IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0231149.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing statistical analyses to estimate thresholds in ecotoxicology

Author

Listed:
  • Marcos Krull

Abstract

Different methods are used in ecotoxicology to estimate thresholds in survival data. This paper uses Monte Carlo simulations to evaluate the accuracy of three methods (maximum likelihood (MLE) and Markov Chain Monte Carlo estimates (Bayesian) of the no-effect concentration (NEC) model and Piecewise regression) in estimating true and apparent thresholds in survival experiments with datasets having different slopes, background mortalities, and experimental designs. Datasets were generated with models that include a threshold parameter (NEC) or not (log-logistic). Accuracy was estimated using root-mean square errors (RMSEs), and RMSE ratios were used to estimate the relative improvement in accuracy by each design and method. All methods had poor performances in shallow and intermediate curves, and accuracy increased with the slope of the curve. The EC5 was generally the most accurate method to estimate true and apparent thresholds, except for steep curves with a true threshold. In that case, the EC5 underestimated the threshold, and MLE and Bayesian estimates were more accurate. In most cases, information criteria weights did not provide strong evidence in support of the true model, suggesting that identifying the true model is a difficult task. Piecewise regression was the only method where the information criteria weights had high support for the threshold model; however, the rate of spurious threshold model selection was also high. Even though thresholds are an attractive concept from a regulatory and practical point of view, threshold estimates, under the experimental conditions evaluated in this work, should be carefully used in survival analysis or when there are any biological reasons to support the existence of a threshold.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcos Krull, 2020. "Comparing statistical analyses to estimate thresholds in ecotoxicology," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-16, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0231149
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231149
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0231149
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0231149&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0231149?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Baas, J. & Jager, T. & Kooijman, S.A.L.M., 2009. "Estimation of no effect concentrations from exposure experiments when values scatter among individuals," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(3), pages 411-418.
    2. Killick, Rebecca & Eckley, Idris A., 2014. "changepoint: An R Package for Changepoint Analysis," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 58(i03).
    3. Ritz, Christian & Streibig, Jens C., 2005. "Bioassay Analysis Using R," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 12(i05).
    4. S. A. L. M. Kooijman & J. J. M. Bedaux & W. Slob, 1996. "No‐Effect Concentration as a Basis for Ecological Risk Assessment," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(4), pages 445-447, August.
    5. Kampstra, Peter, 2008. "Beanplot: A Boxplot Alternative for Visual Comparison of Distributions," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 28(c01).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Petter Arnesen & Odd A. Hjelkrem, 2018. "An Estimator for Traffic Breakdown Probability Based on Classification of Transitional Breakdown Events," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(3), pages 593-602, June.
    2. Malte Willmes & Katherine M Ransom & Levi S Lewis & Christian T Denney & Justin J G Glessner & James A Hobbs, 2018. "IsoFishR: An application for reproducible data reduction and analysis of strontium isotope ratios (87Sr/86Sr) obtained via laser-ablation MC-ICP-MS," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(9), pages 1-15, September.
    3. Salvatore Fasola & Vito M. R. Muggeo & Helmut Küchenhoff, 2018. "A heuristic, iterative algorithm for change-point detection in abrupt change models," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 997-1015, June.
    4. Camilo Guzmán & Manish Bagga & Amanpreet Kaur & Jukka Westermarck & Daniel Abankwa, 2014. "ColonyArea: An ImageJ Plugin to Automatically Quantify Colony Formation in Clonogenic Assays," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-9, March.
    5. Chanseok Park & Min Wang, 2024. "Parameter Estimation of Birnbaum-Saunders Distribution under Competing Risks Using the Quantile Variant of the Expectation-Maximization Algorithm," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-17, June.
    6. Hui Zhang & Minna Väliranta & Graeme T. Swindles & Marco A. Aquino-López & Donal Mullan & Ning Tan & Matthew Amesbury & Kirill V. Babeshko & Kunshan Bao & Anatoly Bobrov & Viktor Chernyshov & Marissa , 2022. "Recent climate change has driven divergent hydrological shifts in high-latitude peatlands," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-7, December.
    7. Jens Peter Andersen & Björn Hammarfelt, 2011. "Price revisited: on the growth of dissertations in eight research fields," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 88(2), pages 371-383, August.
    8. Subhashis Chatterjee & Ankur Shukla, 2016. "Change point–based software reliability model under imperfect debugging with revised concept of fault dependency," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 230(6), pages 579-597, December.
    9. Dehler-Holland, Joris & Okoh, Marvin & Keles, Dogan, 2022. "Assessing technology legitimacy with topic models and sentiment analysis – The case of wind power in Germany," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    10. Manfren, Massimiliano & Nastasi, Benedetto, 2023. "Interpretable data-driven building load profiles modelling for Measurement and Verification 2.0," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    11. Li, Boyan & Diao, Xundi, 2023. "Structural break in different stock index markets in China," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    12. LonÄ arić, Željka & K. Hackenberger, Branimir, 2013. "Stage and age structured Aedes vexans and Culex pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae) climate-dependent matrix population model," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 82-94.
    13. Ibrar ul Hassan Akhtar, 2023. "Exploring Covid-19 Pandemic Initial 2020 Curve Based On Statistical Evaluation," Acta Scientifica Malaysia (ASM), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 7(1), pages 08-16, February.
    14. Carolina Müller & Manja Hethke & Frank Riedel & Gerhard Helle, 2020. "Inter- and intra-tree variability of carbon and oxygen stable isotope ratios of modern pollen from nine European tree species," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-35, June.
    15. Jaller, Miguel & Pineda, Leticia, 2017. "Warehousing and Distribution Center Facilities in Southern California: The Use of the Commodity Flow Survey Data to Identify Logistics Sprawl and Freight Generation Patterns," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt5dz0j1gg, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    16. Sevvandi Kandanaarachchi & Rob J Hyndman & Kate Smith-Miles, 2020. "Early classification of spatio-temporal events using partial information," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-39, August.
    17. Beytía, Pablo & Infante, Carlos Cruz, 2020. "Digital Pathways, Pandemic Trajectories. Using Google Trends to Track Social Responses to COVID-19," SocArXiv yndb7_v1, Center for Open Science.
    18. Brice B. Hanberry, 2021. "Timing of Tree Density Increases, Influence of Climate Change, and a Land Use Proxy for Tree Density Increases in the Eastern United States," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-17, October.
    19. Li He & Yuàn Wang & Yi Wang & Ren-Gang Zhang & Yuán Wang & Elvira Hörandl & Tao Ma & Yan-Fei Mao & Judith E. Mank & Ray Ming, 2024. "Allopolyploidization from two dioecious ancestors leads to recurrent evolution of sex chromosomes," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.
    20. Hossein Hassani & Mohammad Reza Yeganegi & Rangan Gupta, 2020. "Historical Forecasting Of Interest Rate Mean And Volatility Of The United States: Is There A Role Of Uncertainty?," Annals of Financial Economics (AFE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(04), pages 1-17, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0231149. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.