IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0176068.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The relationship between diabetes and colorectal cancer prognosis: A meta-analysis based on the cohort studies

Author

Listed:
  • Bo Zhu
  • Xiaomei Wu
  • Bo Wu
  • Dan Pei
  • Lu Zhang
  • Lixuan Wei

Abstract

Introduction: Though a meta-analysis reported the effect of diabetes on colorectal prognosis in 2013, a series of large-scale long-term cohort studies has comprehensively reported the outcome effect estimates on the relationship between diabetes and colorectal prognosis, and their results were still consistent. Methods: We carried out an extensive search strategy in multiple databases and conducted a meta-analysis on the effect of diabetes on colorectal prognosis, based on the included 36 cohort studies, which contained 2,299,012 subjects. In order to collect more data, besides conventional methods, we used the professional software to extract survival data from the Kaplan-Meier curves, and analyzed both the 5-year survival rate and survival risk in overall survival, cancer-specific survival, cardiovascular disease—specific survival, disease-free survival, and recurrence-free survival, to comprehensively reflect the effect of diabetes on colorectal prognosis. Results: The results found that compared to patients without diabetes, patients with diabetes will have a 5-year shorter survival in colorectal, colon and rectal cancer, with a 18%, 19% and 16% decreased in overall survival respectively. We also found similar results in cancer-specific survival, cardiovascular disease—specific survival, disease-free survival, and recurrence-free survival, but not all these results were significant. We performed the subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis to find the source of heterogeneity. Their results were similar to the overall results. Conclusions: Our meta-analysis suggested that diabetes had a negative effect on colorectal cancer in overall survival. More studies are still needed to confirm the relationship between diabetes and colorectal prognosis in cancer-specific survival, cardiovascular disease—specific survival, disease-free survival, and recurrence-free survival.

Suggested Citation

  • Bo Zhu & Xiaomei Wu & Bo Wu & Dan Pei & Lu Zhang & Lixuan Wei, 2017. "The relationship between diabetes and colorectal cancer prognosis: A meta-analysis based on the cohort studies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(4), pages 1-20, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0176068
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176068
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0176068
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0176068&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0176068?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xinyuan Li & Lijun Zhu & Yingying Su & Shaokuan Fang, 2017. "Short-term efficacy and tolerability of venlafaxine extended release in adults with generalized anxiety disorder without depression: A meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(10), pages 1-14, October.
    2. Xinyuan Li & Lijun Zhu & Chunkui Zhou & Jing Liu & Heqian Du & Chenglin Wang & Shaokuan Fang, 2018. "Efficacy and tolerability of short-term duloxetine treatment in adults with generalized anxiety disorder: A meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(3), pages 1-15, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0176068. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.