IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0254043.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

General self-efficacy in individuals with visual impairment compared with the general population

Author

Listed:
  • Audun Brunes
  • Marianne B Hansen
  • Trond Heir

Abstract

Background: Knowledge about self-efficacy and its significance for the quality of life of people with visual impairment is lacking. The aims of the study were to compare general self-efficacy in individuals with visual impairment with the general population, and to investigate the association between self-efficacy and life satisfaction. Methods: A telephone-based cross-sectional survey was conducted between January and May 2017 in a probability sample of adults who were members of the Norwegian Association of the Blind and Partially Sighted. Participants were asked questions about their sociodemographic characteristics, characteristics of vision loss, general self-efficacy (General Self-efficacy Scale), and life satisfaction (Cantril’s Ladder of Life Satisfaction). We obtained norm data from a representative survey of the general Norwegian population (N = 1792; mean age 53.2 years; 52.5% females). Results: People with visual impairment had higher levels of general self-efficacy than people in the general population (Mean: 31.5 versus 29.0, p

Suggested Citation

  • Audun Brunes & Marianne B Hansen & Trond Heir, 2021. "General self-efficacy in individuals with visual impairment compared with the general population," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(7), pages 1-12, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0254043
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254043
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0254043
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0254043&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0254043?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robyn Lewis Brown & Anne E. Barrett, 2011. "Visual Impairment and Quality of Life Among Older Adults: An Examination of Explanations for the Relationship," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 66(3), pages 364-373.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sergiu Burlacu & Davide Azzolini & Federico Podestà, 2024. "Beyond Sight: Exploring the Impact of a Multifaceted Intervention on Knowledge, Attitudes and Behaviors towards Persons with Visual Impairment," FBK-IRVAPP Working Papers 2024-03, Research Institute for the Evaluation of Public Policies (IRVAPP), Bruno Kessler Foundation.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stephanie K. Y. Chu & David T. C. To & Candice C. H. Liu & Tony Wong & Kenneth K. W. Li, 2022. "Psychological Impact of Cancellation of Elective Surgeries for Ophthalmic Patients during COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-7, November.
    2. Agnieszka Trawicka & Aleksandra Lewandowska-Walter & Mikołaj Majkowicz & Robert Sabiniewicz & Lidia Woźniak-Mielczarek, 2022. "Health-Related Quality of Life of Patients with Marfan Syndrome—Polish Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-12, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0254043. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.