IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0231819.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparability of modern contraceptive use estimates between a face-to-face survey and a cellphone survey among women in Burkina Faso

Author

Listed:
  • Abigail R Greenleaf
  • Aliou Gadiaga
  • Georges Guiella
  • Shani Turke
  • Noelle Battle
  • Saifuddin Ahmed
  • Caroline Moreau

Abstract

Introduction: The proliferation of cell phone ownership in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) presents the opportunity to collect public health indicators at a lower cost compared to face-to-face (FTF) surveys. This analysis assesses the equivalence of modern contraceptive prevalence estimates between a nationally representative FTF survey and a cell phone survey using random digit dialing (RDD) among women of reproductive age in Burkina Faso. Methods: We analyzed data from two surveys conducted in Burkina Faso between December 2017 and May 2018. The FTF survey conducted by Performance Monitoring and Accountability (PMA2020) comprised a nationally representative sample of 3,556 women of reproductive age (15–49 years). The RDD survey was conducted using computer-assisted telephone interviewing and included 2,379 women of reproductive age. Results: Compared to FTF respondents, women in the RDD sample were younger, were more likely to have a secondary degree and to speak French. RDD respondents were more likely to report using modern contraceptive use (40%) compared to FTF respondents (26%) and the difference remained unchanged after applying post-stratification weights to the RDD sample (39%). This difference surpassed the equivalence margin of 4%. The RDD sample also produced higher estimates of contraceptive use than the subsample of women who owned a phone in the FTF sample (32%). After adjusting for women’s sociodemographic factors, the odds of contraceptive use were 1.9 times higher (95% CI: 1.6–2.2) in the RDD survey compared to the FTF survey and 1.6 times higher (95% CI: 1.3–1.8) compared to FTF phone owners. Conclusions: Modern contraceptive prevalence in Burkina Faso is over-estimated when using a cell phone RDD survey, even after adjusting for a number of sociodemographic factors. Further research should explore causes of differential estimates of modern contraceptive use by survey modes.

Suggested Citation

  • Abigail R Greenleaf & Aliou Gadiaga & Georges Guiella & Shani Turke & Noelle Battle & Saifuddin Ahmed & Caroline Moreau, 2020. "Comparability of modern contraceptive use estimates between a face-to-face survey and a cellphone survey among women in Burkina Faso," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-15, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0231819
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231819
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0231819
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0231819&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0231819?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joseph Larmarange & Ouattara Kassoum & Élise Kakou & Yves Fradier & Lazare Sika & Christine Danel & Catriona Dutreuilh, 2016. "Feasibility and Representativeness of a Random Sample Mobile Phone Survey in Côte d’Ivoire," Population (english edition), Institut National d'Études Démographiques (INED), vol. 0(1), pages 117-129.
    2. Kelly L’Engle & Eunice Sefa & Edward Akolgo Adimazoya & Emmanuel Yartey & Rachel Lenzi & Cindy Tarpo & Nii Lante Heward-Mills & Katherine Lew & Yvonne Ampeh, 2018. "Survey research with a random digit dial national mobile phone sample in Ghana: Methods and sample quality," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anderson, Ellen & Lybbert, Travis J. & Shenoy, Ashish & Singh, Rupika & Stein, Daniel, 2024. "Does survey mode matter? Comparing in-person and phone agricultural surveys in India," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    2. Carletto,Calogero & Dillon,Andrew S. & Zezza,Alberto, 2021. "Agricultural Data Collection to Minimize Measurement Error and Maximize Coverage," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9745, The World Bank.
    3. Sofia Amaral & Lelys Dinarte-Diaz & Patricio Dominguez & Steffanny Romero & Santiago M. Perez-Vincent, 2022. "Talk or Text? Evaluating Response Rates by Remote Survey Method during Covid-19," CESifo Working Paper Series 9517, CESifo.
    4. Jethro Banda & Albert Dube & Sarah Brumfield & Abena Amoah & Amelia Crampin & Georges Reniers & Stephane Helleringer, 2021. "Knowledge, risk perceptions, and behaviors related to the COVID-19 pandemic in Malawi," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 44(20), pages 459-480.
    5. Glazerman, Steven & Grépin, Karen A. & Mueller, Valerie & Rosenbaum, Michael & Wu, Nicole, 2023. "Do referrals improve the representation of women in mobile phone surveys?," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    6. Kaushalendra Kumar & Abhishek Singh & Amy Tsui, 2022. "Measuring contraceptive use in India: Implications of recent fieldwork design and implementation of the National Family Health Survey," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 47(4), pages 73-110.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gourlay, Sydney & Kilic, Talip & Martuscelli, Antonio & Wollburg, Philip & Zezza, Alberto, 2021. "Viewpoint: High-frequency phone surveys on COVID-19: Good practices, open questions," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    2. Joshua Brubaker & Talip Kilic & Philip Wollburg, 2021. "Representativeness of individual-level data in COVID-19 phone surveys: Findings from Sub-Saharan Africa," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(11), pages 1-27, November.
    3. Monteiro Amaral,Sofia Fernando & Dinarte Diaz,Lelys Ileana & Dominguez,Patricio & Perez-Vincent,Santiago M. & Romero,Steffanny, 2022. "Talk or Text ? Evaluating Response Rates by Remote Survey Method during COVID-19," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9999, The World Bank.
    4. Elisa M. Maffioli, 2020. "Collecting Data During an Epidemic: A Novel Mobile Phone Research Method," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(8), pages 1231-1255, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0231819. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.