IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0251326.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk factors and protective factors of depression in older people 65+. A systematic review

Author

Listed:
  • Alexander Maier
  • Steffi G Riedel-Heller
  • Alexander Pabst
  • Melanie Luppa

Abstract

Objectives: Identifying risk factors of depression can provide a better understanding of the disorder in older people. However, to minimize bias due to the influence of confounders and to detect reverse influence, a focus on longitudinal studies using multivariate analysis is required. Design: A systematic literature search was conducted by searching the databases MEDLINE, Cochrane, PsycINFO and Web of Science for all relevant articles published from January 2000 to the end of March 2020. The following inclusion criteria were used: prospective design, nationally or regionally representative sample, published in English or German, analyzed risk factors for depression of individuals 65+ identified by multivariate analysis, and provided validity of diagnostic instrument. All results of multivariate analysis were reported and summarized. Results: Thirty articles were identified. Heterogeneous results were found for education, female gender, self-rated health, cognitive impairment and older age, although significant in several studies. Findings hinted at a protective quality of physical activity. In terms of physical health, chronic disease and difficulty initiating sleep homogeneously increased risk of depression. Mobility impairment resulted as a risk factor in three studies. IADL impairment and vision impairment were mostly identified as significant risk factors. Alcohol consumption and smoking behavior yielded heterogenous results. Psychosocial factors were assessed similarly in multiple studies and yielded heterogenous results. Limitations: Research was limited to articles published in English or German. Length of follow up was not considered for the presentation of results. Adjustments for and inclusion of different variables in the studies may distort results. Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate the necessity of refined, more comparable assessment tools for evaluating potential risk factors.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander Maier & Steffi G Riedel-Heller & Alexander Pabst & Melanie Luppa, 2021. "Risk factors and protective factors of depression in older people 65+. A systematic review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(5), pages 1-38, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0251326
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251326
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0251326
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0251326&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0251326?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gianluca Ciuffreda & Sara Cabanillas-Barea & Andoni Carrasco-Uribarren & María Isabel Albarova-Corral & María Irache Argüello-Espinosa & Yolanda Marcén-Román, 2021. "Factors Associated with Depression and Anxiety in Adults ≥60 Years Old during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-17, November.
    2. Janine Quittschalle & Alexander Pabst & Margrit Löbner & Melanie Luppa & Kathrin Heser & Michael Wagner & Hendrik van den Bussche & André Hajek & Hans-Helmut König & Birgitt Wiese & Matthias C. Angerm, 2021. "Association of Alcohol and Tobacco Consumption with Depression Severity in the Oldest Old. Results from the Age Different Old Age Cohort Platform," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-14, July.
    3. Heejung Choi & Jaelan Shim, 2022. "Predictors of Depression among Individuals Receiving the Basic Livelihood Security Program Benefits in Korea: A Study Based on the Sixth and Seventh Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Sur," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-11, December.
    4. Sandra Silva & Ana Bártolo & Isabel M. Santos & Anabela Pereira & Sara Monteiro, 2022. "Towards a Better Understanding of the Factors Associated with Distress in Elderly Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-19, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0251326. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.