IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0249311.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of agile management on project performance: Evidence from I.T sector of Pakistan

Author

Listed:
  • Umer Muhammad
  • Tahira Nazir
  • Najam Muhammad
  • Ahsen Maqsoom
  • Samina Nawab
  • Syeda Tamkeen Fatima
  • Khuram Shafi
  • Faisal Shafique Butt

Abstract

Over the past several years, global project management teams have been facing dynamic challenges that continue to grow exponentially with the increasing number of complexities associated with the undertaken tasks. The ever-evolving organizational challenges demand project managers to adapt novel management practices to accomplish organizational goals rather than following traditional management practices. Considering which, the current study aims to explain the effect of agile management practices upon project performance directly as well as while being mediated through project complexity. Furthermore, the aforementioned mediatory relationship is evaluated in terms of the moderating effect of leadership competencies. The current study utilized the survey approach to collect the data from registered I.T firms deployed in the potential metropolitans of each province of Pakistan including, Peshawar, Islamabad, Lahore, Sialkot, Faisalabad, Hyderabad, Sukkur, and Karachi. A total of 176 responses were utilized for statistical evaluations. As result, it was observed that the negative influence anticipated by project complexity on project performance was compensated by the agile management practices. Further, the leadership competencies played a pivotal role in managing project complexity while implementing agile management practices and therefore enhancing project performance. The current study abridges the potential knowledge gap conceptually by evaluating the direct impact of agile management upon project performance while considering all of its aspects, exploring the mediatory role of project performance and evaluating the moderating role of leadership competencies in attaining optimum project performance. In contextual terms, the current study fills the knowledge gap by gauging the implications of agile management practices within the I.T sector of Pakistan. The results of the current study can be a potential guide for both the academicians and the industry professionals.

Suggested Citation

  • Umer Muhammad & Tahira Nazir & Najam Muhammad & Ahsen Maqsoom & Samina Nawab & Syeda Tamkeen Fatima & Khuram Shafi & Faisal Shafique Butt, 2021. "Impact of agile management on project performance: Evidence from I.T sector of Pakistan," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(4), pages 1-24, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0249311
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249311
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0249311
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0249311&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0249311?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zainudin Awang & Asyraf Afthanorhan & Mustafa Mamat, 2016. "The Likert scale analysis using parametric based Structural Equation Modeling (SEM)," Computational Methods in Social Sciences (CMSS), "Nicolae Titulescu" University of Bucharest, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 4(1), pages 13-21, June.
    2. Siddhartha & Amit Sachan, 2016. "Review of agile supply chain implementation frameworks," International Journal of Business Performance and Supply Chain Modelling, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(1), pages 27-45.
    3. Bashaer Almatrooshi & Sanjay Kumar Singh & Sherine Farouk, 2016. "Determinants of organizational performance: a proposed framework," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 65(6), pages 844-859, July.
    4. Yusuf, Y. Y. & Sarhadi, M. & Gunasekaran, A., 1999. "Agile manufacturing:: The drivers, concepts and attributes," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(1-2), pages 33-43, May.
    5. Marco Aurélio de Oliveira & Luiz Veriano Oliveira Dalla Valentina & Osmar Possamai, 2012. "Forecasting project performance considering the influence of leadership style on organizational agility," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 61(6), pages 653-671, July.
    6. Sharifi, H. & Zhang, Z., 1999. "A methodology for achieving agility in manufacturing organisations: An introduction," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(1-2), pages 7-22, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peyman Mohammady & Amin Amid, 2011. "Integrated fuzzy AHP and fuzzy VIKOR model for supplier selection in an agile and modular virtual enterprise," Fuzzy Information and Engineering, Springer, vol. 3(4), pages 411-431, December.
    2. Anna-Theresa Walter, 2021. "Organizational agility: ill-defined and somewhat confusing? A systematic literature review and conceptualization," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 71(2), pages 343-391, April.
    3. Pinho, Celso R.A. & Pinho, Maria Luiza C.A. & Deligonul, Seyda Z. & Tamer Cavusgil, S., 2022. "The agility construct in the literature: Conceptualization and bibliometric assessment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 517-532.
    4. Lin, Ching-Torng & Chiu, Hero & Tseng, Yi-Hong, 2006. "Agility evaluation using fuzzy logic," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(2), pages 353-368, June.
    5. Wageeh A. Nafei, 2017. "Job Engagement as a Mediator of the Relationship between Organizational Agility and Organizational Performance: A Study on Teaching Hospitals in Egypt," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(10), pages 223-240, October.
    6. Wageeh A. Nafei, 2016. "Organizational Agility: The Key to Improve Organizational Performance," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(3), pages 97-111, March.
    7. Sanjai Kumar Shukla & Sushil & Manoj Kumar Sharma, 2019. "Managerial Paradox Toward Flexibility: Emergent Views Using Thematic Analysis of Literature," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 20(4), pages 349-370, December.
    8. Nafei Wageeh, 2016. "The Role of Organizational Agility in Enhancing Organizational Excellence: A Study on Telecommunications Sector in Egypt," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(4), pages 121-121, March.
    9. Ojha, Divesh & Patel, Pankaj C. & Sridharan, Sri V., 2020. "Dynamic strategic planning and firm competitive performance: A conceptualization and an empirical test," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    10. El-Khalil, Raed & Mezher, Mohamad Ali, 2020. "The mediating impact of sustainability on the relationship between agility and operational performance," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 7(C).
    11. Kieran Conboy, 2009. "Agility from First Principles: Reconstructing the Concept of Agility in Information Systems Development," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 329-354, September.
    12. Arslan Ayub & Farah Arzu & Hanan Iftekhar & Sabiha Hafeez, 2014. "Entrepreneurial Call for Strategic Agility in Fast-Paced Business Environment," Acta Universitatis Danubius. OEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 10(3), pages 146-154, June.
    13. Nogalski Bogdan & Niewiadomski Przemysław & Szpitter Agnieszka A., 2020. "Agility Versus Flexibility? The Perception of Business Model Maturity in Agricultural Machinery Sector Manufacturing Companies," Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, Sciendo, vol. 28(3), pages 57-97, September.
    14. Yui-Yip Lau & Adolf Ky Ng & David Guerrero, 2014. "Becoming a major hub in the distribution of wine: Hong Kong as a gate to Asian markets," Post-Print hal-01069882, HAL.
    15. Nafei Wageeh, 2016. "The Effect of Organizational Agility on Quality of Work Life: A Study on Commercial Banks in Egypt," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(6), pages 271-271, May.
    16. Ciampi, Francesco & Faraoni, Monica & Ballerini, Jacopo & Meli, Francesco, 2022. "The co-evolutionary relationship between digitalization and organizational agility: Ongoing debates, theoretical developments and future research perspectives," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    17. Marco Brand & Victor Tiberius & Peter M. Bican & Alexander Brem, 2021. "Agility as an innovation driver: towards an agile front end of innovation framework," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 157-187, January.
    18. Kim, Minkyun & Chai, Sangmi, 2017. "The impact of supplier innovativeness, information sharing and strategic sourcing on improving supply chain agility: Global supply chain perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 42-52.
    19. Nafei Wageeh, 2016. "Organizational Agility: The Key to Organizational Success," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(5), pages 296-296, April.
    20. Hossein Sayyadi Tooranloo & Sepideh Saghafi, 2019. "Investigating the Impact of Using Knowledge Management on Organisational Agility through Competitive Intelligence and Strategic Thinking," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(02), pages 1-31, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0249311. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.