IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0231248.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lessons learned from using respondent-driven sampling (RDS) to assess sexual risk behaviors among Kenyan young adults living in urban slum settlements: A process evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Larissa Jennings Mayo-Wilson
  • Muthoni Mathai
  • Grace Yi
  • Margaret O Mak’anyengo
  • Melissa Davoust
  • Massah L Massaquoi
  • Stefan Baral
  • Fred M Ssewamala
  • Nancy E Glass
  • NAHEDO Study Group

Abstract

Background: Respondent-driven sampling (RDS) is a peer-referral sampling methodology used to estimate characteristics of underserved groups that cannot be randomly sampled. RDS has been implemented in several settings to identify hidden populations at risk for HIV, but few studies have reported the methodological lessons learned on RDS design and implementation for assessing sexual risk behaviors in marginalized youth. Methods: We used RDS to recruit N = 350 young adults, aged 18 to 22, who were living in urban slum settlements in Nairobi, Kenya. A structured survey was used to assess sexual risk behaviors. Twenty seeds were selected and asked to recruit up to three eligible peers. We used small monetary incentives and a three-day recruitment coupon with sequential numbers linking recruiters to their recruits. Results: Data collection was completed in 8 days with a maximum chain length of 6 waves. Each seed yielded 16 to 21 eligible recruits. Three (15%) seeds were unproductive and were replaced. RDS benefits were high identification rates (90% coupons returned per coupons given), high eligibility rates (100% eligible recruits per coupons returned), and high efficiency (~39 eligible recruits per day). 44% of the sample was female. Most recruits (74%) reported being “friends” for 7+ years with their recruiter. RDS overcame feasibility concerns of household-, clinic-, and school-based sampling methodologies in that underserved youth who were unemployed (68%), out of school (48%), ethnic minorities (26%), and having prior residential instability (≥2 moves in the past year) (20%) were successfully recruited, based on weighted analyses. Youth reporting HIV risk behaviors, including unprotected sex (38%), sex while high/drunk (35%), and sex exchange for pay (14%), were also enrolled. However, 28% were not sexually active within the last 6 months. Challenges included managing wait times during peaks and participant referral expectations. Community engagement, use of study-stamped coupons, broad inclusion criteria, incentives, and study sites within walking distances all contributed to the successful implementation of the sampling methodology. Conclusion: RDS is an important tool in reaching a diverse sample of underserved and at-risk young adults for study participation. Implications for optimizing RDS for behavioral studies in this population are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Larissa Jennings Mayo-Wilson & Muthoni Mathai & Grace Yi & Margaret O Mak’anyengo & Melissa Davoust & Massah L Massaquoi & Stefan Baral & Fred M Ssewamala & Nancy E Glass & NAHEDO Study Group, 2020. "Lessons learned from using respondent-driven sampling (RDS) to assess sexual risk behaviors among Kenyan young adults living in urban slum settlements: A process evaluation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-22, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0231248
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231248
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0231248
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0231248&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0231248?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Krista J. Gile & Lisa G. Johnston & Matthew J. Salganik, 2015. "Diagnostics for respondent-driven sampling," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 178(1), pages 241-269, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fatemi, Samira & Salehi, Mostafa & Veisi, Hadi & Jalili, Mahdi, 2018. "A fuzzy logic based estimator for respondent driven sampling of complex networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 510(C), pages 42-51.
    2. Lucinda Platt & Renee Luthra & Tom Frere-Smith, 2015. "Adapting chain referral methods to sample new migrants," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 33(24), pages 665-700.
    3. Lee Sunghee & Ong Ai Rene & Elliott Michael, 2020. "Exploring Mechanisms of Recruitment and Recruitment Cooperation in Respondent Driven Sampling," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 36(2), pages 339-360, June.
    4. Luis E. C. Rocha & Anna E. Thorson & Renaud Lambiotte & Fredrik Liljeros, 2017. "Respondent-driven sampling bias induced by community structure and response rates in social networks," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 180(1), pages 99-118, January.
    5. Aronow, Peter M. & Crawford, Forrest W., 2015. "Nonparametric identification for respondent-driven sampling," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 100-102.
    6. Johanna Jonsson & Mart Stein & Gun Johansson & Theo Bodin & Susanne Strömdahl, 2019. "A performance assessment of web-based respondent driven sampling among workers with precarious employment in Sweden," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, January.
    7. Eleni D. Rompoti & Alexis D. Ioannides, 2023. "“Pseudo-Contracted” Workers as a Means of Bypassing Labour Law in Greece," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-27, November.
    8. Héctor Mullo & Ismael Sánchez-Borrego & Sara Pasadas-del-Amo, 2020. "Respondent-Driven Sampling for Surveying Ethnic Minorities in Ecuador," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-17, November.
    9. Lee Sunghee & Suzer-Gurtekin Tuba & Wagner James & Valliant Richard, 2017. "Total Survey Error and Respondent Driven Sampling: Focus on Nonresponse and Measurement Errors in the Recruitment Process and the Network Size Reports and Implications for Inferences," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 33(2), pages 335-366, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0231248. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.