IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0089225.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Non-Gaussian Diffusion Imaging for Enhanced Contrast of Brain Tissue Affected by Ischemic Stroke

Author

Listed:
  • Farida Grinberg
  • Ezequiel Farrher
  • Luisa Ciobanu
  • Françoise Geffroy
  • Denis Le Bihan
  • N Jon Shah

Abstract

Recent diffusion MRI studies of stroke in humans and animals have shown that the quantitative parameters characterising the degree of non-Gaussianity of the diffusion process are much more sensitive to ischemic changes than the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) considered so far as the “gold standard”. The observed changes exceeded that of the ADC by a remarkable factor of 2 to 3. These studies were based on the novel non-Gaussian methods, such as diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) and log-normal distribution function imaging (LNDFI). As shown in our previous work investigating the animal stroke model, a combined analysis using two methods, DKI and LNDFI provides valuable complimentary information. In the present work, we report the application of three non-Gaussian diffusion models to quantify the deviations from the Gaussian behaviour in stroke induced by transient middle cerebral artery occlusion in rat brains: the gamma-distribution function (GDF), the stretched exponential model (SEM), and the biexponential model. The main goal was to compare the sensitivity of various non-Gaussian metrics to ischemic changes and to investigate if a combined application of several models will provide added value in the assessment of stroke. We have shown that two models, GDF and SEM, exhibit a better performance than the conventional method and allow for a significantly enhanced visualization of lesions. Furthermore, we showed that valuable information regarding spatial properties of stroke lesions can be obtained. In particular, we observed a stratified cortex structure in the lesions that were well visible in the maps of the GDF and SEM metrics, but poorly distinguishable in the ADC-maps. Our results provided evidence that cortical layers tend to be differently affected by ischemic processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Farida Grinberg & Ezequiel Farrher & Luisa Ciobanu & Françoise Geffroy & Denis Le Bihan & N Jon Shah, 2014. "Non-Gaussian Diffusion Imaging for Enhanced Contrast of Brain Tissue Affected by Ischemic Stroke," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(2), pages 1-15, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0089225
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089225
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0089225
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0089225&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0089225?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Georgios C Manikis & Kostas Marias & Doenja M J Lambregts & Katerina Nikiforaki & Miriam M van Heeswijk & Frans C H Bakers & Regina G H Beets-Tan & Nikolaos Papanikolaou, 2017. "Diffusion weighted imaging in patients with rectal cancer: Comparison between Gaussian and non-Gaussian models," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(9), pages 1-15, September.
    2. Lin, Guoxing, 2017. "Analyzing signal attenuation in PFG anomalous diffusion via a modified Gaussian phase distribution approximation based on fractal derivative model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 467(C), pages 277-288.
    3. Guoxing Lin, 2018. "Analysis of PFG Anomalous Diffusion via Real-Space and Phase-Space Approaches," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-16, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0089225. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.