IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0165230.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Mathematical Model of the Olfactory Bulb for the Selective Adaptation Mechanism in the Rodent Olfactory System

Author

Listed:
  • Zu Soh
  • Shinya Nishikawa
  • Yuichi Kurita
  • Noboru Takiguchi
  • Toshio Tsuji

Abstract

To predict the odor quality of an odorant mixture, the interaction between odorants must be taken into account. Previously, an experiment in which mice discriminated between odorant mixtures identified a selective adaptation mechanism in the olfactory system. This paper proposes an olfactory model for odorant mixtures that can account for selective adaptation in terms of neural activity. The proposed model uses the spatial activity pattern of the mitral layer obtained from model simulations to predict the perceptual similarity between odors. Measured glomerular activity patterns are used as input to the model. The neural interaction between mitral cells and granular cells is then simulated, and a dissimilarity index between odors is defined using the activity patterns of the mitral layer. An odor set composed of three odorants is used to test the ability of the model. Simulations are performed based on the odor discrimination experiment on mice. As a result, we observe that part of the neural activity in the glomerular layer is enhanced in the mitral layer, whereas another part is suppressed. We find that the dissimilarity index strongly correlates with the odor discrimination rate of mice: r = 0.88 (p = 0.019). We conclude that our model has the ability to predict the perceptual similarity of odorant mixtures. In addition, the model also accounts for selective adaptation via the odor discrimination rate, and the enhancement and inhibition in the mitral layer may be related to this selective adaptation.

Suggested Citation

  • Zu Soh & Shinya Nishikawa & Yuichi Kurita & Noboru Takiguchi & Toshio Tsuji, 2016. "A Mathematical Model of the Olfactory Bulb for the Selective Adaptation Mechanism in the Rodent Olfactory System," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(12), pages 1-16, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0165230
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165230
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0165230
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0165230&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0165230?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kobi Snitz & Adi Yablonka & Tali Weiss & Idan Frumin & Rehan M Khan & Noam Sobel, 2013. "Predicting Odor Perceptual Similarity from Odor Structure," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(9), pages 1-12, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ritesh Kumar & Rishemjit Kaur & Benjamin Auffarth & Amol P Bhondekar, 2015. "Understanding the Odour Spaces: A Step towards Solving Olfactory Stimulus-Percept Problem," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(10), pages 1-19, October.
    2. Carmen C Licon & Guillaume Bosc & Mohammed Sabri & Marylou Mantel & Arnaud Fournel & Caroline Bushdid & Jerome Golebiowski & Celine Robardet & Marc Plantevit & Mehdi Kaytoue & Moustafa Bensafi, 2019. "Chemical features mining provides new descriptive structure-odor relationships," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, April.
    3. Jisub Bae & Ju-Yeon Yi & Cheil Moon, 2019. "Odor quality profile is partially influenced by verbal cues," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(12), pages 1-17, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0165230. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.