IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0207749.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Machine learning model combining features from algorithms with different analytical methodologies to detect laboratory-event-related adverse drug reaction signals

Author

Listed:
  • Eugene Jeong
  • Namgi Park
  • Young Choi
  • Rae Woong Park
  • Dukyong Yoon

Abstract

Background: The importance of identifying and evaluating adverse drug reactions (ADRs) has been widely recognized. Many studies have developed algorithms for ADR signal detection using electronic health record (EHR) data. In this study, we propose a machine learning (ML) model that enables accurate ADR signal detection by integrating features from existing algorithms based on inpatient EHR laboratory results. Materials and methods: To construct an ADR reference dataset, we extracted known drug–laboratory event pairs represented by a laboratory test from the EU-SPC and SIDER databases. All possible drug–laboratory event pairs, except known ones, are considered unknown. To detect a known drug–laboratory event pair, three existing algorithms—CERT, CLEAR, and PACE—were applied to 21-year inpatient EHR data. We also constructed ML models (based on random forest, L1 regularized logistic regression, support vector machine, and a neural network) that use the intermediate products of the CERT, CLEAR, and PACE algorithms as inputs and determine whether a drug–laboratory event pair is associated. For performance comparison, we evaluated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), F1-measure, and area under receiver operating characteristic (AUROC). Results: All measures of ML models outperformed those of existing algorithms with sensitivity of 0.593–0.793, specificity of 0.619–0.796, NPV of 0.645–0.727, PPV of 0.680–0.777, F1-measure of 0.629–0.709, and AUROC of 0.737–0.816. Features related to change or distribution of shape were considered important for detecting ADR signals. Conclusions: Improved performance of ML models indicated that applying our model to EHR data is feasible and promising for detecting more accurate and comprehensive ADR signals.

Suggested Citation

  • Eugene Jeong & Namgi Park & Young Choi & Rae Woong Park & Dukyong Yoon, 2018. "Machine learning model combining features from algorithms with different analytical methodologies to detect laboratory-event-related adverse drug reaction signals," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(11), pages 1-15, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0207749
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207749
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0207749
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0207749&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0207749?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David Thesmar & David Sraer & Lisa Pinheiro & Nick Dadson & Razvan Veliche & Paul Greenberg, 2019. "Combining the Power of Artificial Intelligence with the Richness of Healthcare Claims Data: Opportunities and Challenges," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, vol. 37(6), pages 745-752, June.
    2. Cedric Kuang, 2019. "Insight of Artificial Intelligence Application in Healthcare," International Journal of Sciences, Office ijSciences, vol. 8(08), pages 50-55, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0207749. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.