IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nathum/v1y2017i3d10.1038_s41562-017-0058.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Five factors that guide attention in visual search

Author

Listed:
  • Jeremy M. Wolfe

    (Visual Attention Lab, Brigham and Women's Hospital)

  • Todd S. Horowitz

    (Basic Biobehavioral and Psychological Sciences Branch, Behavioral Research Program, National Cancer Institute)

Abstract

How do we find what we are looking for? Even when the desired target is in the current field of view, we need to search because fundamental limits on visual processing make it impossible to recognize everything at once. Searching involves directing attention to objects that might be the target. This deployment of attention is not random. It is guided to the most promising items and locations by five factors discussed here: bottom-up salience, top-down feature guidance, scene structure and meaning, the previous history of search over timescales ranging from milliseconds to years, and the relative value of the targets and distractors. Modern theories of visual search need to incorporate all five factors and specify how these factors combine to shape search behaviour. An understanding of the rules of guidance can be used to improve the accuracy and efficiency of socially important search tasks, from security screening to medical image perception.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeremy M. Wolfe & Todd S. Horowitz, 2017. "Five factors that guide attention in visual search," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 1(3), pages 1-8, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:nat:nathum:v:1:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1038_s41562-017-0058
    DOI: 10.1038/s41562-017-0058
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-017-0058
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41562-017-0058?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Frank van der Horst & Jelle Miedema & Joshua Snell & Jan Theeuwes, 2020. "Banknote verification relies on vision, feel and a single second," Working Papers 680, DNB.
    2. Joseph W. MacInnes & Roopali Bhatnagar, 2017. "Where Does Attention Go When Facilitation is Absent?," HSE Working papers WP BRP 85/PSY/2017, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    3. Frank van der Horst & Joshua Snell & Jan Theeuwes, 2021. "Enhancing banknote authentication by guiding attention to security features and prevalence expectancy," Working Papers 716, DNB.
    4. Maxim A. Ulanov & Yury Y. Shtyrov & Tatiana A. Stroganova, 2017. "Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation as a Tool to Induce Language Recovery in Patients with Post-Stroke Aphasia: An Overview of Studies," HSE Working papers WP BRP 86/PSY/2017, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    5. Yuki Harada & Junji Ohyama, 2020. "The effect of task-irrelevant spatial contexts on 360-degree attention," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-14, August.
    6. Teppo Felin & Stuart Kauffman & Todd Zenger, 2023. "Resource origins and search," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(6), pages 1514-1533, June.
    7. Devdeepta Bose & Henning Cordes & Sven Nolte & Judith Christiane Schneider & Colin Farrell Camerer, 2022. "Decision Weights for Experimental Asset Prices Based on Visual Salience," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 35(11), pages 5094-5126.
    8. Anna S. Gracheva & Ekaterina O. Ivanina & Yuri A. Markov & Elena S. Gorbunova, 2018. "Search for familiar and dangerous: not seeing gopnik in the crowd," HSE Working papers WP BRP 96/PSY/2018, National Research University Higher School of Economics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nathum:v:1:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1038_s41562-017-0058. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.