IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0163674.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Work-Related Factors Considered by Sickness-Absent Employees When Estimating Timeframes for Returning to Work

Author

Listed:
  • Amanda E Young
  • YoonSun Choi

Abstract

Introduction: Work-related factors have been found to be influential in shaping a number of return-to-work outcomes including return-to-work expectations. Based on the idea that work-related factors have the potential for modification through workplace-based initiatives, this study involved a detailed examination of work-related factors referenced by workers as being taken into consideration when estimating timeframes for returning to work. Methods: Focus groups were conducted with 30 employees, currently off work (≤ 3 months) due to a musculoskeletal condition. During the focus groups, participants wrote and spoke about the factors that they considered when forming their expectations for returning to work. Data were subjected to thematic content analysis. Results: Discussions revealed that participants’ considerations tended to differ depending on whether or not they had a job to return to. Those with jobs (n = 23) referenced specific influences such as working relationships, accommodations, physical and practical limitations, as well as concerns about their ability to do their job. Those without a job to return to (n = 7) talked about the ways they would go about finding work, and how long they thought this would take. Both groups mentioned the influence of wanting to find the “right” job, retraining and being limited due to the need for income. Conclusion: Findings indicate that employees reference numerous work-related factors when estimating their timeframes for returning to work, and that many of these have been previously identified as relating to other return-to-work outcomes. Findings suggest the potential to improve return-to-work expectation through addressing work-related influences, and helping people work through the tasks they need to complete in order to move forward in the return-to-work process.

Suggested Citation

  • Amanda E Young & YoonSun Choi, 2016. "Work-Related Factors Considered by Sickness-Absent Employees When Estimating Timeframes for Returning to Work," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(10), pages 1-16, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0163674
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163674
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0163674
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0163674&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0163674?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oliver, Richard L. & Winer, Russell S., 1987. "A framework for the formation and structure of consumer expectations: Review and propositions," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 8(4), pages 469-499, December.
    2. Amanda E Young & YoonSun Choi & Elyssa Besen, 2015. "An Exploration of the Factors Considered When Forming Expectations for Returning to Work following Sickness Absence Due to a Musculoskeletal Condition," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(11), pages 1-17, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chao Wang & Ilaria Dalla Pozza, 2014. "The antecedents of customer lifetime duration and discounted expected transactions: Discrete-time based transaction data analysis," Working Papers 2014-203, Department of Research, Ipag Business School.
    2. Chatzigeorgiou, Chryssoula & Christou, Evangelos & Simeli, Ioanna, 2017. "Delegate satisfaction from conference service quality and its impact on future behavioural intentions," MPRA Paper 93933, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Soomro, Yasir & Al-Sehli, Ahmed Nafe, 2020. "Determinants of Customer Churn: An Empirical Study Of Cellular Subscribers From Saudi Arabia," MPRA Paper 101398, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Arnold, Mark J. & Reynolds, Kristy E. & Ponder, Nicole & Lueg, Jason E., 2005. "Customer delight in a retail context: investigating delightful and terrible shopping experiences," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(8), pages 1132-1145, August.
    5. Jihoon Cho & Swinder Janda, 2023. "Perception carryover in cross-buying: the role of interpurchase time and product locus," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(4), pages 809-819, December.
    6. Ruth N. Bolton, 1998. "A Dynamic Model of the Duration of the Customer's Relationship with a Continuous Service Provider: The Role of Satisfaction," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(1), pages 45-65.
    7. Evanschitzky, Heiner & Malhotra, Neeru & Wangenheim, Florian v. & Lemon, Katherine N., 2017. "Antecedents of peripheral services cross-buying behavior," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 218-224.
    8. Lakin, Kimberly & Kane, Sumit, 2022. "Peoples’ expectations of healthcare: A conceptual review and proposed analytical framework," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    9. Aronson, Olivia & Hanson, Sara & LaFont, Matthew, 2025. "Innovative organizations’ CSR signaling: Consumer perceptions, expectations, and outcomes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    10. Balabanis, George & Reynolds, Nina & Simintiras, Antonis, 2006. "Bases of e-store loyalty: Perceived switching barriers and satisfaction," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(2), pages 214-224, February.
    11. Sohn, Stefanie & Groß, Michael, 2020. "Understanding the inhibitors to consumer mobile purchasing intentions," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    12. Yasutoshi Moteki, 2023. "Customer Satisfaction with Branch Office Services in Higashihiroshima, Hiroshima Prefecture," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 805-823, June.
    13. Murray, John & Elms, Jonathan & Teller, Christoph, 2017. "Examining the role of store design on consumers’ cross-sectional perceptions of retail brand loyalty," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 147-156.
    14. Jonathan D. Bohlmann & José Antonio Rosa & Ruth N. Bolton & William J. Qualls, 2006. "The Effect of Group Interactions on Satisfaction Judgments: Satisfaction Escalation," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(4), pages 301-321, July.
    15. Tunyaporn Vichiengior & Claire-Lise Ackermann & Adrian Palmer, 2019. "Consumer anticipation: antecedents, processes and outcomes," Post-Print hal-02129146, HAL.
    16. Konuş, Umut & Neslin, Scott A. & Verhoef, Peter C., 2014. "The effect of search channel elimination on purchase incidence, order size and channel choice," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 49-64.
    17. Mathies, Christine & Gudergan, Siegfried P., 2011. "The role of fairness in modelling customer choice," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 22-29.
    18. Mitra, Debanjan & Fay, Scott, 2010. "Managing Service Expectations in Online Markets: A Signaling Theory of E-tailer Pricing and Empirical Tests," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 86(2), pages 184-199.
    19. Sangkil Moon & Barry Bayus & Youjae Yi & Junhee Kim, 2015. "Local consumers’ reception of imported and domestic movies in the Korean movie market," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 39(1), pages 99-121, February.
    20. Justin Jia & Jia Li & Weixin Liu, 2023. "Expectation-based consumer purchase decisions: behavioral modeling and observations," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 397-413, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0163674. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.