IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pop/journl/v7y2023i2p85-96.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Making of Smart Citizenry Decoding Smart Citizen

Author

Listed:
  • Deepak KUMAR

    (Asian Development Research Institute, Patna)

Abstract

Ayona Datta (2017) highlights how the digital turn in the post-colonial cities in India has allowed the coercive power of state to control and discipline citizenry by making them actively engage in governance; while the active citizenry is just a smokescreen, a proxy to provide the larger legitimacy to the smart city project and rather the citizenry is paternalised and handheld through the emerging technologies of government. She argues, in the process, the emergence of alternative citizenry is cast and their reflections need to be gauged from the perspective of subaltern and others who defy the digital turn and its wider network. In this backdrop, the article examines the discursive construction of smart citizenry under India s Smart Cities Mission. Drawing on the discourse analysis of 100 smart city proposals, the article contends that the Mission creates a false binary of active and passive citizenship with implications on the citizenship rights. It is further argued that that the Mission has a very narrow understanding of active citizenship, limited to just giving tacit consent to smart city projects. This is depicted in proposals calling for smart, active, duty-bearing, responsible citizenry lack of which risk jeopardize the success of smart cities.

Suggested Citation

  • Deepak KUMAR, 2023. "The Making of Smart Citizenry Decoding Smart Citizen," Smart Cities and Regional Development (SCRD) Journal, Smart-EDU Hub, Faculty of Public Administration, National University of Political Studies & Public Administration, vol. 7(2), pages 85-96, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:pop:journl:v:7:y:2023:i:2:p:85-96
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://scrd.eu/index.php/scrd/article/view/403/368
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://scrd.eu/index.php/scrd/article/view/403
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Taylor Shelton & Thomas Lodato, 2019. "Actually existing smart citizens," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(1), pages 35-52, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dietmar Offenhuber, 2019. "The platform and the bricoleur—Improvisation and smart city initiatives in Indonesia," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 46(8), pages 1565-1580, October.
    2. Ozge CELIK YILMAZ & Ozhan ERTEKIN, 2023. "Urban Living Labs As A Tool To Achieve Sustainable Development Goal 16: A Case Study Of Istanbul, Turkiye," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 18(3), pages 88-118, August.
    3. Paolo Cardullo & Rob Kitchin, 2019. "Smart urbanism and smart citizenship: The neoliberal logic of ‘citizen-focused’ smart cities in Europe," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 37(5), pages 813-830, August.
    4. Jooseok Oh & Minho Seo, 2021. "Measuring Citizens-Centric Smart City: Development and Validation of Ex-Post Evaluation Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-22, October.
    5. Butot, Vivien & Bayerl, Petra Saskia & Jacobs, Gabriele & de Haan, Freek, 2020. "Citizen repertoires of smart urban safety: Perspectives from Rotterdam, the Netherlands," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    6. Frederike Marie Oschinsky & Hans Christian Klein & Bjoern Niehaves, 2022. "Invite everyone to the table, but not to every course," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(4), pages 1925-1941, December.
    7. Ryan Burns & Max Andrucki, 2021. "Smart cities: Who cares?," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(1), pages 12-30, February.
    8. Bernd W. Wirtz & Marcel Becker & Florian W. Schmidt, 2022. "Smart city services: an empirical analysis of citizen preferences," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 1063-1080, December.
    9. Brian Fabrègue & Léo J. Portal & Christopher Cockshaw, 2023. "Using smart people to build smarter: How smart cities attract and retain highly skilled workers to drive innovation (Belgium, Denmark, the Netherlands, Poland)," Smart Cities and Regional Development (SCRD) Journal, Smart-EDU Hub, Faculty of Public Administration, National University of Political Studies & Public Administration, vol. 7(1), pages 9-30, March.
    10. Fenna Imara Hoefsloot & Javier Martínez & Christine Richter & Karin Pfeffer, 2020. "Expert-Amateurs and Smart Citizens: How Digitalization Reconfigures Lima’s Water Infrastructure," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(4), pages 312-323.
    11. Joachim Åström, 2020. "Participatory Urban Planning: What Would Make Planners Trust the Citizens?," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(2), pages 84-93.
    12. Dashkevych, Oleg & Portnov, Boris A., 2023. "Human-centric, sustainability-driven approach to ranking smart cities worldwide," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    13. Fenna Imara Hoefsloot & Javier Martínez & Christine Richter & Karin Pfeffer, 2020. "Expert-Amateurs and Smart Citizens: How Digitalization Reconfigures Lima’s Water Infrastructure," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(4), pages 312-323.
    14. Katharina Lange & Jörg Knieling, 2020. "EU Smart City Lighthouse Projects between Top-Down Strategies and Local Legitimation: The Case of Hamburg," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(1), pages 107-115.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    smart citizen; smart cities; smart cities mission; citizenship rights;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O35 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Social Innovation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pop:journl:v:7:y:2023:i:2:p:85-96. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Professor Catalin Vrabie (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fasnsro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.