Author
Listed:
- Hemn Unis Ahmed
- Ahmed Salih Mohammed
- Azad A Mohammed
- Rabar H Faraj
Abstract
Geopolymer concrete is an inorganic concrete that uses industrial or agro by-product ashes as the main binder instead of ordinary Portland cement; this leads to the geopolymer concrete being an eco-efficient and environmentally friendly construction material. A variety of ashes used as the binder in geopolymer concrete such as fly ash, ground granulated blast furnace slag, rice husk ash, metakaolin ash, and Palm oil fuel ash, fly ash was commonly consumed to prepare geopolymer concrete composites. The most important mechanical property for all types of concrete composites, including geopolymer concrete, is the compressive strength. However, in the structural design and construction field, the compressive strength of the concrete at 28 days is essential. Therefore, achieving an authoritative model for predicting the compressive strength of geopolymer concrete is necessary regarding saving time, energy, and cost-effectiveness. It gives guidance regarding scheduling the construction process and removal of formworks. In this study, Linear (LR), Non-Linear (NLR), and Multi-logistic (MLR) regression models were used to develop the predictive models for estimating the compressive strength of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete (FA-GPC). In this regard, a comprehensive dataset consists of 510 samples were collected in several academic research studies and analyzed to develop the models. In the modeling process, for the first time, twelve effective variable parameters on the compressive strength of the FA-GPC, including SiO2/Al2O3 (Si/Al) of fly ash binder, alkaline liquid to binder ratio (l/b), fly ash (FA) content, fine aggregate (F) content, coarse aggregate (C) content, sodium hydroxide (SH)content, sodium silicate (SS) content, (SS/SH), molarity (M), curing temperature (T), curing duration inside ovens (CD) and specimen ages (A) were considered as the modeling input parameters. Various statistical assessments such as Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Scatter Index (SI), OBJ value, and the Coefficient of determination (R2) were used to evaluate the efficiency of the developed models. The results indicated that the NLR model performed better for predicting the compressive strength of FA-GPC mixtures compared to the other models. Moreover, the sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the curing temperature, alkaline liquid to binder ratio, and sodium silicate content are the most affecting parameter for estimating the compressive strength of the FA-GPC.
Suggested Citation
Hemn Unis Ahmed & Ahmed Salih Mohammed & Azad A Mohammed & Rabar H Faraj, 2021.
"Systematic multiscale models to predict the compressive strength of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete at various mixture proportions and curing regimes,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(6), pages 1-26, June.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0253006
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253006
Download full text from publisher
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Kawan Ghafor & Hemn Unis Ahmed & Rabar H. Faraj & Ahmed Salih Mohammed & Rawaz Kurda & Warzer Sarwar Qadir & Wael Mahmood & Aso A. Abdalla, 2022.
"Computing Models to Predict the Compressive Strength of Engineered Cementitious Composites (ECC) at Various Mix Proportions,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-27, October.
- Dilshad Kakasor Ismael Jaf, 2023.
"Soft Computing and Machine Learning-Based Models to Predict the Slump and Compressive Strength of Self-Compacted Concrete Modified with Fly Ash,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-40, July.
- Hemn Unis Ahmed & Azad A. Mohammed & Serwan Rafiq & Ahmed S. Mohammed & Amir Mosavi & Nadhim Hamah Sor & Shaker M. A. Qaidi, 2021.
"Compressive Strength of Sustainable Geopolymer Concrete Composites: A State-of-the-Art Review,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-38, December.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0253006. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.