IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0156448.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Anaesthesia Management for Awake Craniotomy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Ana Stevanovic
  • Rolf Rossaint
  • Michael Veldeman
  • Federico Bilotta
  • Mark Coburn

Abstract

Background: Awake craniotomy (AC) renders an expanded role in functional neurosurgery. Yet, evidence for optimal anaesthesia management remains limited. We aimed to summarise the latest clinical evidence of AC anaesthesia management and explore the relationship of AC failures on the used anaesthesia techniques. Methods: Two authors performed independently a systematic search of English articles in PubMed and EMBASE database 1/2007-12/2015. Search included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), observational trials, and case reports (n>4 cases), which reported anaesthetic approach for AC and at least one of our pre-specified outcomes: intraoperative seizures, hypoxia, arterial hypertension, nausea and vomiting, neurological dysfunction, conversion into general anaesthesia and failure of AC. Random effects meta-analysis was used to estimate event rates for four outcomes. Relationship with anaesthesia technique was explored using logistic meta-regression, calculating the odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals [95%CI]. Results: We have included forty-seven studies. Eighteen reported asleep-awake-asleep technique (SAS), twenty-seven monitored anaesthesia care (MAC), one reported both and one used the awake-awake-awake technique (AAA). Proportions of AC failures, intraoperative seizures, new neurological dysfunction and conversion into general anaesthesia (GA) were 2% [95%CI:1–3], 8% [95%CI:6–11], 17% [95%CI:12–23] and 2% [95%CI:2–3], respectively. Meta-regression of SAS and MAC technique did not reveal any relevant differences between outcomes explained by the technique, except for conversion into GA. Estimated OR comparing SAS to MAC for AC failures was 0.98 [95%CI:0.36–2.69], 1.01 [95%CI:0.52–1.88] for seizures, 1.66 [95%CI:1.35–3.70] for new neurological dysfunction and 2.17 [95%CI:1.22–3.85] for conversion into GA. The latter result has to be interpreted cautiously. It is based on one retrospective high-risk of bias study and significance was abolished in a sensitivity analysis of only prospectively conducted studies. Conclusion: SAS and MAC techniques were feasible and safe, whereas data for AAA technique are limited. Large RCTs are required to prove superiority of one anaesthetic regime for AC.

Suggested Citation

  • Ana Stevanovic & Rolf Rossaint & Michael Veldeman & Federico Bilotta & Mark Coburn, 2016. "Anaesthesia Management for Awake Craniotomy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(5), pages 1-44, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0156448
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156448
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0156448
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0156448&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0156448?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Viechtbauer, Wolfgang, 2010. "Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 36(i03).
    2. Alessandro Liberati & Douglas G Altman & Jennifer Tetzlaff & Cynthia Mulrow & Peter C Gøtzsche & John P A Ioannidis & Mike Clarke & P J Devereaux & Jos Kleijnen & David Moher, 2009. "The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(7), pages 1-28, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tanja Mingebach & Inge Kamp-Becker & Hanna Christiansen & Linda Weber, 2018. "Meta-meta-analysis on the effectiveness of parent-based interventions for the treatment of child externalizing behavior problems," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(9), pages 1-21, September.
    2. Ma, Guiling & Chen, Yanting & Ndegwa, Pius, 2022. "Anaerobic digestion process deactivates major pathogens in biowaste: A meta-analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    3. Ma, Guiling & Chen, Yanting & Ndegwa, Pius, 2021. "Association between methane yield and microbiota abundance in the anaerobic digestion process: A meta-regression," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    4. Marta Ferrero & Gillian West & Miguel A Vadillo, 2017. "Is crossed laterality associated with academic achievement and intelligence? A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, August.
    5. Aurelie Chanson-Rolle & François Aubin & Veronique Braesco & Toshimitsu Hamasaki & Masafumi Kitakaze, 2015. "Influence of the Lactotripeptides Isoleucine–Proline–Proline and Valine–Proline–Proline on Systolic Blood Pressure in Japanese Subjects: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled ," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(11), pages 1-16, November.
    6. Katja Engel & Torge Huckhagel & Alessandro Gulberti & Monika Pötter-Nerger & Eik Vettorazzi & Ute Hidding & Chi-un Choe & Simone Zittel & Hanna Braaß & Peter Ludewig & Miriam Schaper & Kara Krajewski , 2018. "Towards unambiguous reporting of complications related to deep brain stimulation surgery: A retrospective single-center analysis and systematic review of the literature," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-29, August.
    7. Sandra Invernizzi & Alice Bodart & Laurent Lefebvre & Isabelle Simoes Loureiro, 2023. "The role of semantic assessment in the differential diagnosis between late-life depression and Alzheimer’s disease or amnestic mild cognitive impairment: systematic review and meta-analysis," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 1-20, December.
    8. Maria-Francisca Cespedes-Lopez & Raul-Tomas Mora-Garcia & V. Raul Perez-Sanchez & Juan-Carlos Perez-Sanchez, 2019. "Meta-Analysis of Price Premiums in Housing with Energy Performance Certificates (EPC)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-59, November.
    9. Mirre J P Simons & Alan A Cohen & Simon Verhulst, 2012. "What Does Carotenoid-Dependent Coloration Tell? Plasma Carotenoid Level Signals Immunocompetence and Oxidative Stress State in Birds–A Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(8), pages 1-1, August.
    10. Jeremiah W Acharibasam & Batholomew Chireh & Hayelom G Menegesha, 2021. "Assessing anxiety, depression and insomnia symptoms among Ebola survivors in Africa: A meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(2), pages 1-14, February.
    11. Ulviye Isik & Omaima El Tahir & Martijn Meeter & Martijn W. Heymans & Elise P. Jansma & Gerda Croiset & Rashmi A. Kusurkar, 2018. "Factors Influencing Academic Motivation of Ethnic Minority Students: A Review," SAGE Open, , vol. 8(2), pages 21582440187, June.
    12. Whitney S Beck & Ed K Hall, 2018. "Confounding factors in algal phosphorus limitation experiments," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-19, October.
    13. Tripathy, Prajukta & Jena, Pabitra Kumar & Mishra, Bikash Ranjan, 2024. "Systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis of energy efficiency," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    14. Elizabeth T Cafiero-Fonseca & Andrew Stawasz & Sydney T Johnson & Reiko Sato & David E Bloom, 2017. "The full benefits of adult pneumococcal vaccination: A systematic review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(10), pages 1-23, October.
    15. Ludoviko Zirimenya & Fatima Mahmud-Ajeigbe & Ruth McQuillan & You Li, 2020. "A systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the association between urogenital schistosomiasis and HIV/AIDS infection," PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(6), pages 1-13, June.
    16. Xindong Xue & W. Robert Reed & Robbie C.M. van Aert, 2022. "Social Capital and Economic Growth: A Meta-Analysis," Working Papers in Economics 22/20, University of Canterbury, Department of Economics and Finance.
    17. Trang Nguyen & Sara Holton & Thach Tran & Jane Fisher, 2019. "Informal mental health interventions for people with severe mental illness in low and lower middle-income countries: A systematic review of effectiveness," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 65(3), pages 194-206, May.
    18. Natalya Ivanova & Ekaterina Zolotova, 2023. "Landolt Indicator Values in Modern Research: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-22, June.
    19. Su Keng Tan & Wai Keung Leung & Alexander Tin Hong Tang & Roger A Zwahlen, 2017. "Effects of mandibular setback with or without maxillary advancement osteotomies on pharyngeal airways: An overview of systematic reviews," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(10), pages 1-20, October.
    20. Vecchio, Riccardo & Caso, Gerarda & Cembalo, Luigi & Borrello, Massimiliano, 2020. "Is respondents’ inattention in online surveys a major issue for research?," Economia agro-alimentare / Food Economy, Italian Society of Agri-food Economics/Società Italiana di Economia Agro-Alimentare (SIEA), vol. 22(1), March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0156448. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.