Author
Listed:
- Julia Krämer
- Jan-Gerd Tenberge
- Ingo Kleiter
- Wolfgang Gaissmaier
- Tobias Ruck
- Christoph Heesen
- Sven G Meuth
Abstract
Background: Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) is one of the major risks of natalizumab therapy. Despite introduction of the currently employed PML risk stratification algorithm, the incidence of natalizumab-associated PML cases is not decreasing. Objectives: We addressed the following questions: How do natalizumab-treated multiple sclerosis patients and their treating physicians assess and deal with PML risk? Is PML risk the real reason for natalizumab discontinuation? Methods: 699 natalizumab-treated multiple sclerosis patients and 99 physicians were included in this prospective observational study. Questionnaires were completed at 5 different time points. Patients were stratified into 5 subgroups according to the presence of PML risk factors (prior immunosuppression, anti-JCV antibody status, treatment duration). Patients with prior immunosuppression (n = 30, treated by n = 7 physicians) were excluded from analyses, because patient numbers were too small. Patients’ anti-JCV antibody index was not considered because data recruitment ended in 2014. Using Bayesian network and regression analysis, we examined the relationship between different patient- and physician-related factors and patients’ discontinuation of natalizumab. Results: Patients of all subgroups and physicians assessed the PML risk as low. Overall patient adherence to natalizumab was high (87%). Only 13% of patients discontinued therapy. Natalizumab treatment cessation was associated with different patient- and physician-related factors (physicians’ assessment of general PML risk, number of treated patients per year, natalizumab treatment duration, relapses during the course of study) upon which only physicians’ judgment on treatment continuation, patients’ perception of personal PML risk, and JCV seroconversion showed significant relationships. Conclusion: According to the currently employed risk stratification algorithm, the objective PML risk probably doesn’t play a dominant role in a patients’ decision to continue or stop natalizumab treatment. The decision-making process is rather guided by subjective views and experiences of patients and treating neurologists. Treating physicians should consider this discrepancy in their advice to improve the risk-benefit-ratio for the individual patient.
Suggested Citation
Julia Krämer & Jan-Gerd Tenberge & Ingo Kleiter & Wolfgang Gaissmaier & Tobias Ruck & Christoph Heesen & Sven G Meuth, 2017.
"Is the risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy the real reason for natalizumab discontinuation in patients with multiple sclerosis?,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(4), pages 1-17, April.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0174858
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174858
Download full text from publisher
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Ingrid E. H. Kremer & Mickael Hiligsmann & Josh Carlson & Marita Zimmermann & Peter J. Jongen & Silvia M. A. A. Evers & Svenja Petersohn & Xavier G. L. V. Pouwels & Nick Bansback, 2020.
"Exploring the Cost Effectiveness of Shared Decision Making for Choosing between Disease-Modifying Drugs for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis in the Netherlands: A State Transition Model,"
Medical Decision Making, , vol. 40(8), pages 1003-1019, November.
- Jorge Maurino & Javier Sotoca & Ángel P. Sempere & Luis Brieva & Carlos López de Silanes & Ana B. Caminero & María Terzaghi & Julia Gracia-Gil & Gustavo Saposnik, 2021.
"High-Efficacy Disease-Modifying Therapies in People with Relapsing–Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: The Role of Risk Attitude in Treatment Decisions,"
The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 14(2), pages 241-248, March.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0174858. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.