IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0225427.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sample size issues in multilevel logistic regression models

Author

Listed:
  • Amjad Ali
  • Sabz Ali
  • Sajjad Ahmad Khan
  • Dost Muhammad Khan
  • Kamran Abbas
  • Alamgir Khalil
  • Sadaf Manzoor
  • Umair Khalil

Abstract

Educational researchers, psychologists, social, epidemiological and medical scientists are often dealing with multilevel data. Sometimes, the response variable in multilevel data is categorical in nature and needs to be analyzed through Multilevel Logistic Regression Models. The main theme of this paper is to provide guidelines for the analysts to select an appropriate sample size while fitting multilevel logistic regression models for different threshold parameters and different estimation methods. Simulation studies have been performed to obtain optimum sample size for Penalized Quasi-likelihood (PQL) and Maximum Likelihood (ML) Methods of estimation. Our results suggest that Maximum Likelihood Method performs better than Penalized Quasi-likelihood Method and requires relatively small sample under chosen conditions. To achieve sufficient accuracy of fixed and random effects under ML method, we established ‘‘50/50” and ‘‘120/50” rule respectively. On the basis our findings, a ‘‘50/60” and ‘‘120/70” rules under PQL method of estimation have also been recommended.

Suggested Citation

  • Amjad Ali & Sabz Ali & Sajjad Ahmad Khan & Dost Muhammad Khan & Kamran Abbas & Alamgir Khalil & Sadaf Manzoor & Umair Khalil, 2019. "Sample size issues in multilevel logistic regression models," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(11), pages 1-13, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0225427
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225427
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0225427
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0225427&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0225427?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sabz Ali & Said Ali Shah & Seema Zubair & Sundas Hussain, 2021. "A comparative study of estimators in multilevel linear models," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(11), pages 1-10, November.
    2. Ákos Bodor & Zoltán Grünhut & Dávid Erát & Márk Hegedüs, 2023. "Reconsidering the Empirical Measurement of Trust towards Unknown Others," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-18, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0225427. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.