Author
Listed:
- Offer Erez
- Roberto Romero
- Eli Maymon
- Piya Chaemsaithong
- Bogdan Done
- Percy Pacora
- Bogdan Panaitescu
- Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa
- Sonia S Hassan
- Adi L Tarca
Abstract
Background: Late-onset preeclampsia is the most prevalent phenotype of this syndrome; nevertheless, only a few biomarkers for its early diagnosis have been reported. We sought to correct this deficiency using a high through-put proteomic platform. Methods: A case-control longitudinal study was conducted, including 90 patients with normal pregnancies and 76 patients with late-onset preeclampsia (diagnosed at ≥34 weeks of gestation). Maternal plasma samples were collected throughout gestation (normal pregnancy: 2–6 samples per patient, median of 2; late-onset preeclampsia: 2–6, median of 5). The abundance of 1,125 proteins was measured using an aptamers-based proteomics technique. Protein abundance in normal pregnancies was modeled using linear mixed-effects models to estimate mean abundance as a function of gestational age. Data was then expressed as multiples of-the-mean (MoM) values in normal pregnancies. Multi-marker prediction models were built using data from one of five gestational age intervals (8–16, 16.1–22, 22.1–28, 28.1–32, 32.1–36 weeks of gestation). The predictive performance of the best combination of proteins was compared to placental growth factor (PIGF) using bootstrap. Results: 1) At 8–16 weeks of gestation, the best prediction model included only one protein, matrix metalloproteinase 7 (MMP-7), that had a sensitivity of 69% at a false positive rate (FPR) of 20% (AUC = 0.76); 2) at 16.1–22 weeks of gestation, MMP-7 was the single best predictor of late-onset preeclampsia with a sensitivity of 70% at a FPR of 20% (AUC = 0.82); 3) after 22 weeks of gestation, PlGF was the best predictor of late-onset preeclampsia, identifying 1/3 to 1/2 of the patients destined to develop this syndrome (FPR = 20%); 4) 36 proteins were associated with late-onset preeclampsia in at least one interval of gestation (after adjustment for covariates); 5) several biological processes, such as positive regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor signaling pathway, were perturbed; and 6) from 22.1 weeks of gestation onward, the set of proteins most predictive of severe preeclampsia was different from the set most predictive of the mild form of this syndrome. Conclusions: Elevated MMP-7 early in gestation (8–22 weeks) and low PlGF later in gestation (after 22 weeks) are the strongest predictors for the subsequent development of late-onset preeclampsia, suggesting that the optimal identification of patients at risk may involve a two-step diagnostic process.
Suggested Citation
Offer Erez & Roberto Romero & Eli Maymon & Piya Chaemsaithong & Bogdan Done & Percy Pacora & Bogdan Panaitescu & Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa & Sonia S Hassan & Adi L Tarca, 2017.
"The prediction of late-onset preeclampsia: Results from a longitudinal proteomics study,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(7), pages 1-28, July.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0181468
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181468
Download full text from publisher
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Ayibaota Bahabayi & Nan Yang & Tong Xu & Yuting Xue & Lijuan Ma & Xunke Gu & Yongqing Wang & Keke Jia, 2022.
"Expression of Matrix Metalloproteinase-2,-7,-9 in Serum during Pregnancy in Patients with Pre-Eclampsia: A Prospective Study,"
IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-11, November.
- Adi L Tarca & Roberto Romero & Neta Benshalom-Tirosh & Nandor Gabor Than & Dereje W Gudicha & Bogdan Done & Percy Pacora & Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa & Bogdan Panaitescu & Dan Tirosh & Nardhy Gomez-Lope, 2019.
"The prediction of early preeclampsia: Results from a longitudinal proteomics study,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(6), pages 1-34, June.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0181468. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.