IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0199604.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Groove in drum patterns as a function of both rhythmic properties and listeners’ attitudes

Author

Listed:
  • Olivier Senn
  • Lorenz Kilchenmann
  • Toni Bechtold
  • Florian Hoesl

Abstract

Music psychology defines groove as humans’ pleasureable urge to move their body in synchrony with music. Past research has found that rhythmic syncopation, event density, beat salience, and rhythmic variability are positively associated with groove. This exploratory study investigates the groove effect of 248 reconstructed drum patterns from different popular music styles (pop, rock, funk, heavy metal, rock’n’roll, hip hop, soul, R&B). It aims at identifying factors that might be relevant for groove and worth investigating in a controlled setting in the future. Drum patterns of eight bars duration, chosen from 248 popular music tracks, have been transcribed and audio reconstructions have been created on the basis of sound samples. During an online listening experiment, 665 participants rated the reconstructions a total of 8,329 times using a groove questionnaire. Results show that, among 15 tested variables, syncopation (R2 = 0.010) and event density (R2 = 0.011) were positively associated with the groove ratings. These effects were stronger in participants who were music professionals, compared to amateur musicians or mere listeners. A categorisation of the stimuli according to structural aspects was also associated with groove (R2 = 0.018). Beat salience, residual microtiming and rhythmic variability showed no effect on the groove ratings. Participants’ familiarity with a drum pattern had a positive influence on the groove ratings (η2 = 0.051). The largest isolated effect was measured for participants’ style bias (R2 = 0.123): groove ratings tended to be high if participants had the impression that the drum pattern belonged to a style they liked. Combined, the effects of style bias and familiarity (R2 = 0.152) exceeded the other effects as predictors for groove by a wide margin. We conclude that listeners’ taste, musical biographies and expertise have a strong effect on their groove experience. This motivates groove research not to focus on the music alone, but to take the listeners into account as well.

Suggested Citation

  • Olivier Senn & Lorenz Kilchenmann & Toni Bechtold & Florian Hoesl, 2018. "Groove in drum patterns as a function of both rhythmic properties and listeners’ attitudes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(6), pages 1-33, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0199604
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199604
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0199604
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0199604&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0199604?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maria A G Witek & Eric F Clarke & Mikkel Wallentin & Morten L Kringelbach & Peter Vuust, 2014. "Syncopation, Body-Movement and Pleasure in Groove Music," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(4), pages 1-12, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tomas E Matthews & Maria A G Witek & Ole A Heggli & Virginia B Penhune & Peter Vuust, 2019. "The sensation of groove is affected by the interaction of rhythmic and harmonic complexity," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brian C Wesolowski & Alex Hofmann, 2016. "There’s More to Groove than Bass in Electronic Dance Music: Why Some People Won’t Dance to Techno," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(10), pages 1-23, October.
    2. Tomas E Matthews & Maria A G Witek & Ole A Heggli & Virginia B Penhune & Peter Vuust, 2019. "The sensation of groove is affected by the interaction of rhythmic and harmonic complexity," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, January.
    3. Jonah Katz & Emmanuel Chemla & Christophe Pallier, 2015. "An Attentional Effect of Musical Metrical Structure," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(11), pages 1-14, November.
    4. Martin Alejandro Miguel & Mariano Sigman & Diego Fernandez Slezak, 2020. "From beat tracking to beat expectation: Cognitive-based beat tracking for capturing pulse clarity through time," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-22, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0199604. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.