IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0237717.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effect of task-irrelevant spatial contexts on 360-degree attention

Author

Listed:
  • Yuki Harada
  • Junji Ohyama

Abstract

The effect of spatial contexts on attention is important for evaluating the risk of human errors and the accessibility of information in different situations. In traditional studies, this effect has been investigated using display-based and non-laboratory procedures. However, these two procedures are inadequate for measuring attention directed toward 360-degree environments and controlling exogeneous stimuli. In order to resolve these limitations, we used a virtual-reality-based procedure and investigated how spatial contexts of 360-degree environments influence attention. In the experiment, 20 students were asked to search for and report a target that was presented at any location in 360-degree virtual spaces as accurately and quickly as possible. Spatial contexts comprised a basic context (a grey and objectless space) and three specific contexts (a square grid floor, a cubic room, and an infinite floor). We found that response times for the task and eye movements were influenced by the spatial context of 360-degree surrounding spaces. In particular, although total viewing times for the contexts did not match the saliency maps, the differences in total viewing times between the basic and specific contexts did resemble the maps. These results suggest that attention comprises basic and context-dependent characteristics, and the latter are influenced by the saliency of 360-degree contexts even when the contexts are irrelevant to a task.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuki Harada & Junji Ohyama, 2020. "The effect of task-irrelevant spatial contexts on 360-degree attention," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-14, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0237717
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237717
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0237717
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0237717&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0237717?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dmitry Kit & Leor Katz & Brian Sullivan & Kat Snyder & Dana Ballard & Mary Hayhoe, 2014. "Eye Movements, Visual Search and Scene Memory, in an Immersive Virtual Environment," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(4), pages 1-11, April.
    2. Jeremy M. Wolfe & Todd S. Horowitz, 2017. "Five factors that guide attention in visual search," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 1(3), pages 1-8, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Devdeepta Bose & Henning Cordes & Sven Nolte & Judith Christiane Schneider & Colin Farrell Camerer, 2022. "Decision Weights for Experimental Asset Prices Based on Visual Salience," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 35(11), pages 5094-5126.
    2. Joseph W. MacInnes & Roopali Bhatnagar, 2017. "Where Does Attention Go When Facilitation is Absent?," HSE Working papers WP BRP 85/PSY/2017, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    3. Frank van der Horst & Joshua Snell & Jan Theeuwes, 2021. "Enhancing banknote authentication by guiding attention to security features and prevalence expectancy," Working Papers 716, DNB.
    4. Maxim A. Ulanov & Yury Y. Shtyrov & Tatiana A. Stroganova, 2017. "Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation as a Tool to Induce Language Recovery in Patients with Post-Stroke Aphasia: An Overview of Studies," HSE Working papers WP BRP 86/PSY/2017, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    5. Anna S. Gracheva & Ekaterina O. Ivanina & Yuri A. Markov & Elena S. Gorbunova, 2018. "Search for familiar and dangerous: not seeing gopnik in the crowd," HSE Working papers WP BRP 96/PSY/2018, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    6. Frank van der Horst & Jelle Miedema & Joshua Snell & Jan Theeuwes, 2020. "Banknote verification relies on vision, feel and a single second," Working Papers 680, DNB.
    7. Teppo Felin & Stuart Kauffman & Todd Zenger, 2023. "Resource origins and search," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(6), pages 1514-1533, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0237717. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.