IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0237003.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Barriers to entering race training before 4 years of age for Thoroughbred horses born in the 2014 Australian foal crop

Author

Listed:
  • Meredith L Flash
  • Adelene S M Wong
  • Mark A Stevenson
  • James R Gilkerson

Abstract

Currently, there is a paucity of data on the barriers for Australian Thoroughbred horses transitioning from stud farm to racetrack. This paper reports the reasons why horses failed to enter race training and documents their exit destinations. Biographical records of Australian Thoroughbred horses born in 2014 were investigated to determine the number of horses that had not officially entered race training by the start of the 4-year old racing season (1 August 2018). Of the 13,677 foals born in 2014, 66% had commenced training and 51% had raced before the beginning of their 4-year-old season in Australia. A sampling frame based on the post code of the premises where foals were born and records from Racing Australia were used to select a geographically representative sample of the 2014 Australian Thoroughbred foal crop (n = 4,124). From the population eligible for sampling 1,275 horses that had not entered training were enrolled in the survey and their breeders were sent an online questionnaire with follow-up phone calls for those who had not responded. Of the 633 responses (50% of 1275) the most frequent outcomes for horses were: death (38%, n = 239), participation in the racing industry in their 4-year old racing season (24%, n = 154) and retirement (16%, n = 100) either as Australian Stud Book (ASB) bloodstock (n = 17), or as horses rehomed outside the Thoroughbred industry (n = 83). Illness or injury was the most frequent reason for horses not entering race training that were ASB bloodstock, rehomed or deceased. There was a loss of traceability at the point of sale with most horses sold at 1 year of age. This study provides important information on the reasons, alternative outcomes and gaps in traceability for horses not entering training prior to the 4-year-old racing season.

Suggested Citation

  • Meredith L Flash & Adelene S M Wong & Mark A Stevenson & James R Gilkerson, 2020. "Barriers to entering race training before 4 years of age for Thoroughbred horses born in the 2014 Australian foal crop," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-15, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0237003
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0237003
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0237003&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0237003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stevens, Don L. & Olsen, Anthony R., 2004. "Spatially Balanced Sampling of Natural Resources," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 99, pages 262-278, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lorenzo Fattorini & Timothy G. Gregoire & Sara Trentini, 2018. "The Use of Calibration Weighting for Variance Estimation Under Systematic Sampling: Applications to Forest Cover Assessment," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 23(3), pages 358-373, September.
    2. Anton Grafström & Niklas L. P. Lundström & Lina Schelin, 2012. "Spatially Balanced Sampling through the Pivotal Method," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 68(2), pages 514-520, June.
    3. Xin Zhao & Anton Grafström, 2020. "A sample coordination method to monitor totals of environmental variables," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(6), September.
    4. Linda Altieri & Daniela Cocchi, 2021. "Spatial Sampling for Non‐compact Patterns," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 89(3), pages 532-549, December.
    5. Matthew Nahorniak & David P Larsen & Carol Volk & Chris E Jordan, 2015. "Using Inverse Probability Bootstrap Sampling to Eliminate Sample Induced Bias in Model Based Analysis of Unequal Probability Samples," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-19, June.
    6. Robertson, Blair & Price, Chris, 2024. "One point per cluster spatially balanced sampling," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    7. Alcasena, Fermín J. & Salis, Michele & Nauslar, Nicholas J. & Aguinaga, A. Eduardo & Vega-García, Cristina, 2016. "Quantifying economic losses from wildfires in black pine afforestations of northern Spain," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 153-167.
    8. Kathryn M. Irvine & T. J. Rodhouse & Ilai N. Keren, 2016. "Extending Ordinal Regression with a Latent Zero-Augmented Beta Distribution," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 21(4), pages 619-640, December.
    9. B. L. Robertson & J. A. Brown & T. McDonald & P. Jaksons, 2013. "BAS: Balanced Acceptance Sampling of Natural Resources," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 69(3), pages 776-784, September.
    10. Shepherd, Keith D. & Shepherd, Gemma & Walsh, Markus G., 2015. "Land health surveillance and response: A framework for evidence-informed land management," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 93-106.
    11. Lorenzo Fattorini & Marzia Marcheselli & Caterina Pisani & Luca Pratelli, 2022. "Design‐based properties of the nearest neighbor spatial interpolator and its bootstrap mean squared error estimator," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(4), pages 1454-1463, December.
    12. Robertson, B.L. & McDonald, T. & Price, C.J. & Brown, J.A., 2017. "A modification of balanced acceptance sampling," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 107-112.
    13. Maria Michela Dickson & Yves Tillé, 2016. "Ordered spatial sampling by means of the traveling salesman problem," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 31(4), pages 1359-1372, December.
    14. Xuli Zan & Zuliang Zhao & Wei Liu & Xiaodong Zhang & Zhe Liu & Shaoming Li & Dehai Zhu, 2019. "The Layout of Maize Variety Test Sites Based on the Spatiotemporal Classification of the Planting Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-15, July.
    15. McHugh, Peter A. & Saunders, W. Carl & Bouwes, Nicolaas & Wall, C. Eric & Bangen, Sara & Wheaton, Joseph M. & Nahorniak, Matthew & Ruzycki, James R. & Tattam, Ian A. & Jordan, Chris E., 2017. "Linking models across scales to assess the viability and restoration potential of a threatened population of steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in the Middle Fork John Day River, Oregon, USA," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 355(C), pages 24-38.
    16. Guillaume Chauvet & Ronan Le Gleut, 2021. "Inference under pivotal sampling: Properties, variance estimation, and application to tesselation for spatial sampling," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 48(1), pages 108-131, March.
    17. Steen Magnussen & Johannes Breidenbach, 2020. "Retrieval of among-stand variances from one observation per stand," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 66(4), pages 133-149.
    18. Gideon Minua Kwaku Ampofo & Prosper Basommi Laari & Emmanuel Opoku Ware & Williams Shaw, 2023. "Further investigation of the total natural resource rents and economic growth nexus in resource-abundant sub-Saharan African countries," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 36(1), pages 97-121, January.
    19. Maria Michela Dickson & Giuseppe Espa & Diego Giuliani, 2016. "Incomplete geocoding and spatial sampling: the effects of locational errors on population total estimation," DEM Working Papers 2016/04, Department of Economics and Management.
    20. Yves Tillé, 2022. "Some Solutions Inspired by Survey Sampling Theory to Build Effective Clinical Trials," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 90(3), pages 481-498, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0237003. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.