IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0202769.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of participatory teaching methods on medical students’ perception of their abilities and knowledge of epidemiology and statistics

Author

Listed:
  • Margarita Rubio
  • María Sánchez-Ronco
  • Rosa Mohedano
  • Asunción Hernando

Abstract

Statistics and Epidemiology are crucial both in clinical decision-making and clinical research. Teaching these disciplines in a Bachelor’s Degree in Medicine is a significant challenge. In this paper, we aim to describe two participatory teaching methods used in a yearlong second-year course that includes both Epidemiology and Statistics, and to analyze how these two methodologies affect the students’ perception of the course and their abilities related to these subjects. Both methodologies consist in carrying out a specific practical activity. The first practical activity is carried out using a website and aims to help students understand concepts and interpret information; the second involves analyzing a database using a statistical package and, subsequently, producing a scientific report. In addition, we prepared a questionnaire to find out the students’ perception of these issues. The nine questionnaire items were assessed using a rating scale and adapted to characteristics of the course, which covers Epidemiology and Statistics in an integrated manner. Then we assessed the differences in perception before and after the activities were carried out. The results show that the students’ perception improved significantly in the following items: “importance of Statistics and Epidemiology in Medicine”; “usefulness in clinical practice”; “understanding concepts”; “ability to perform a statistical analysis”; and “ability to sort data”. The difference was not significant in the remaining four items. In conclusion, the students’ perception of their ability in Statistics and Epidemiology significantly improved after completing the practical activities, and their perception of importance and usefulness of these subjects also improved.

Suggested Citation

  • Margarita Rubio & María Sánchez-Ronco & Rosa Mohedano & Asunción Hernando, 2018. "The impact of participatory teaching methods on medical students’ perception of their abilities and knowledge of epidemiology and statistics," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-12, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0202769
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202769
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0202769
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0202769&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0202769?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dejana Stanisavljevic & Goran Trajkovic & Jelena Marinkovic & Zoran Bukumiric & Andja Cirkovic & Natasa Milic, 2014. "Assessing Attitudes towards Statistics among Medical Students: Psychometric Properties of the Serbian Version of the Survey of Attitudes Towards Statistics (SATS)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(11), pages 1-7, November.
    2. Natasa M Milic & Srdjan Masic & Jelena Milin-Lazovic & Goran Trajkovic & Zoran Bukumiric & Marko Savic & Nikola V Milic & Andja Cirkovic & Milan Gajic & Mirjana Kostic & Aleksandra Ilic & Dejana Stani, 2016. "The Importance of Medical Students' Attitudes Regarding Cognitive Competence for Teaching Applied Statistics: Multi-Site Study and Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(10), pages 1-13, October.
    3. Tracey L Weissgerber & Vesna D Garovic & Jelena S Milin-Lazovic & Stacey J Winham & Zoran Obradovic & Jerome P Trzeciakowski & Natasa M Milic, 2016. "Reinventing Biostatistics Education for Basic Scientists," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(4), pages 1-12, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yousef Elfanagely & Joshua Ray Tanzer & Ricardo Pulido & Hanin Rashid & Liesel Copeland, 2020. "How curricular changes influence medical students’ perceptions of basic science: A pilot study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-10, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tracey L Weissgerber, 2021. "Learning from the past to develop data analysis curricula for the future," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(7), pages 1-3, July.
    2. Natasa M Milic & Srdjan Masic & Jelena Milin-Lazovic & Goran Trajkovic & Zoran Bukumiric & Marko Savic & Nikola V Milic & Andja Cirkovic & Milan Gajic & Mirjana Kostic & Aleksandra Ilic & Dejana Stani, 2016. "The Importance of Medical Students' Attitudes Regarding Cognitive Competence for Teaching Applied Statistics: Multi-Site Study and Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(10), pages 1-13, October.
    3. Heidi Spratt & Erin E. Fox & Nawar Shara & Madhu Mazumdar, 2017. "Strategies for Success: Early-Stage Collaborating Biostatistics Faculty in an Academic Health Center," The American Statistician, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 71(3), pages 220-230, July.
    4. Wei Zhuang & Luísa Camacho & Camila S Silva & Michael Thomson & Kevin Snyder, 2022. "A robust biostatistical method leverages informative but uncertainly determined qPCR data for biomarker detection, early diagnosis, and treatment," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(1), pages 1-29, January.
    5. Cladera, Magdalena, 2021. "Assessing the attitudes of economics students towards econometrics," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 37(C).
    6. Tracey L Weissgerber & Vesna D Garovic & Jelena S Milin-Lazovic & Stacey J Winham & Zoran Obradovic & Jerome P Trzeciakowski & Natasa M Milic, 2016. "Reinventing Biostatistics Education for Basic Scientists," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(4), pages 1-12, April.
    7. Esma Emmioglu Sarikaya & Ahmet Ok & Yesim Capa Aydin & Candace Schau, 2018. "Turkish version of the Survey of Attitudes toward Statistics: Factorial Structure Invariance by Gender," International Journal of Higher Education, Sciedu Press, vol. 7(2), pages 121-121, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0202769. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.