Hein & Engelbert Stockhammer, 2010. "Macroeconomic Policy Mix, Employment and Inflation in a Post-Keynesian Alternative to the New Consensus Model," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(3), pages 317-354.
    13. Duccio Cavalieri, 2004. "On Some Equilibrium and Disequilibrium Theories of Endogenous Money: A Structuralist View," History of Economic Ideas, Fabrizio Serra Editore, Pisa - Roma, vol. 12(3), pages 51-83.
    14. Michaelides, Panayotis G. & Milios, John G. & Konstantakis, Konstantinos N. & Tarnaras, Panayiotis, 2015. "Quantity-of-money fluctuations and economic instability: empirical evidence for the USA (1958–2006)," MPRA Paper 90145, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. M. Lopreite, 2012. "The endogenous money hypothesis and securitization: the Euro area case (1999-2010)," Economics Department Working Papers 2012-EP02, Department of Economics, Parma University (Italy).
    16. Hasan Cömert, 2012. "Decoupling between the Federal Funds Rate and Long-term Interest Rates: Decreasing Effectiveness of Monetary Policy in the U.S," Working Papers wp295, Political Economy Research Institute, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
    17. Philip Arestis & Malcolm Sawyer, 2002. "Can Monetary Policy Affect The Real Economy?," Macroeconomics 0209012, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Thomas I. Palley, 2013. "Horizontalists, verticalists, and structuralists: the theory of endogenous money reassessed," Review of Keynesian Economics, Edward Elgar Publishing, vol. 1(4), pages 406—424-4, OCT.
    19. Philip Arestis & Malcolm Sawyer, 2005. "Reinventing Fiscal Policy," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Blandine Laperche & Dimitri Uzunidis (ed.), John Kenneth Galbraith and the Future of Economics, chapter 9, pages 105-125, Palgrave Macmillan.
    20. Elaine Cristina de Piza & Joilson Dias, 2006. "Novo Consenso Macroeconômico E Política Monetária No Brasil: Uma Avaliação Empírica," Anais do XXXIV Encontro Nacional de Economia [Proceedings of the 34th Brazilian Economics Meeting] 164, ANPEC - Associação Nacional dos Centros de Pós-Graduação em Economia [Brazilian Association of Graduate Programs in Economics].

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Post-Keynesian economics; endogenous money; monetary disequilibrium; new consensus economics; reflux mechanism;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • E31 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles - - - Price Level; Inflation; Deflation
    • E41 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Money and Interest Rates - - - Demand for Money
    • E51 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit - - - Money Supply; Credit; Money Multipliers
    • E52 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit - - - Monetary Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prg:jnlpol:v:2011:y:2011:i:5:id:814:p:680-705. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stanislav Vojir (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/uevsecz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.