IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0188709.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fisher’s exact approach for post hoc analysis of a chi-squared test

Author

Listed:
  • Guogen Shan
  • Shawn Gerstenberger

Abstract

This research is motivated by one of our survey studies to assess the potential influence of introducing zebra mussels to the Lake Mead National Recreation Area, Nevada. One research question in this study is to investigate the association between the boating activity type and the awareness of zebra mussels. A chi-squared test is often used for testing independence between two factors with nominal levels. When the null hypothesis of independence between two factors is rejected, we are often left wondering where does the significance come from. Cell residuals, including standardized residuals and adjusted residuals, are traditionally used in testing for cell significance, which is often known as a post hoc test after a statistically significant chi-squared test. In practice, the limiting distributions of these residuals are utilized for statistical inference. However, they may lead to different conclusions based on the calculated p-values, and their p-values could be over- o6r under-estimated due to the unsatisfactory performance of asymptotic approaches with regards to type I error control. In this article, we propose new exact p-values by using Fisher’s approach based on three commonly used test statistics to order the sample space. We theoretically prove that the proposed new exact p-values based on these test statistics are the same. Based on our extensive simulation studies, we show that the existing asymptotic approach based on adjusted residual is often more likely to reject the null hypothesis as compared to the exact approach due to the inflated family-wise error rates as observed. We would recommend the proposed exact p-value for use in practice as a valuable post hoc analysis technique for chi-squared analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Guogen Shan & Shawn Gerstenberger, 2017. "Fisher’s exact approach for post hoc analysis of a chi-squared test," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(12), pages 1-12, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0188709
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188709
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0188709
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0188709&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0188709?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yosi S. Mutiarni & Hitoshi Nakamura & Yasmin Bhattacharya, 2022. "The Resilient Community: Strengthening People-Centered Disaster Risk Reduction in the Merapi Volcano Community, Java, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-28, February.
    2. Khan, M. Laeeq & Malik, A. & Ruhi, U. & Al-Busaidi, A., 2022. "Conflicting attitudes: Analyzing social media data to understand the early discourse on COVID-19 passports," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    3. Quinn, Edward B. & Ross, Jessica D. & Boston, P. Qasimah & Committee, HEAT Steering & Mulligan, Connie J. & Gravlee, Clarence C., 2023. "The social patterning of vicarious discrimination: Implications for health equity," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 332(C).
    4. Valsesia, Francesca & Nunes, Joseph C. & Ordanini, Andrea, 2021. "I am not talking to you: Partitioning an audience in an attempt to solve the self-promotion dilemma," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 76-89.
    5. Natalie DelRocco & Yipeng Wang & Dongyuan Wu & Yuting Yang & Guogen Shan, 2023. "New Confidence Intervals for Relative Risk of Two Correlated Proportions," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 15(1), pages 1-30, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0188709. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.