IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0239394.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analyzing drivers’ perceived service quality of variable message signs (VMS)

Author

Listed:
  • Zhuanglin Ma
  • Mingjie Luo
  • Steven I-Jy Chien
  • Dawei Hu
  • Xue Zhao

Abstract

Recent advance in VMS technology has made it viable to ease traffic congestion and improve road traffic efficiency. However, the drivers’ low compliance with the posted information may limit its performance to ease traffic congestion and improve traffic safety. This paper explores drivers’ attitude to the service quality of VMS system resulted from the identified predominant influencing factors. A questionnaire is developed and used for surveying 9,600 drivers in Beijing, China. The collected data are analyzed with a multiple indicators and multiple causes (MIMIC) model considering different driver categories (e.g., private car driver, office car driver, taxi driver). The results show that the causal relationships between latent variables and socio-demographic characteristic is significant. Driving frequency, attitude towards contents of VMS, drivers’ decision-making and the effectiveness of VMS message can directly and indirectly affect driver’s perceived quality of service. The attitude towards formats of VMS indirectly affect their QoS resulting from the effectiveness of VMS message, while there is no indirect impact for taxi drivers. Besides, the drivers’ decision-making directly affects the perceived quality of service for private car drivers and office car drivers, but there is no impact for taxi drivers. The findings of this study can provide guidance and reference for urban authorities to perform the relevant actions required to meet user expectations.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhuanglin Ma & Mingjie Luo & Steven I-Jy Chien & Dawei Hu & Xue Zhao, 2020. "Analyzing drivers’ perceived service quality of variable message signs (VMS)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-19, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0239394
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239394
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0239394
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0239394&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0239394?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Allen, Jaime & Bellizzi, Maria Grazia & Eboli, Laura & Forciniti, Carmen & Mazzulla, Gabriella, 2020. "Service quality in a mid-sized air terminal: A SEM-MIMIC ordinal probit accounting for travel, sociodemographic, and user-type heterogeneity," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    2. Feng Chen & Mingtao Song & Xiaoxiang Ma, 2019. "Investigation on the Injury Severity of Drivers in Rear-End Collisions Between Cars Using a Random Parameters Bivariate Ordered Probit Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-12, July.
    3. Goldberger, Arthur S, 1972. "Structural Equation Methods in the Social Sciences," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 40(6), pages 979-1001, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Haorong Peng & Xiaoxiang Ma & Feng Chen, 2020. "Examining Injury Severity of Pedestrians in Vehicle–Pedestrian Crashes at Mid-Blocks Using Path Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-16, August.
    2. Mao, Lu, 2022. "Identification of the outcome distribution and sensitivity analysis under weak confounder–instrument interaction," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    3. Francesco Agostinelli & Matthew Wiswall, 2016. "Identification of Dynamic Latent Factor Models: The Implications of Re-Normalization in a Model of Child Development," NBER Working Papers 22441, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Magnusson, Leandro M. & Tarverdi, Yashar, 2020. "Measuring governance: Why do errors matter?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    5. George Halkos & Kyriaki Tsilika, 2015. "Programming Identification Criteria in Simultaneous Equation Models," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 46(1), pages 157-170, June.
    6. Christopher L. Gilbert & Duo Qin, 2005. "The First Fifty Years of Modern Econometrics," Working Papers 544, Queen Mary University of London, School of Economics and Finance.
    7. Hongjun Cui & Mingzhi Li & Minqing Zhu & Xinwei Ma, 2023. "Investigating the Impacts of Urban–Rural Bus Service Quality on Rural Residents’ Travel Choices Using an SEM–MNL Integration Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-22, August.
    8. Chandra Mahapatra, Subas & Bellamkonda, Raja Shekhar, 2023. "Higher expectations of passengers do really sense: Development and validation a multiple scale-FliQual for air transport service quality," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    9. Changxi Ma & Jibiao Zhou & Dong Yang, 2020. "Causation Analysis of Hazardous Material Road Transportation Accidents Based on the Ordered Logit Regression Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-25, February.
    10. Ben-Moshe, Dan, 2018. "Identification Of Joint Distributions In Dependent Factor Models," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 34(1), pages 134-165, February.
    11. Afaq Khattak & Hamad Almujibah & Ahmed Elamary & Caroline Mongina Matara, 2022. "Interpretable Dynamic Ensemble Selection Approach for the Prediction of Road Traffic Injury Severity: A Case Study of Pakistan’s National Highway N-5," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-18, September.
    12. Andrew K. Rose & Mark M. Spiegel, 2010. "Cross‐Country Causes And Consequences Of The 2008 Crisis: International Linkages And American Exposure," Pacific Economic Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(3), pages 340-363, August.
    13. Esmailpour, Javad & Aghabayk, Kayvan & Aghajanzadeh, Mohammad & De Gruyter, Chris, 2022. "Has COVID-19 changed our loyalty towards public transport? Understanding the moderating role of the pandemic in the relationship between service quality, customer satisfaction and loyalty," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 80-103.
    14. Zheng Chen & Huiying Wen & Qiang Zhu & Sheng Zhao, 2023. "Severity Analysis of Multi-Truck Crashes on Mountain Freeways Using a Mixed Logit Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-15, April.
    15. Jorgensen, Bradley S. & Wilson, Mathew A. & Heberlein, Thomas A., 2001. "Fairness in the contingent valuation of environmental public goods: attitude toward paying for environmental improvements at two levels of scope," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 133-148, January.
    16. Jiang, Xiaomo & Mahadevan, Sankaran, 2009. "Bayesian structural equation modeling method for hierarchical model validation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(4), pages 796-809.
    17. Kanghyun Kim & Jungyeol Hong, 2023. "Severity Predictions for Intercity Bus Crashes on Highway Using a Random Parameter Ordered Probit Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-15, August.
    18. Lin, Yi-Hsin & Wu, Hanjun & He, Hang & Tsui, Kan Wai Hong, 2023. "Changes in perceptions of airport services’ attributes: An assessment of the impacts of COVID-19," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 116-128.
    19. Joshua D. Angrist & Guido W. Imbens & D.B. Rubin, 1993. "Identification of Causal Effects Using Instrumental Variables," NBER Technical Working Papers 0136, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    20. Mahyar Madarshahian & Aditya Balaram & Fahim Ahmed & Nathan Huynh & Chowdhury K. A. Siddiqui & Mark Ferguson, 2023. "Analysis of Injury Severity of Work Zone Truck-Involved Crashes in South Carolina for Interstates and Non-Interstates," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-18, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0239394. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.