IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prg/jnlpep/v2009y2009i4id357p327-341.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing the Validity of the Brown-Potoski Model in the Czech and Slovak Republics

Author

Listed:
  • Jan Pavel
  • Emilia Sičáková-Beblavá

Abstract

This paper is based on the new institutional economic approach, which focuses on analysis between services features (asset specificity, outcome measurability) and their eligibility to contract out. This issue, which de facto constitutes one of the subsets of the ""make or buy decision"" issue, is also analysed by the so-called Brown-Potoski model. It analyses the relations between selected features of a demanded service and its suitability or unsuitability for outsourcing, whilst making use of information about transaction costs economy. Using data from 100 Czech municipalities and 100 Slovak municipalities, the viability of the Brown-Potoski model is tested. The results of the research show that a connection was identified between the measurability of the required service and its suitability for external provision, but the relationship between the specificity of investments and the suitability for external provision was not. The reason is probably the previous financial demands of the initial investment, which is, above all in the case of small municipalities, beyond their budgetary means.

Suggested Citation

  • Jan Pavel & Emilia Sičáková-Beblavá, 2009. "Testing the Validity of the Brown-Potoski Model in the Czech and Slovak Republics," Prague Economic Papers, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2009(4), pages 327-341.
    • Handle: RePEc:prg:jnlpep:v:2009:y:2009:i:4:id:357:p:327-341
    DOI: 10.18267/j.pep.357
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://pep.vse.cz/doi/10.18267/j.pep.357.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://pep.vse.cz/doi/10.18267/j.pep.357.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.18267/j.pep.357?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jens Lundsgaard, 2003. "Competition and Efficiency in Publicly Funded Services," OECD Economic Studies, OECD Publishing, vol. 2002(2), pages 79-128.
    2. Miroslav Beblavý, 2002. "Understanding the waves of agencification and the governance problems they have raised in Central and Eastern European Countries," OECD Journal on Budgeting, OECD Publishing, vol. 2(1), pages 121-139.
    3. Emília Sičáková-Beblavá & Miroslav Beblavý, 2007. "Faktory ovplyvňujúce rozhodovanie o spôsobe zabezpečovania služieb vo veľkých slovenských mestách [Factors Influencing Decisions on Services Provision in major Slovak Cities]," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2007(2), pages 245-262.
    4. Simon Domberger & Stephen Rimmer, 1994. "Competitive Tendering and Contracting in the Public Sector: A Survey," International Journal of the Economics of Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(3), pages 439-453.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Šumpíková Markéta & Ďurčeková Ina, 2019. "Transaction Costs, Outsourcing, and the Public Procurement Review Process in the Czech Republic and Slovakia," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 12(2), pages 233-250, December.
    2. Jan Pavel, 2018. "Soukromé transakční náklady zadávání veřejných zakázek a faktory ovlivňující jejich výši [Private Transaction Costs of Procurement and Factors Affecting Their Value]," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2018(1), pages 20-34.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Germa Bel & Anton Costas, 2006. "Do Public Sector Reforms Get Rusty? Local Privatization in Spain," Journal of Economic Policy Reform, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 1-24.
    2. Marius Constantin PROFIROIU & Septimiu Rares SZABO, 2016. "Outsourcing vs decentralisation: A comparative analysis in Central and Eastern Europe," Eco-Economics Review, Ecological University of Bucharest, Economics Faculty and Ecology and Environmental Protection Faculty, vol. 2(2), pages 3-26, December.
    3. K. A. Houghton & C. Dolley & C. A. Jubb & K. M. Chong, 2002. "Jurisdictional Differences in Contracting Out GBE Audits: The Impact on Audit Pricing," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 12(28), pages 50-57, November.
    4. Amaral, Miguel & Saussier, Stéphane & Yvrande-Billon, Anne, 2009. "Auction procedures and competition in public services: The case of urban public transport in France and London," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 166-175, June.
    5. Ola MATTISSON & Anna THOMASSON, 2007. "The Strategic Process And Its Impact On The Outcome Of A Tender," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 78(3), pages 439-454, September.
    6. Nick Manning & Geoffrey Shepherd, 2009. "Arms Length Bodies," World Bank Publications - Reports 10521, The World Bank Group.
    7. Robin G. Milne & Robert E. Wright, 2004. "Competition and Costs: Evidence from Competitive Tendering in the Scottish National Health Service," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Scottish Economic Society, vol. 51(1), pages 1-23, February.
    8. Andreas Bergh, 2014. "Sweden and the Revival of the Capitalist Welfare State," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 15717.
    9. Germà Bel & Xavier Fageda, 2009. "Factors explaining local privatization: a meta-regression analysis," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 139(1), pages 105-119, April.
    10. Elke J. Jahn & Wolfgang Ochel, 2005. "Contracting Out Temporary Help Services in Germany," CESifo Working Paper Series 1580, CESifo.
    11. Alonso, José M. & Clifton, Judith & Díaz-Fuentes, Daniel, 2017. "The impact of government outsourcing on public spending: Evidence from European Union countries," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 333-348.
    12. Luis Angeles & Robin G. Milne‌, 2015. "Tracking cost savings from competitive tendering in the short and long run," Working Papers 2015_11, Business School - Economics, University of Glasgow.
    13. Martínez, Ricardo & Sánchez-Soriano, Joaquín & Llorca, Natividad, 2022. "Assessments in public procurement procedures," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    14. Robin G. Milne, 1997. "Market-type Mechanisms, Market Testing and Market Making: A Longitudinal Study of Contractor Interest in Tendering," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 34(4), pages 543-559, April.
    15. Germà Bel & Marianna Sebo, 2020. "Introducing and enhancing competition to improve solid waste management in Barcelona," IREA Working Papers 202004, University of Barcelona, Research Institute of Applied Economics, revised Apr 2020.
    16. Gyldas A. Ofoulhast‐Othamot, 2022. "The perils of a bureaucratic fad in Africa: Examining the effects of the agencification of the state apparatus in Gabon," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 42(3), pages 179-189, August.
    17. Dorigoni, Susanna & Portatadino, Sergio, 2009. "Natural gas distribution in Italy: When competition does not help the market," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 17(3-4), pages 245-257, September.
    18. Jeffrey Keefe, 2012. "Public Employee Compensation and the Efficacy of Privatization Alternatives in US State and Local Governments," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 50(4), pages 782-809, December.
    19. Patrick Mabuza, 2019. "Is the Public Private Partnership Model the Right Vehicle for Public Infrastructure Delivery in Developing Countries?," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 11(1), pages 211-222.
    20. Wolfgang Ochel, 2004. "Competitive Tendering and Contracting of Temporary Work Agencies in Germany," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 2(2), pages 69-74, 07.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Czech Republic; Brown-Potoski model; public services; Slovak Republic; transaction costs;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D23 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Organizational Behavior; Transaction Costs; Property Rights
    • H42 - Public Economics - - Publicly Provided Goods - - - Publicly Provided Private Goods
    • H72 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - State and Local Budget and Expenditures

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prg:jnlpep:v:2009:y:2009:i:4:id:357:p:327-341. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stanislav Vojir (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/uevsecz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.