IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0247144.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of a hybrid framework for inventory leanness in Technical Services Organizations

Author

Listed:
  • Khurram Rehmani
  • Afshan Naseem
  • Yasir Ahmad
  • Muhammad Zeeshan Mirza
  • Tasweer Hussain Syed

Abstract

Inherent uncertainties in demand and supply make it problematic for supply chains to accomplish optimum inventory replenishment, resulting in loss of sales or keeping excessive inventories. To cope with erratic demands, organizations have to maintain excessive inventory levels, sometimes taking up to one-third of an organization’s annual budget. The two most pressing concerns to handle in inventory management are: how much to order and when to order. Therefore, an organization ought to make the correct and timely decisions based on precise demand information to avoid excessive inventory accumulation resulting in enhanced competitive advantage. Owing to the significance of inventory control and analysis, this paper reports on developing and successfully implementing a hybrid framework for optimum level inventory forecasting in Technical Services Organizations. The proposed framework is based on a case study of one of Pakistan’s leading Technical Services Organization. The paper presents a statistical analysis of historical data and a comprehensive fault trend analysis. Both these analyses set a solid foundation for the formulation of a comparative analysis matrix based upon price and quantity based analysis of inventory. Finally, a decision criterion (Forecasting Model) is proposed using three primary forecasting techniques with minimum error calculations. The study’s finding shows a forecast error of 142.5 million rupees in the last five years, resulting in the accumulation of more than 25 thousand excessive inventory stock. Application of price and quantity based analysis identifies that 65% of the annual budget is significantly dependent upon only 9% (in terms of quantity) of "High Price and Small Quantity" Items (HS). These HS items are forecasted through three different forecasting methods, i.e., Weighted Moving Average, Exponential Smoothing, and Trend Projection, with Minimum Absolute Deviation to significantly reduce the forecasting error while predicting the future required quantity. The research work aims to contribute to the inventory management literature in three ways. First, a new comparative analysis matrix concept for identifying the most critical items is introduced. Second, a Multi-Criteria Forecasting Model is developed to capture a wide range of operations. Third, the paper suggests how these forecasting criteria can be integrated into a single interactive DSS to maintain optimum inventory level stock. Even though the DSS framework is based on data from a single organization, the application is expected to manage inventory stock in a wide range of manufacturing and services industries. This study’s proposed hybrid framework is the first of its kind that encapsulates all four dimensions of inventory classification criteria, forming a multi-criteria hybrid model within a DSS framework.

Suggested Citation

  • Khurram Rehmani & Afshan Naseem & Yasir Ahmad & Muhammad Zeeshan Mirza & Tasweer Hussain Syed, 2021. "Development of a hybrid framework for inventory leanness in Technical Services Organizations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(2), pages 1-13, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0247144
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247144
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0247144
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0247144&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0247144?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ford W. Harris, 1990. "How Many Parts to Make at Once," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 38(6), pages 947-950, December.
    2. Beutel, Anna-Lena & Minner, Stefan, 2012. "Safety stock planning under causal demand forecasting," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(2), pages 637-645.
    3. Prak, Dennis & Teunter, Ruud, 2019. "A general method for addressing forecasting uncertainty in inventory models," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 224-238.
    4. Janssen, Elleke & Strijbosch, Leo & Brekelmans, Ruud, 2009. "Assessing the effects of using demand parameters estimates in inventory control and improving the performance using a correction function," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(1), pages 34-42, March.
    5. Timothy J. Lowe & Leroy B. Schwarz, 1983. "Parameter estimation for the EOQ lot‐size model: Minimax and expected value choices," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(2), pages 367-376, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Prak, Dennis & Teunter, Ruud & Syntetos, Aris, 2017. "On the calculation of safety stocks when demand is forecasted," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 256(2), pages 454-461.
    2. Halkos, George & Kevork, Ilias, 2012. "Unbiased estimation of maximum expected profits in the Newsvendor Model: a case study analysis," MPRA Paper 40724, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Sharfuddin Lisan, 2018. "Safety stock determination of uncertain demand and mutually dependent variables," International Journal of Business and Social Research, LAR Center Press, vol. 8(3), pages 1-11, March.
    4. Sharfuddin Lisan, 2018. "Safety stock determination of uncertain demand and mutually dependent variables," International Journal of Business and Social Research, MIR Center for Socio-Economic Research, vol. 8(3), pages 1-11, March.
    5. Prak, Dennis & Teunter, Ruud, 2019. "A general method for addressing forecasting uncertainty in inventory models," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 224-238.
    6. Saoud, Patrick & Kourentzes, Nikolaos & Boylan, John E., 2022. "Approximations for the Lead Time Variance: a Forecasting and Inventory Evaluation," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    7. Serrano, Breno & Minner, Stefan & Schiffer, Maximilian & Vidal, Thibaut, 2024. "Bilevel optimization for feature selection in the data-driven newsvendor problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(2), pages 703-714.
    8. Meng Qi & Ying Cao & Zuo-Jun (Max) Shen, 2022. "Distributionally Robust Conditional Quantile Prediction with Fixed Design," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(3), pages 1639-1658, March.
    9. Van der Auweraer, Sarah & Boute, Robert N. & Syntetos, Aris A., 2019. "Forecasting spare part demand with installed base information: A review," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 181-196.
    10. Mou, Shandong & Robb, David J. & DeHoratius, Nicole, 2018. "Retail store operations: Literature review and research directions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(2), pages 399-422.
    11. Janssen, Larissa & Diabat, Ali & Sauer, Jürgen & Herrmann, Frank, 2018. "A stochastic micro-periodic age-based inventory replenishment policy for perishable goods," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 445-465.
    12. Trapero, Juan R. & Cardós, Manuel & Kourentzes, Nikolaos, 2019. "Empirical safety stock estimation based on kernel and GARCH models," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 199-211.
    13. Hong, Paul & Jagani, Sandeep & Kim, Jinhwan & Youn, Sun Hee, 2019. "Managing sustainability orientation: An empirical investigation of manufacturing firms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 71-81.
    14. Meyer, Anne & Amberg, Boris, 2018. "Transport concept selection considering supplier milk runs – An integrated model and a case study from the automotive industry," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 147-169.
    15. Trapero, Juan R. & Cardós, Manuel & Kourentzes, Nikolaos, 2019. "Quantile forecast optimal combination to enhance safety stock estimation," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 239-250.
    16. Dipak Barman & Gour Chandra Mahata, 2022. "Two-echelon production inventory model with imperfect quality items with ordering cost reduction depending on controllable lead time," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 13(5), pages 2656-2671, October.
    17. Yang, Cheng-Hu & Wang, Hai-Tang & Ma, Xin & Talluri, Srinivas, 2023. "A data-driven newsvendor problem: A high-dimensional and mixed-frequency method," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    18. Badorf, Florian & Hoberg, Kai, 2020. "The impact of daily weather on retail sales: An empirical study in brick-and-mortar stores," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    19. Bin Shen & Hau-Ling Chan, 2017. "Forecast Information Sharing for Managing Supply Chains in the Big Data Era: Recent Development and Future Research," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 34(01), pages 1-26, February.
    20. Heibatolah Sadeghi & Hêriş Golpîra & Faicel Hnaien & Cosimo Magazzino, 2023. "Pricing-inventory model with discrete demand and delivery orders," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 33(3), pages 119-139.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0247144. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.