IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0227884.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving measurement of child abuse and neglect: A systematic review and analysis of national prevalence studies

Author

Listed:
  • Ben Mathews
  • Rosana Pacella
  • Michael P Dunne
  • Marko Simunovic
  • Cicely Marston

Abstract

Objectives: Child maltreatment through physical abuse, sexual abuse, emotional abuse, neglect, and exposure to domestic violence, causes substantial adverse health, educational and behavioural consequences through the lifespan. The generation of reliable data on the prevalence and characteristics of child maltreatment in nationwide populations is essential to plan and evaluate public health interventions to reduce maltreatment. Measurement of child maltreatment must overcome numerous methodological challenges. Little is known to date about the extent, nature and methodological quality of these national studies. This study aimed to systematically review the most comprehensive national studies of the prevalence of child maltreatment, and critically appraise their methodologies to help inform the design of future studies. Methods: Guided by PRISMA and following a published protocol, we searched 22 databases from inception to 31 May 2019 to identify nationwide studies of the prevalence of either all five or at least four forms of child maltreatment. We conducted a formal quality assessment and critical analysis of study design. Results: This review identified 30 national prevalence studies of all five or at least four forms of child maltreatment, in 22 countries. While sound approaches are available for different settings, methodologies varied widely in nature and robustness. Some instruments are more reliable and obtain more detailed and useful information about the characteristics of the maltreatment, including its nature, frequency, and the relationship between the child and the person who inflicted the maltreatment. Almost all studies had limitations, especially in the level of detail captured about maltreatment, and the adequacy of constructs of maltreatment types. Conclusions: Countries must invest in rigorous national studies of the prevalence of child maltreatment. Studies should use a sound instrument containing appropriate maltreatment constructs, and obtain nuanced information about its nature.

Suggested Citation

  • Ben Mathews & Rosana Pacella & Michael P Dunne & Marko Simunovic & Cicely Marston, 2020. "Improving measurement of child abuse and neglect: A systematic review and analysis of national prevalence studies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-22, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0227884
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227884
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0227884
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0227884&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0227884?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fadzilah Hanum Mohd Mydin & Christopher Mikton & Wan Yuen Choo & Ranita Hisham Shunmugam & Aja Murray & Yongjie Yon & Raudah M. Yunus & Noran N. Hairi & Farizah M. Hairi & Marie Beaulieu & Amanda Phel, 2024. "Psychometric properties of instruments for measuring abuse of older people in community and institutional settings: A systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(3), September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0227884. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.