IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prg/jnlcbr/v2013y2013i2id44p31-44.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimum Resource Allocation and Eliminating Waste Inside the Food Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Chandru Nagarajan Sathiyabama
  • Pramod Dasan

Abstract

This article seeks to allocate optimum resources for the wrapping section and suggesting a suitable method that needs to be in place for successful elimination of waste inside the food industry's wrapping section. It also includes identifying the main reasons for various types of wastages inside the wrapping section and cost of all the wastages. The paper is based on observation and research using the approach of lean tools and techniques. The methodology used for evaluating data is value stream mapping and some statistical SPSS tools for analysis. Data are real and are gathered from three different production shifts inside a food industry wrapping section. The main reasons for wastages inside the wrapping section are highlighted. Finally, the paper was concluded by estimating total cost of wastages and recommending a suitable way to save wastage costs. The need to change the jaws inside the wrapping machines, regular maintenance of all machines throughout the industry and training of personnel are recommended. The possible methods along with their benefits to reduce waste, operators, improve productivity and business growth were also highlighted.

Suggested Citation

  • Chandru Nagarajan Sathiyabama & Pramod Dasan, 2013. "Optimum Resource Allocation and Eliminating Waste Inside the Food Industry," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2013(2), pages 31-44.
    • Handle: RePEc:prg:jnlcbr:v:2013:y:2013:i:2:id:44:p:31-44
    DOI: 10.18267/j.cebr.44
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://cebr.vse.cz/doi/10.18267/j.cebr.44.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://cebr.vse.cz/doi/10.18267/j.cebr.44.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.18267/j.cebr.44?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mark Young, S. & Shields, Michael D. & Wolf, Gerrit, 1988. "Manufacturing controls and performance: An experiment," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 13(6), pages 607-618, October.
    2. Kao, Chiang & Chen, Liang-Hsuan & Wang, Tai-Yue & Kuo, Shyanjaw & Horng, Shi-Dai, 1995. "Productivity improvement: Efficiency approach vs effectiveness approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 197-204, April.
    3. Angra, Surjit & Sehgal, Rakesh & Samsudeen Noori, Z., 2008. "Cellular manufacturing--A time-based analysis to the layout problem," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(1), pages 427-438, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohd Fahmi Bin Mad Ali & Mohd Khairol Anuar Bin Mohd Ariffin & Faizal Bin Mustapha & Eris Elianddy Bin Supeni, 2021. "An Unsupervised Machine Learning-Based Framework for Transferring Local Factories into Supply Chain Networks," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(23), pages 1-31, December.
    2. Koufteros, Xenophon & Lu, Guanyi & Peters, Richard C. & Lai, Kee-hung & Wong, Christina W.Y. & Edwin Cheng, T.C., 2014. "Product development practices, manufacturing practices, and performance: A mediational perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 83-97.
    3. Podinovski, V. V., 2004. "Suitability and redundancy of non-homogeneous weight restrictions for measuring the relative efficiency in DEA," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(2), pages 380-395, April.
    4. A. Attila İşlier, 2015. "Cellular Manufacturing Systems: Organization, Trends and Innovative Methods," Alphanumeric Journal, Bahadir Fatih Yildirim, vol. 3(2), pages 13-26, December.
    5. Luft, Joan & Shields, Michael D., 2003. "Mapping management accounting: graphics and guidelines for theory-consistent empirical research," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(2-3), pages 169-249.
    6. Hameri, Ari-Pekka, 2011. "Production flow analysis--Cases from manufacturing and service industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(2), pages 233-241, February.
    7. Christian Hofmann & Erik Hofmann & Thomas Pfeiffer, 2008. "Kontrollrechte und Anreize in Supply Chains," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 60(59), pages 1-29, January.
    8. Fullerton, Rosemary R. & McWatters, Cheryl S., 2002. "The role of performance measures and incentive systems in relation to the degree of JIT implementation," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 27(8), pages 711-735, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    LEAN Methodology; Optimization in Food Logistics; Operations in Food lndustry;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C40 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics - - - General
    • C41 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics - - - Duration Analysis; Optimal Timing Strategies
    • C44 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics - - - Operations Research; Statistical Decision Theory
    • C81 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - Methodology for Collecting, Estimating, and Organizing Microeconomic Data; Data Access

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prg:jnlcbr:v:2013:y:2013:i:2:id:44:p:31-44. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stanislav Vojir (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/uevsecz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.