IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0184197.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Diffusion weighted imaging in patients with rectal cancer: Comparison between Gaussian and non-Gaussian models

Author

Listed:
  • Georgios C Manikis
  • Kostas Marias
  • Doenja M J Lambregts
  • Katerina Nikiforaki
  • Miriam M van Heeswijk
  • Frans C H Bakers
  • Regina G H Beets-Tan
  • Nikolaos Papanikolaou

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of four diffusion models, including mono and bi-exponential both Gaussian and non-Gaussian models, in diffusion weighted imaging of rectal cancer. Material and methods: Nineteen patients with rectal adenocarcinoma underwent MRI examination of the rectum before chemoradiation therapy including a 7 b-value diffusion sequence (0, 25, 50, 100, 500, 1000 and 2000 s/mm2) at a 1.5T scanner. Four different diffusion models including mono- and bi-exponential Gaussian (MG and BG) and non-Gaussian (MNG and BNG) were applied on whole tumor volumes of interest. Two different statistical criteria were recruited to assess their fitting performance, including the adjusted-R2 and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE). To decide which model better characterizes rectal cancer, model selection was relied on Akaike Information Criteria (AIC) and F-ratio. Results: All candidate models achieved a good fitting performance with the two most complex models, the BG and the BNG, exhibiting the best fitting performance. However, both criteria for model selection indicated that the MG model performed better than any other model. In particular, using AIC Weights and F-ratio, the pixel-based analysis demonstrated that tumor areas better described by the simplest MG model in an average area of 53% and 33%, respectively. Non-Gaussian behavior was illustrated in an average area of 37% according to the F-ratio, and 7% using AIC Weights. However, the distributions of the pixels best fitted by each of the four models suggest that MG failed to perform better than any other model in all patients, and the overall tumor area. Conclusion: No single diffusion model evaluated herein could accurately describe rectal tumours. These findings probably can be explained on the basis of increased tumour heterogeneity, where areas with high vascularity could be fitted better with bi-exponential models, and areas with necrosis would mostly follow mono-exponential behavior.

Suggested Citation

  • Georgios C Manikis & Kostas Marias & Doenja M J Lambregts & Katerina Nikiforaki & Miriam M van Heeswijk & Frans C H Bakers & Regina G H Beets-Tan & Nikolaos Papanikolaou, 2017. "Diffusion weighted imaging in patients with rectal cancer: Comparison between Gaussian and non-Gaussian models," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(9), pages 1-15, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0184197
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184197
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0184197
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0184197&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0184197?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Farida Grinberg & Ezequiel Farrher & Luisa Ciobanu & Françoise Geffroy & Denis Le Bihan & N Jon Shah, 2014. "Non-Gaussian Diffusion Imaging for Enhanced Contrast of Brain Tissue Affected by Ischemic Stroke," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(2), pages 1-15, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guoxing Lin, 2018. "Analysis of PFG Anomalous Diffusion via Real-Space and Phase-Space Approaches," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-16, January.
    2. Lin, Guoxing, 2017. "Analyzing signal attenuation in PFG anomalous diffusion via a modified Gaussian phase distribution approximation based on fractal derivative model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 467(C), pages 277-288.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0184197. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.