IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pcbi00/1006945.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Chemical features mining provides new descriptive structure-odor relationships

Author

Listed:
  • Carmen C Licon
  • Guillaume Bosc
  • Mohammed Sabri
  • Marylou Mantel
  • Arnaud Fournel
  • Caroline Bushdid
  • Jerome Golebiowski
  • Celine Robardet
  • Marc Plantevit
  • Mehdi Kaytoue
  • Moustafa Bensafi

Abstract

An important goal in researching the biology of olfaction is to link the perception of smells to the chemistry of odorants. In other words, why do some odorants smell like fruits and others like flowers? While the so-called stimulus-percept issue was resolved in the field of color vision some time ago, the relationship between the chemistry and psycho-biology of odors remains unclear up to the present day. Although a series of investigations have demonstrated that this relationship exists, the descriptive and explicative aspects of the proposed models that are currently in use require greater sophistication. One reason for this is that the algorithms of current models do not consistently consider the possibility that multiple chemical rules can describe a single quality despite the fact that this is the case in reality, whereby two very different molecules can evoke a similar odor. Moreover, the available datasets are often large and heterogeneous, thus rendering the generation of multiple rules without any use of a computational approach overly complex. We considered these two issues in the present paper. First, we built a new database containing 1689 odorants characterized by physicochemical properties and olfactory qualities. Second, we developed a computational method based on a subgroup discovery algorithm that discriminated perceptual qualities of smells on the basis of physicochemical properties. Third, we ran a series of experiments on 74 distinct olfactory qualities and showed that the generation and validation of rules linking chemistry to odor perception was possible. Taken together, our findings provide significant new insights into the relationship between stimulus and percept in olfaction. In addition, by automatically extracting new knowledge linking chemistry of odorants and psychology of smells, our results provide a new computational framework of analysis enabling scientists in the field to test original hypotheses using descriptive or predictive modeling.Author summary: An important issue in olfaction sciences deals with the question of how a chemical information can be translated into percepts. This is known as the stimulus-percept problem. Here, we set out to better understand this issue by combining knowledge about the chemistry and cognition of smells with computational olfaction. We also assumed that not only one, but several physicochemical models may describe a given olfactory quality. To achieve this aim, a first challenge was to set up a database with ~1700 molecules characterized by chemical features and described by olfactory qualities (e.g. fruity, woody). A second challenge consisted in developing a computational model enabling the discrimination of olfactory qualities based on these chemical features. By meeting these 2 challenges, we provided for several olfactory qualities new chemical models describing why an odorant molecule smells fruity or woody (among others). For most qualities, multiple (rather than a single) chemical models were generated. These findings provide new elements of knowledge about the relationship between odorant chemistry and perception. They also make it possible to envisage concrete applications in the aroma and fragrance field where chemical characterization of smells is an important step in the design of new products.

Suggested Citation

  • Carmen C Licon & Guillaume Bosc & Mohammed Sabri & Marylou Mantel & Arnaud Fournel & Caroline Bushdid & Jerome Golebiowski & Celine Robardet & Marc Plantevit & Mehdi Kaytoue & Moustafa Bensafi, 2019. "Chemical features mining provides new descriptive structure-odor relationships," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1006945
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006945
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006945
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006945&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006945?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kobi Snitz & Adi Yablonka & Tali Weiss & Idan Frumin & Rehan M Khan & Noam Sobel, 2013. "Predicting Odor Perceptual Similarity from Odor Structure," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(9), pages 1-12, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marylène Rugard & Thomas Jaylet & Olivier Taboureau & Anne Tromelin & Karine Audouze, 2021. "Smell compounds classification using UMAP to increase knowledge of odors and molecular structures linkages," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(5), pages 1-17, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jisub Bae & Ju-Yeon Yi & Cheil Moon, 2019. "Odor quality profile is partially influenced by verbal cues," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(12), pages 1-17, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pcbi00:1006945. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ploscompbiol (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.