IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0216222.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mendelian randomization evaluation of causal effects of fibrinogen on incident coronary heart disease

Author

Listed:
  • Cavin K Ward-Caviness
  • Paul S de Vries
  • Kerri L Wiggins
  • Jennifer E Huffman
  • Lisa R Yanek
  • Lawrence F Bielak
  • Franco Giulianini
  • Xiuqing Guo
  • Marcus E Kleber
  • Tim Kacprowski
  • Stefan Groß
  • Astrid Petersman
  • George Davey Smith
  • Fernando P Hartwig
  • Jack Bowden
  • Gibran Hemani
  • Martina Müller-Nuraysid
  • Konstantin Strauch
  • Wolfgang Koenig
  • Melanie Waldenberger
  • Thomas Meitinger
  • Nathan Pankratz
  • Eric Boerwinkle
  • Weihong Tang
  • Yi-Ping Fu
  • Andrew D Johnson
  • Ci Song
  • Moniek P M de Maat
  • André G Uitterlinden
  • Oscar H Franco
  • Jennifer A Brody
  • Barbara McKnight
  • Yii-Der Ida Chen
  • Bruce M Psaty
  • Rasika A Mathias
  • Diane M Becker
  • Patricia A Peyser
  • Jennifer A Smith
  • Suzette J Bielinski
  • Paul M Ridker
  • Kent D Taylor
  • Jie Yao
  • Russell Tracy
  • Graciela Delgado
  • Stella Trompet
  • Naveed Sattar
  • J Wouter Jukema
  • Lewis C Becker
  • Sharon L R Kardia
  • Jerome I Rotter
  • Winfried März
  • Marcus Dörr
  • Daniel I Chasman
  • Abbas Dehghan
  • Christopher J O’Donnell
  • Nicholas L Smith
  • Annette Peters
  • Alanna C Morrison

Abstract

Background: Fibrinogen is an essential hemostatic factor and cardiovascular disease risk factor. Early attempts at evaluating the causal effect of fibrinogen on coronary heart disease (CHD) and myocardial infraction (MI) using Mendelian randomization (MR) used single variant approaches, and did not take advantage of recent genome-wide association studies (GWAS) or multi-variant, pleiotropy robust MR methodologies. Methods and findings: We evaluated evidence for a causal effect of fibrinogen on both CHD and MI using MR. We used both an allele score approach and pleiotropy robust MR models. The allele score was composed of 38 fibrinogen-associated variants from recent GWAS. Initial analyses using the allele score used a meta-analysis of 11 European-ancestry prospective cohorts, free of CHD and MI at baseline, to examine incidence CHD and MI. We also applied 2 sample MR methods with data from a prevalent CHD and MI GWAS. Results are given in terms of the hazard ratio (HR) or odds ratio (OR), depending on the study design, and associated 95% confidence interval (CI). Conclusions: A small causal effect of fibrinogen on CHD is observed using multi-variant MR approaches which account for pleiotropy, but not single variant MR approaches. Taken together, results indicate that even with large sample sizes and multi-variant approaches MR analyses still cannot exclude the null when estimating the causal effect of fibrinogen on CHD, but that any potential causal effect is likely to be much smaller than observed in epidemiological studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Cavin K Ward-Caviness & Paul S de Vries & Kerri L Wiggins & Jennifer E Huffman & Lisa R Yanek & Lawrence F Bielak & Franco Giulianini & Xiuqing Guo & Marcus E Kleber & Tim Kacprowski & Stefan Groß & A, 2019. "Mendelian randomization evaluation of causal effects of fibrinogen on incident coronary heart disease," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(5), pages 1-18, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0216222
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216222
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0216222
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0216222&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0216222?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Viechtbauer, Wolfgang, 2010. "Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 36(i03).
    2. Bryan N Howie & Peter Donnelly & Jonathan Marchini, 2009. "A Flexible and Accurate Genotype Imputation Method for the Next Generation of Genome-Wide Association Studies," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(6), pages 1-15, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wei-Yu Lin & Ian W Brock & Dan Connley & Helen Cramp & Rachel Tucker & Jon Slate & Malcolm W R Reed & Sabapathy P Balasubramanian & Lisa A Cannon-Albright & Nicola J Camp & Angela Cox, 2013. "Associations of ATR and CHEK1 Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms with Breast Cancer," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(7), pages 1-1, July.
    2. Whitney S Beck & Ed K Hall, 2018. "Confounding factors in algal phosphorus limitation experiments," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-19, October.
    3. Xindong Xue & W. Robert Reed & Robbie C.M. van Aert, 2022. "Social Capital and Economic Growth: A Meta-Analysis," Working Papers in Economics 22/20, University of Canterbury, Department of Economics and Finance.
    4. Bart Verkuil & Serpil Atasayi & Marc L Molendijk, 2015. "Workplace Bullying and Mental Health: A Meta-Analysis on Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(8), pages 1-16, August.
    5. Francesca Pilotto & Ingolf Kühn & Rita Adrian & Renate Alber & Audrey Alignier & Christopher Andrews & Jaana Bäck & Luc Barbaro & Deborah Beaumont & Natalie Beenaerts & Sue Benham & David S. Boukal & , 2020. "Meta-analysis of multidecadal biodiversity trends in Europe," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, December.
    6. Daniel Svensson & Matilda Rentoft & Anna M Dahlin & Emma Lundholm & Pall I Olason & Andreas Sjödin & Carin Nylander & Beatrice S Melin & Johan Trygg & Erik Johansson, 2020. "A whole-genome sequenced control population in northern Sweden reveals subregional genetic differences," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(9), pages 1-18, September.
    7. repec:cup:judgdm:v:15:y:2020:i:6:p:972-988 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Chuan Gao & Nan Wang & Xiuqing Guo & Julie T Ziegler & Kent D Taylor & Anny H Xiang & Yang Hai & Steven J Kridel & Jerry L Nadler & Fouad Kandeel & Leslie J Raffel & Yii-Der I Chen & Jill M Norris & J, 2015. "A Comprehensive Analysis of Common and Rare Variants to Identify Adiposity Loci in Hispanic Americans: The IRAS Family Study (IRASFS)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(11), pages 1-17, November.
    9. Jonas Schmidt & Tammo H. A. Bijmolt, 2020. "Accurately measuring willingness to pay for consumer goods: a meta-analysis of the hypothetical bias," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 499-518, May.
    10. Mario Herberz & Tobias Brosch & Ulf J. J. Hahnel, 2020. "Kilo what? Default units increase value sensitivity in joint evaluations of energy efficiency," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 15(6), pages 972-988, November.
    11. Piers Steel & Sjoerd Beugelsdijk & Herman Aguinis, 2021. "The anatomy of an award-winning meta-analysis: Recommendations for authors, reviewers, and readers of meta-analytic reviews," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 52(1), pages 23-44, February.
    12. Molo, Fabio & Pawel, Samuel & Fraga González, Gorka, 2024. "A Robustness Reproduction of "A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 90 Cohort Studies of Social Isolation, Loneliness and Mortality"," I4R Discussion Paper Series 169, The Institute for Replication (I4R).
    13. Augusteijn, Hilde Elisabeth Maria & van Aert, Robbie Cornelis Maria & van Assen, Marcel A. L. M., 2021. "Posterior Probabilities of Effect Sizes and Heterogeneity in Meta-Analysis: An Intuitive Approach of Dealing with Publication Bias," OSF Preprints avkgj, Center for Open Science.
    14. Georgiou, George K. & Guo, Kan & Naveenkumar, Nithya & Vieira, Ana Paula Alves & Das, J.P., 2020. "PASS theory of intelligence and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    15. Geller, Susann & Wilhelm, Oliver & Wacker, Jan & Hamm, Alfons & Hildebrandt, Andrea, 2017. "Associations of the COMT Val158Met polymorphism with working memory and intelligence – A review and meta-analysis," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 75-92.
    16. Gignac, Gilles E. & Bates, Timothy C., 2017. "Brain volume and intelligence: The moderating role of intelligence measurement quality," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 18-29.
    17. Stephan Kambach & Ingolf Kühn & Bastien Castagneyrol & Helge Bruelheide, 2016. "The Impact of Tree Diversity on Different Aspects of Insect Herbivory along a Global Temperature Gradient - A Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(11), pages 1-14, November.
    18. Julian Packheiser & Helena Hartmann & Kelly Fredriksen & Valeria Gazzola & Christian Keysers & Frédéric Michon, 2024. "A systematic review and multivariate meta-analysis of the physical and mental health benefits of touch interventions," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 8(6), pages 1088-1107, June.
    19. Nan Wang & Yuxiang Luan & Rui Ma, 2024. "Detecting causal relationships between work motivation and job performance: a meta-analytic review of cross-lagged studies," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-10, December.
    20. repec:cup:judgdm:v:14:y:2019:i:3:p:234-279 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Senlin Zhou & Yunpeng Wu & Xizheng Xu, 2023. "Linking Cognitive Reappraisal and Expressive Suppression to Mindfulness: A Three-Level Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-16, January.
    22. Mahesh Shumsher Rughooputh & Rui Zeng & Ying Yao, 2015. "Protein Diet Restriction Slows Chronic Kidney Disease Progression in Non-Diabetic and in Type 1 Diabetic Patients, but Not in Type 2 Diabetic Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials ," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(12), pages 1-17, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0216222. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.