IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0158693.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling the Impact of Uganda’s Safe Male Circumcision Program: Implications for Age and Regional Targeting

Author

Listed:
  • Katharine Kripke
  • Andrea Vazzano
  • William Kirungi
  • Joshua Musinguzi
  • Alex Opio
  • Rhobbinah Ssempebwa
  • Susan Nakawunde
  • Sheila Kyobutungi
  • Juliet N Akao
  • Fred Magala
  • George Mwidu
  • Delivette Castor
  • Emmanuel Njeuhmeli

Abstract

Background: Uganda aims to provide safe male circumcision (SMC) to 80% of men ages 15–49 by 2016. To date, only 2 million men have received SMC of the 4.2 million men required. In response to age and regional trends in SMC uptake, the country sought to re-examine its targets with respect to age and subnational region, to assess the program’s progress, and to refine the implementation approach. Methods and Findings: The Decision Makers’ Program Planning Tool, Version 2.0 (DMPPT 2.0), was used in conjunction with incidence projections from the Spectrum/AIDS Impact Module (AIM) to conduct this analysis. Population, births, deaths, and HIV incidence and prevalence were used to populate the model. Baseline male circumcision prevalence was derived from the 2011 AIDS Indicator Survey. Uganda can achieve the most immediate impact on HIV incidence by circumcising men ages 20–34. This group will also require the fewest circumcisions for each HIV infection averted. Focusing on men ages 10–19 will offer the greatest impact over a 15-year period, while focusing on men ages 15–34 offers the most cost-effective strategy over the same period. A regional analysis showed little variation in cost-effectiveness of scaling up SMC across eight regions. Scale-up is cost-saving in all regions. There is geographic variability in program progress, highlighting two regions with low baseline rates of circumcision where additional efforts will be needed. Conclusion: Focusing SMC efforts on specific age groups and regions may help to accelerate Uganda’s SMC program progress. Policy makers in Uganda have already used model outputs in planning efforts, proposing males ages 10–34 as a priority group for SMC in the 2014 application to the Global Fund’s new funding model. As scale-up continues, the country should also consider a greater effort to expand SMC in regions with low MC prevalence.

Suggested Citation

  • Katharine Kripke & Andrea Vazzano & William Kirungi & Joshua Musinguzi & Alex Opio & Rhobbinah Ssempebwa & Susan Nakawunde & Sheila Kyobutungi & Juliet N Akao & Fred Magala & George Mwidu & Delivette , 2016. "Modeling the Impact of Uganda’s Safe Male Circumcision Program: Implications for Age and Regional Targeting," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(7), pages 1-14, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0158693
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158693
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0158693
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0158693&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0158693?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Catherine Hankins & Mitchell Warren & Emmanuel Njeuhmeli, 2016. "Voluntary Medical Male Circumcision for HIV Prevention: New Mathematical Models for Strategic Demand Creation Prioritizing Subpopulations by Age and Geography," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(10), pages 1-9, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Katharine Kripke & Marjorie Opuni & Melissa Schnure & Sema Sgaier & Delivette Castor & Jason Reed & Emmanuel Njeuhmeli & John Stover, 2016. "Age Targeting of Voluntary Medical Male Circumcision Programs Using the Decision Makers’ Program Planning Toolkit (DMPPT) 2.0," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(7), pages 1-17, July.
    2. Juan Dent & Nuno Gaspar & Emmanuel Njeuhmeli & Katharine Kripke, 2019. "Age targeting and scale-up of voluntary medical male circumcision in Mozambique," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(2), pages 1-14, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Emmanuel Njeuhmeli & Melissa Schnure & Andrea Vazzano & Elizabeth Gold & Peter Stegman & Katharine Kripke & Michel Tchuenche & Lori Bollinger & Steven Forsythe & Catherine Hankins, 2019. "Using mathematical modeling to inform health policy: A case study from voluntary medical male circumcision scale-up in eastern and southern Africa and proposed framework for success," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(3), pages 1-15, March.
    2. Wilson, Nicholas, 2021. "Why is ageing associated with lower adoption of new technologies? Evidence from voluntary medical male circumcision and a structural model," The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, Elsevier, vol. 19(C).
    3. Celenkosini Thembelenkosini Nxumalo & Gugu Gladness Mchunu, 2019. "The Role of Female Partners in the uptake of Voluntary Medical Male Circumcision in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Review," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(7), pages 1-9, July.
    4. Katharine Kripke & Karin Hatzold & Owen Mugurungi & Gertrude Ncube & Sinokuthemba Xaba & Elizabeth Gold & Kim Seifert Ahanda & Natalie Kruse-Levy & Emmanuel Njeuhmeli, 2016. "Modeling Impact and Cost-Effectiveness of Increased Efforts to Attract Voluntary Medical Male Circumcision Clients Ages 20–29 in Zimbabwe," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(10), pages 1-16, October.
    5. Maria Ganczak & Marcin Korzeń & Maciej Olszewski, 2017. "Attitudes, Beliefs and Predictors of Male Circumcision Promotion among Medical University Students in a Traditionally Non-Circumcising Region," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-14, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0158693. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.