IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0266126.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of hazard perception characteristics based on driving behavior considering overt and covert hazard scenarios

Author

Listed:
  • Tianzheng Wei
  • Tong Zhu
  • Chenxin Li
  • Haoxue Liu

Abstract

The drivers’ hazard perception plays an important role in preventing and reducing the occurrence of traffic accidents. In order to explore the drivers’ hazard perception and their behavioral characteristics in overt and covert hazards, hazardous events of three traffic conflict types (vehicle to vehicle, vehicle to cyclist and vehicle to pedestrian) were designed for overt and covert hazards based on the UC-win/Road driving simulation software, respectively. 35 drivers were organized to conduct the driving simulation tests. The data of driving behavior was collected when they were driving. A comparative analysis of drivers’ hazard perception ability and driving behavior characteristics was carried out for hazardous scenarios and traffic conflict types. The result has shown that drivers are more likely to take slowing measures or brake earlier in overt hazard scenarios to ensure safe driving. And drivers are more likely to be involved in collisions in covert hazard scenarios. The types of traffic conflict have a significant effect on the hazard perception ability of drivers (F = 5.92, p

Suggested Citation

  • Tianzheng Wei & Tong Zhu & Chenxin Li & Haoxue Liu, 2022. "Analysis of hazard perception characteristics based on driving behavior considering overt and covert hazard scenarios," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(4), pages 1-19, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0266126
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266126
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0266126
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0266126&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0266126?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mark S. Horswill & Shelby A. Marrington & Cynthia M. McCullough & Joanne Wood & Nancy A. Pachana & Jenna McWilliam & Maria K. Raikos, 2008. "The Hazard Perception Ability of Older Drivers," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 63(4), pages 212-218.
    2. Özlem Şimşekoğlu & Trond Nordfjærn & Torbjørn Rundmo, 2012. "Traffic risk perception, road safety attitudes, and behaviors among road users: a comparison of Turkey and Norway," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(7), pages 787-800, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chenwei Gu & Xingliang Liu & Nan Mao, 2024. "Driver Behavior Mechanisms and Conflict Risk Patterns in Tunnel-Interchange Connecting Sections: A Comprehensive Investigation Based on the Behavioral Adaptation Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-28, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Javadreza Vahedi & Afshin Shariat Mohaymany & Zahra Tabibi & Milad Mehdizadeh, 2018. "Aberrant Driving Behaviour, Risk Involvement, and Their Related Factors Among Taxi Drivers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-17, August.
    2. Karoline Gomes-Franco & Mario Rivera-Izquierdo & Luis Miguel Martín-delosReyes & Eladio Jiménez-Mejías & Virginia Martínez-Ruiz, 2020. "Explaining the Association between Driver’s Age and the Risk of Causing a Road Crash through Mediation Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-12, December.
    3. Daniela Knuth & Doris Kehl & Lynn Hulse & Silke Schmidt, 2014. "Risk Perception, Experience, and Objective Risk: A Cross‐National Study with European Emergency Survivors," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(7), pages 1286-1298, July.
    4. Gianluca Dell'Acqua & Francesca Russo & Salvatore Antonio Biancardo, 2013. "Risk-type density diagrams by crash type on two-lane rural roads," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(10), pages 1297-1314, November.
    5. Zain Ul-Abdin & Pieter De Winne & Hans De Backer, 2019. "Risk-Perception Formation Considering Tangible and Non-Tangible Aspects of Cycling: A Flemish Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-19, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0266126. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.