IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pop/journl/v7y2023i2p25-38.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The economic and social impacts of smart cities multi stakeholder pre study results

Author

Listed:
  • Karina RADCHENKO

    (Institute of Industrial Economy, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine)

Abstract

Smart cities are getting increasingly popular and being seen as one answer to several challenges. The smart city framework is seen as a popular answer to numerous challenges. There is no common definition of a smart city and the theoretical understanding is framed in multiple ways in practice. To better understand the phenomenon of smart cities it is important to see how it is viewed in practice by different stakeholders. Objectives This paper contributes to collecting and analyzing the stakeholders visions to develop the definition of smart cities and classify their social and economic effects as a basis for further advanced study in this direction. Prior work The previous findings have determined the double-sided effects of smart cities in social and economic domains that could be balanced through different tools. In terms of the fundamental importance of ensuring citizen-oriented and sustainable utilization of smart city as a tool purporting to improve quality of life, it is needed to critically assess how stakeholders perceive these impacts and what tools could be applied to prevent negative outcomes. Methodology The paper applies a literature review, in-depth interviews with the smart city experts and survey answers analysis involving the city stakeholders including local and regional authorities and the real citizens to determine the personalized visions of smart city definition and impacts as well as open source analysis. Results Based on the data collected, the classification of the social and economic impacts of smart cities is proposed as well as study-based definition of smart city is provided. It is argued that considering social and economic impacts of smart cities needs further attention in terms of the multi-stakeholder perspective and continuation of the work started in this paper. In doing so, the paper does not only contribute to the theoretical comprehension of smart city but provides the basis for further strategy development to maximize social and economic positives of its application while minimizing the negatives.

Suggested Citation

  • Karina RADCHENKO, 2023. "The economic and social impacts of smart cities multi stakeholder pre study results," Smart Cities and Regional Development (SCRD) Journal, Smart-EDU Hub, Faculty of Public Administration, National University of Political Studies & Public Administration, vol. 7(2), pages 25-38, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:pop:journl:v:7:y:2023:i:2:p:25-38
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://scrd.eu/index.php/scrd/article/view/397/362
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://scrd.eu/index.php/scrd/article/view/397
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Trencher, Gregory, 2019. "Towards the smart city 2.0: Empirical evidence of using smartness as a tool for tackling social challenges," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 117-128.
    2. François Mancebo, 2020. "Smart city strategies: time to involve people. Comparing Amsterdam, Barcelona and Paris," Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2), pages 133-152, April.
    3. Karina RADCHENKO, 2022. "The perspectives of sustainable territorial development in smart cities," Smart Cities and Regional Development (SCRD) Journal, Smart-EDU Hub, Faculty of Public Administration, National University of Political Studies & Public Administration, vol. 6(3), pages 59-72, June.
    4. Nagender Kumar Suryadevara & Gyan Ranjan Biswal, 2019. "Smart Plugs: Paradigms and Applications in the Smart City-and-Smart Grid," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-20, May.
    5. Fan-Yun Pai & Tsu-Ming Yeh, 2014. "The effects of information sharing and interactivity on the intention to use social networking websites," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 48(4), pages 2191-2207, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mora, Luca & Gerli, Paolo & Ardito, Lorenzo & Messeni Petruzzelli, Antonio, 2023. "Smart city governance from an innovation management perspective: Theoretical framing, review of current practices, and future research agenda," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    2. Deli Yuan & Muhammad Khalilur Rahman & Md. Abu Issa Gazi & Md. Atikur Rahaman & Mohammad Mainul Hossain & Shaharin Akter, 2021. "Analyzing of User Attitudes Toward Intention to Use Social Media for Learning," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, November.
    3. Nikitaeva Anastasia (Никитаева А.Ю.), 2021. "Retrospective And Perspective Of The Development Of E-Government In The Digital Economy [Ретроспектива И Перспектива Развития Электронного Правительства В Цифровой Экономике]," State and Municipal Management Scholar Notes, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 2, pages 56-62.
    4. Yáñez-Valdés, Claudia & Guerrero, Maribel & Barros-Celume, Sebastián & Ibáñez, María J., 2023. "Winds of change due to global lockdowns: Refreshing digital social entrepreneurship research paradigm," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    5. Gusti Ayu Made Suartika & Alexander Cuthbert, 2020. "The Sustainable Imperative—Smart Cities, Technology and Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-15, October.
    6. Kanning, Helga & Scholles, Frank & Mancebo, Francois, 2022. "The sustainable and participatory city: A challenging concept!," Forschungsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Gustedt, Evelyn & Grabski-Kieron, Ulrike & Demazière, Christophe & Paris, Didier (ed.), Cities and metropolises in France and Germany, volume 20, pages 145-161, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    7. Manuel Rey-Moreno & Rafael Periáñez-Cristóbal & Arturo Calvo-Mora, 2022. "Reflections on Sustainable Urban Mobility, Mobility as a Service (MaaS) and Adoption Models," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-14, December.
    8. Kummitha, Rama Krishna Reddy, 2020. "Why distance matters: The relatedness between technology development and its appropriation in smart cities," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    9. Luhua Li & Xiaohong Lin & Xiaoting Yang & Zhiwei Luo & Min Wang, 2024. "Digital Governance and Urban Government Service Spaces: Understanding Resident Interaction and Perception in Chinese Cities," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-22, August.
    10. Zhengrong Liu & Jianping Wu, 2023. "A Review of the Theory and Practice of Smart City Construction in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-22, April.
    11. Zhu, Yu-Qian & Alamsyah, Nurwahyu, 2022. "Citizen empowerment and satisfaction with smart city app: Findings from Jakarta," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    12. Qian Wang & Shixian Luo & Jiao Zhang & Katsunori Furuya, 2022. "Increased Attention to Smart Development in Rural Areas: A Scientometric Analysis of Smart Village Research," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-28, August.
    13. Nancy Micozzi & Tan Yigitcanlar, 2022. "Understanding Smart City Policy: Insights from the Strategy Documents of 52 Local Governments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-26, August.
    14. Zhang, Mengzhu & Zhao, Pengjun & Qiao, Si, 2020. "Smartness-induced transport inequality: Privacy concern, lacking knowledge of smartphone use and unequal access to transport information," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 175-185.
    15. Sorin-George Toma & Cătălin Grădinaru & Oana-Simona Hudea & Andra Modreanu, 2023. "Perceptions and Attitudes of Generation Z Students towards the Responsible Management of Smart Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-40, September.
    16. Jooseok Oh & Minho Seo, 2021. "Measuring Citizens-Centric Smart City: Development and Validation of Ex-Post Evaluation Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-22, October.
    17. Bhatti, Zeeshan Ahmed & Arain, Ghulam Ali & Akram, Muhammad Shakaib & Fang, Yu-Hui & Yasin, Hina Mahboob, 2020. "Constructive voice behavior for social change on social networking sites: A reflection of moral identity," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    18. Oleg Dashkevych & Boris A. Portnov, 2022. "Criteria for Smart City Identification: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-34, April.
    19. Ioannis Vardopoulos & Maria Papoui-Evangelou & Bogdana Nosova & Luca Salvati, 2023. "Smart ‘Tourist Cities’ Revisited: Culture-Led Urban Sustainability and the Global Real Estate Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-26, February.
    20. Artur Felipe da Silva Veloso & José Valdemir Reis Júnior & Ricardo de Andrade Lira Rabelo & Jocines Dela-flora Silveira, 2021. "HyDSMaaS: A Hybrid Communication Infrastructure with LoRaWAN and LoraMesh for the Demand Side Management as a Service," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-45, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    social and economic impacts; smart city; public administration; city stakeholders;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O35 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Social Innovation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pop:journl:v:7:y:2023:i:2:p:25-38. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Professor Catalin Vrabie (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fasnsro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.