IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0187293.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Out-of-pocket payment for surgery in Uganda: The rate of impoverishing and catastrophic expenditure at a government hospital

Author

Listed:
  • Geoffrey A Anderson
  • Lenka Ilcisin
  • Peter Kayima
  • Lenard Abesiga
  • Noralis Portal Benitez
  • Joseph Ngonzi
  • Mayanja Ronald
  • Mark G Shrime

Abstract

Background and objectives: It is Ugandan governmental policy that all surgical care delivered at government hospitals in Uganda is to be provided to patients free of charge. In practice, however, frequent stock-outs and broken equipment require patients to pay for large portions of their care out of their own pocket. The purpose of this study was to determine the financial impact on patients who undergo surgery at a government hospital in Uganda. Methods: Every surgical patient discharged from a surgical ward at a large regional referral hospital in rural southwestern Uganda over a 3-week period in April 2016 was asked to participate. Patients who agreed were surveyed to determine their baseline level of poverty and to assess the financial impact of the hospitalization. Rates of impoverishment and catastrophic expenditure were then calculated. An “impoverishing expense” is defined as one that pushes a household below published poverty thresholds. A “catastrophic expense” was incurred if the patient spent more than 10% of their average annual expenditures. Results: We interviewed 295 out of a possible 320 patients during the study period. 46% (CI 40–52%) of our patients met the World Bank’s definition of extreme poverty ($1.90/person/day). After receiving surgical care an additional 10 patients faced extreme poverty, and 5 patients were newly impoverished by the World Bank’s definition ($3.10/person/day). 31% of patients faced a catastrophic expenditure of more than 10% of their estimated total yearly expenses. 53% of the households in our study had to borrow money to pay for care, 21% had to sell possessions, and 17% lost a job as a result of the patient’s hospitalization. Only 5% of our patients received some form of charity. Conclusions and relevance: Despite the government’s policy to provide “free care,” undergoing an operation at a government hospital in Uganda can result in a severe economic burden to patients and their families. Alternative financing schemes to provide financial protection are critically needed.

Suggested Citation

  • Geoffrey A Anderson & Lenka Ilcisin & Peter Kayima & Lenard Abesiga & Noralis Portal Benitez & Joseph Ngonzi & Mayanja Ronald & Mark G Shrime, 2017. "Out-of-pocket payment for surgery in Uganda: The rate of impoverishing and catastrophic expenditure at a government hospital," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(10), pages 1-13, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0187293
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187293
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0187293
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0187293&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0187293?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Manu Raj & Mary Paul & Abish Sudhakar & Anu Alphonse Varghese & Aareesh Chittulliparamb Haridas & Conrad Kabali & Raman Krishna Kumar, 2015. "Micro-Economic Impact of Congenital Heart Surgery: Results of a Prospective Study from a Limited-Resource Setting," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-13, June.
    2. World Bank & International Monetary Fund, 2016. "Global Monitoring Report 2015/2016," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 22547.
    3. Nguyen, Kim Thuy & Hai Khuat, Oanh Thi & Ma, Shuangge & Pham, Duc Cuong & Hong Khuat, Giang Thi & Ruger, Jennifer Prah, 2012. "Coping with health care expenses among poor households: Evidence from a rural commune in Vietnam," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(5), pages 724-733.
    4. Shankar Prinja & Pankaj Bahuguna & Rakesh Gupta & Atul Sharma & Saroj Kumar Rana & Rajesh Kumar, 2015. "Coverage and Financial Risk Protection for Institutional Delivery: How Universal Is Provision of Maternal Health Care in India?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(9), pages 1-15, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anshul Kastor & Sanjay K Mohanty, 2018. "Disease-specific out-of-pocket and catastrophic health expenditure on hospitalization in India: Do Indian households face distress health financing?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(5), pages 1-18, May.
    2. Rinshu Dwivedi & Jalandhar Pradhan & Ramesh Athe, 2021. "Measuring catastrophe in paying for healthcare: A comparative methodological approach by using National Sample Survey, India," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(5), pages 1887-1915, September.
    3. Gibson Meira Oliveira & André Gustavo Carvalho Machado, 2017. "Dynamic of Innovation in Services for Consumers at the Bottom of the Pyramid," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 14(6), pages 609-623, November.
    4. Ahmed, S. Amer & Vargas Da Cruz,Marcio Jose & Quillin,Bryce Ramsey & Schellekens,Philip, 2016. "Demographic change and development : a global typology," Policy Research Working Paper Series 7893, The World Bank.
    5. Navid Khan & Ke Xing & Salman Mahmood & Riaz Ahmad, 2024. "Key underlying concepts of shared prosperity: insights from a literature review," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 71(3), pages 727-751, September.
    6. Simone Schaner, 2018. "The Persistent Power of Behavioral Change: Long-Run Impacts of Temporary Savings Subsidies for the Poor," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 10(3), pages 67-100, July.
    7. Madhu Gupta & Federica Angeli & Hans Bosma & Monica Rana & Shankar Prinja & Rajesh Kumar & Onno C P van Schayck, 2016. "Effectiveness of Multiple-Strategy Community Intervention in Reducing Geographical, Socioeconomic and Gender Based Inequalities in Maternal and Child Health Outcomes in Haryana, India," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-13, March.
    8. Anupa Rijal & Tara Ballav Adhikari & Jahangir A M Khan & Gabriele Berg-Beckhoff, 2018. "The economic impact of non-communicable diseases among households in South Asia and their coping strategy: A systematic review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(11), pages 1-23, November.
    9. Cruz, Marcio & Ahmed, S. Amer, 2018. "On the impact of demographic change on economic growth and poverty," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 95-106.
    10. Shankar Prinja & Pankaj Bahuguna & Indrani Gupta & Samik Chowdhury & Mayur Trivedi, 2019. "Role of insurance in determining utilization of healthcare and financial risk protection in India," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(2), pages 1-16, February.
    11. Nhan, Nguyen Thanh, 2021. "Healthcare expenses for poor households, how can large- scale poverty reduction programs help?," OSF Preprints 8m9ea, Center for Open Science.
    12. Agnieszka Majewska & Urszula Gierałtowska, 2022. "Impact of Economic Affluence on CO 2 Emissions in CEE Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-21, January.
    13. Tony Addison, 2015. "Thirty years in Africa's development: From structural adjustment to structural transformation?," WIDER Working Paper Series 119, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    14. Vo, Thang T. & Van, Pham Hoang, 2019. "Can health insurance reduce household vulnerability? Evidence from Viet Nam," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 1-1.
    15. Anand, Sudhir & Segal, Paul, 2017. "Who Are the Global Top 1%?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 111-126.
    16. Francisco H. G. Ferreira & Shaohua Chen & Andrew Dabalen & Yuri Dikhanov & Nada Hamadeh & Dean Jolliffe & Ambar Narayan & Espen Beer Prydz & Ana Revenga & Prem Sangraula & Umar Serajuddin & Nobuo Yosh, 2016. "A global count of the extreme poor in 2012: data issues, methodology and initial results," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 14(2), pages 141-172, June.
    17. Masako Hasegawa, 2017. "Risk-Coping Measures against Health Shocks during the Process of Penetration of Health Insurance in Vietnam," Asian Economic Journal, East Asian Economic Association, vol. 31(2), pages 139-164, June.
    18. Andy Sumner, 2016. "The world's two new middles Growth, precarity, structural change, and the limitations of the special case," WIDER Working Paper Series 034, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    19. Nugroho, Anda & Amir, Hidayat & Maududy, Irsyan & Marlina, Irma, 2021. "Poverty eradication programs in Indonesia: Progress, challenges and reforms," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 43(6), pages 1204-1224.
    20. Amita Majumder & Ranjan Ray & Sattwik Santra, 2016. "Global and Country Poverty Rates, Welfare Rankings of the Regions and Purchasing Power Parities: How Robust Are the Results?," Monash Economics Working Papers 11-16, Monash University, Department of Economics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0187293. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.